On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 08:31:43AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Jon, Grant,
>
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:49:40 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:05:28PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The driver was previously using i2c_add_numbered_adapter(), giving MPC
> > > >
Hi Jon, Grant,
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:49:40 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:05:28PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > On 6/25/08, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > i2c->adap = mpc_ops;
> > > > - i2c->adap.nr = pdev->id;
> > > > i2c_set_ad
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:40:57PM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:42 PM, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:24:46PM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> >> compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-immr";
> >> +
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:24:46PM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Updated device tree for MPC5121ADS
Really should be more detailed in the commit message.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Rigby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc5121ads.dts | 309 -
> 1 fil
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:07:57AM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> This allows other platforms with the same pci
> block like MPC5121 to use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Rigby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig |2 +-
>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:07:56AM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Choosing PCI or not at config time is allowed on some
> platforms via an if expression in arch/powerpc/Kconfig.
> To add a new platform with PCI support selectable at
> config time, you must change the if expression. This
> patch makes
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 03:07:48PM -0600, John Linn wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> It appears that you designed the simpleImage around Xilinx FPGAs.
Yes.
> Since we have to initialize the 16550 UART in the bootstrap and there's
> no boot loader, were you thinking we would add the 16550 initialization
>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:35:56PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:30:35 -0600 John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll try to better understand if we can detect the compressed device
> > tree and if we really have to disable the APU.
> >
> > What's the reasoning for being i
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:58:39AM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> The class of the MPC5121 pci host bridge is PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_OTHER
> while other freescale host bridges have class set to
> PCI_CLASS_PROCESSOR_POWERPC.
>
> This patch makes fixup_hide_host_resource_fsl match
> PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_OTHER in
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:58:38AM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Copied from 83xx minus support for two busses.
If this is a copy, then can it be shared?
g.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc
Minor comments below.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:58:37AM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Add a interrupt host for the interrupt
> controller in the mpc5121ads cpld.
> PCI interrupts are 0-7 the rest are 8-15
> Touchscreen pendown irq is hardwired to irq1
> All other irqs are chainged to irq0
>
> Signe
Mostly looks good, but a few comments below.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:58:36AM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Move shared code from mpc5121_ads.c to mpc512x_shared.c.
> Add new generic board setup mpc5121_generic.c
>
> Signed-off-by: John Rigby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/512
Mostly looks good, a few comments below.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:58:35AM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Implements the api defined in include/clk.h
>
> Current only getting frequencies is supported
> not setting.
Need a more detailed commit message. This doesn't tell me much.
>
> Signed-off-by
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Convert i2c-mpc from a platform driver into an of_platform driver.
> This patch is much smaller since Jochen already added
> of_find_i2c_driver(). Versions of this have been posted before.
>
> Signed-ff-by: Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PR
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:05:28PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On 6/25/08, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > i2c->adap = mpc_ops;
> > > - i2c->adap.nr = pdev->id;
> > > i2c_set_adapdata(&i2c->adap, i2c);
> > > - i2c->adap.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> > > -
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:43:39PM -0400, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:25:05 -0400
> "Jon Smirl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 6/28/08, Sean MacLennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is a patch to the ibm iic driver that uses the non-numbered
> > > i2c call and there
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:25:05 -0400
"Jon Smirl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/28/08, Sean MacLennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is a patch to the ibm iic driver that uses the non-numbered
> > i2c call and therefore does not need an index. Instead, it
> > registers the ibm iic, then wal
On 6/28/08, Sean MacLennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a patch to the ibm iic driver that uses the non-numbered
> i2c call and therefore does not need an index. Instead, it registers the
> ibm iic, then walks all the child nodes and adds them. This is required
> for new style drivers, o
This is a patch to the ibm iic driver that uses the non-numbered
i2c call and therefore does not need an index. Instead, it registers the
ibm iic, then walks all the child nodes and adds them. This is required
for new style drivers, old style drivers "just work".
The warp has both a new style driv
On 6/25/08, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > i2c->adap = mpc_ops;
> > - i2c->adap.nr = pdev->id;
> > i2c_set_adapdata(&i2c->adap, i2c);
> > - i2c->adap.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> > - if ((result = i2c_add_numbered_adapter(&i2c->adap)) < 0) {
> > + i
I'm really don't like "fsl,sec1.0" or any of the variants as a
compatible property either because it can easily be abused (it's not
anchored to a specific physical part so the meaning can shift over
time); but that is another argument and it is well documented in other
email threads
(http://thre
+static inline unsigned int
+csum_tcpudp_nofold(unsigned long saddr, unsigned long daddr, unsigned
short len,
+ unsigned short proto, unsigned int sum)
+{
+ __asm__("add %0, %4, %1\n\t"
+ "addc %0, %4, %2\n\t"
+ "addc %0, %4, %3\n\t"
+
Hi John.
Oops, you had also posted this patch to the list later, so I'm also
forwarding my comments to the list.
Cheers,
g.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply on this one, I had gotten rather busy.
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:09
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Stephen Neuendorffer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> legacy_serial identifies a valid ns16550 on a simple-bus, but the
> legacy_serial driver doesn't understand the shift and offset flags
> necessary to get it to work, which results in no console.
>
> I think the eas
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Wolfram Sang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If an I2C device node does not specify an interrupt, the .irq member of the
> board_info struct was set to -1. This caused crashes on following
> irq_dispose_mappings. Leave it NO_IRQ as returned from irq_of_parse_and_map.
If an I2C device node does not specify an interrupt, the .irq member of the
board_info struct was set to -1. This caused crashes on following
irq_dispose_mappings. Leave it NO_IRQ as returned from irq_of_parse_and_map.
(Suggesting -1 as 'i2c-no-irq' used to be a bug in linux/i2c.h.)
Signed-off-by:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 28, 2008, at 1:51 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>
>> When compiling kernel modules for ppc that include , gcc
>> prints a warning message every time it encounters a function declaration
>> where
>> the inline keyword app
On Jun 28, 2008, at 1:51 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
When compiling kernel modules for ppc that include spinlock.h>, gcc
prints a warning message every time it encounters a function
declaration where
the inline keyword appears after the return type. The patch below
makes sure
that the order o
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:31:54 -0700 "Grant Likely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c |2 +-
> >
When compiling kernel modules for ppc that include , gcc
prints a warning message every time it encounters a function declaration where
the inline keyword appears after the return type. The patch below makes sure
that the order of the inline keyword and the return type is as gcc expects it.
Additio
30 matches
Mail list logo
