On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:40:57PM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:42 PM, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:24:46PM -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> >>       [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> >>               compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-immr";
> >> +             device_type = "soc";
> >
> > I realise we still need the unwanted device_type value on the soc in
> > some cases for backwards compatibility, but why are you adding it
> > where it wasn't before..?
> >
> Because get_immrbase in fsl_soc.c does not work without it.

I think I'd rather see get_immrbase() instead then.

g.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to