On Oct 4, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
>> From: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] QEIC: Implement pluggable handlers, fix
>> MPIC cascading
>>
>> set_irq_chained_handler overwrites MPIC's handle_irq function
>> (handle_fasteoi_irq) thus MPIC
On Sep 25, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> 8 bytes padding required to match MPC85xx registers layout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/qe_lib/qe_io.c |3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch
Early in the 2.6.23 cycle we broke the ability to offline cpu0
(7ccb4a662462616f6be5053e26b79580e02f1529). This patch fixes that by
ensuring that the (xics) default irq server, will not be 0 when taking
cpu0 offline.
Also catches a use of irq, when virq should be used (I think that the
last one)
On Oct 4, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Kumar, can you pull this patch into your 2.6.24 tree? It's needed
> for the 8610.
applied.
- k
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 07:59:30PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:25:54PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > The zImage is already hardware and
> > firmware specific;
>
> And [potentially] firmware version and zImage size specific.
I meant to add, "which is why it'll be dif
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:25:54PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 06:58:49PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 03:50:05PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:23:09PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > > > David Gibson wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 06:58:49PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 03:50:05PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:23:09PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > > David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:36:27PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 03:50:05PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:23:09PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:36:27PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > Looking deeper at this I've found that currently u-boot thinks tha
On 10/2/07, Tony Breeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > I realise it'll make the patch bigger, but this doesn't seem like a
> > particularly good name for the variable anymore.
>
> Sure, what about?
>
> Clarify when RTAS logging i
On Oct 4, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Kumar, this is what I get when I compile your 2.6.24 branch for the
> 8610:
>
> CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.o
> In file included from arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c:40:
> include/asm/cpm2.h:14:21: error: asm/cpm.h: No such file or directo
Kumar, this is what I get when I compile your 2.6.24 branch for the 8610:
CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.o
In file included from arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c:40:
include/asm/cpm2.h:14:21: error: asm/cpm.h: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.o] Error 1
make
> From: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] QEIC: Implement pluggable handlers, fix MPIC
> cascading
>
> set_irq_chained_handler overwrites MPIC's handle_irq function
> (handle_fasteoi_irq) thus MPIC never gets eoi event from the
> cascaded IRQ. This situation hangs
Kumar, can you pull this patch into your 2.6.24 tree? It's needed for the 8610.
Timur Tabi wrote:
> Update the definition of the global utilities structure (ccsr_guts) in
> immap_86xx.h and add some related macros for the Freescale 8610 SOC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --
Alan Bennett wrote:
> Do you know what would cause this?
>
> I've configured a board to console off of SMC1 (ttyCPM0) and on 1
> board it works fine, however a new revision of the board I get the
> following result and lose the console. Both boards have "exact"
> versions of the kernel and u-boot
Do you know what would cause this?
I've configured a board to console off of SMC1 (ttyCPM0) and on 1
board it works fine, however a new revision of the board I get the
following result and lose the console. Both boards have "exact"
versions of the kernel and u-boot.
BAD: console handover: boo
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 07:27:30PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> The thing to remember is that sym2 is in transition from being a dual
> BSD/Linux driver to being a purely Linux driver.
I was wondering about that; couldn't tell if the split in the code
was historical, or being intentionally m
Hi Bernard,
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 08:49:12PM +, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:41:28 +0200, Willaert, Bernard wrote:
>
> > Problem:
> > When we log debug output via the serial console on a multithreaded
> > application, the console throughput may get clogged and then we
>
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:34:45 +1000
Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:56 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
> > >
> >
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:56 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >
> > Ben/Paulus,
> >
> > As fa
asm-powerpc/mpc85xx.h was really a hold over from arch/ppc. Now that
more decoupling has occurred we can remove and some of
its legacy.
As part of this we moved the definition of CPM_MAP_ADDR into cpm2_common
for 85xx platforms. This is a stop gap until we switch them over to the
new device-tre
On Oct 4, 2007, at 7:48 AM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:
>>
>> On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:09:33 -0500 Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc8610_hpcd.c
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 08:02:42AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> >
> > Exactly, this is what that patch is trying to do. QEIC cascade handler is
> > calling mpic's eoi() (end() actually, as it's flow level, but end == eoi.
> > Is it main objection? Ok, I can get rid of it, and use chip
So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:
>
> On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:41 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:09:33 -0500 Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/mpc8610_hpcd.c
> >> +#include
> >> +#include
> >> +#include
>
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:08:04 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:56 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
>
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:56 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >
> > Ben/Paulus,
> >
> > As f
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> Ben/Paulus,
>
> As far as I can tell this is correct. Having sysdev/dcr.c in the arch/ppc
> bui
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 17:00 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:40:44 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > +++ linux-work/drivers/edac/cell-edac.c 2007-10-04 15:34:46.0
> > +1000
> > @@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
> > +#include
> > +#include
> >
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:40:44 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> +++ linux-work/drivers/edac/cell-edac.c 2007-10-04 15:34:46.0
> +1000
> @@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
Since you us
28 matches
Mail list logo
