Hi!
The Nikon D80 got a new Firmware version 1.10 and still needs the fixup
in unusual_devs.h (I suspect they will never fix this :-))
Kind Regards, Konsti
--
GPG KeyID EF62FCEF
Fingerprint: 13C9 B16B 9844 EC15 CC2E A080 1E69 3FDA EF62 FCEF
--- linux-2.6.23/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h_o
add CC (Andrew, Greg and linux-usb)
On 2/15/08, Andrew Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my workplace, I use a customized version of Novell's ZENworks imaging
> boot CD, which is based off of Linux. I have one particular model of
> laptop - the IBM/Lenovo R61 - on which three different thing
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The kernel.h macro DIV_ROUND_UP performs the computation (((n) + (d) - 1) /
(d)) but is perhaps more readable.
An extract of the semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@haskernel@
@@
#include
@depe
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> On 2/15/08, Andrew Buehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In my workplace, I use a customized version of Novell's ZENworks imaging
> > boot CD, which is based off of Linux. I have one particular model of
> > laptop - the IBM/Lenovo R61 - on which three d
The patch below was not yet tested. If it's incorrect, please comment.
---
Fix Unlikely(x) == y
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c
b/drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c
index c40ba3a..66313b1 100644
--- a/drivers/media/
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> (Note: I consider it blatantly incorrect to send a reply both to a
> mailing list and directly to the address of someone who is subscribed to
> that list unless you have reason to believe that that someone will not
> see the message otherwise, but in th
On Feb 4, 2008 8:21 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 07:44:45PM +0530, Lal wrote:
> > I have developed a sample USB mass storage driver.
>
> I'm curious why the two existing drivers for this in the kernel did not
> properly work out for you. Are we not supporting so
(Note: I consider it blatantly incorrect to send a reply both to a
mailing list and directly to the address of someone who is subscribed to
that list unless you have reason to believe that that someone will not
see the message otherwise, but in this case I am doing so anyway because
I see no way t
It's okay, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Luca Risolia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
On Saturday 16 February 2008 17:12:26 Roel Kluin wrote:
> The patch below was not yet tested. If it's incorrect, please comment.
> ---
> Fix Unlikely(x) == y
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> diff --git a
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 06:19:46PM +0100, René Rebe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> due to some failing dics I got myself a JMicro USB<->ATA,SATA
> cable for data recovery and co.
>
> However, I was quite suprised that the SMART (...) status querries
> would not go thru.
>
> # smartctl -a /dev/sdb
> smartc
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Jean-Christophe Dubois wrote:
> Just for my information, is this patch accepted or are you expecting some
> other changes?
Patches mangled via "quoted-printable" encoding are rarely accepted. :(
Try this one instead.
- Dave
= CUT HERE
From: Jean-Christoph
From: Savin Zlobec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On USB cable disconnect g_serial doesn't hangup the port tty,
which results in an endless read on the tty device. With the
following patch the read and select behave correctly when
the cable is unplugged.
Signed-off-by: Savin Zlobec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signe
On Saturday 16 February 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> On USB cable disconnect g_serial doesn't hangup the port tty,
> which results in an endless read on the tty device. With the
> following patch the read and select behave correctly when
> the cable is unplugged.
Whoops, maybe not. Doesn't tty_h
From: Karsten Wiese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PATCH] USB: EHCI: Refactor "if (handshake()) state = HC_STATE_HALT"
Refactor the EHCI "if (handshake()) state = HC_STATE_HALT" idiom,
which appears 4 times, by replacing it with calls to a new function
called handshake_on_error_set_halt(). Saves a
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:22:25 -0800
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 16 February 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> > On USB cable disconnect g_serial doesn't hangup the port tty,
> > which results in an endless read on the tty device. With the
> > following patch the read and sel
On Saturday 16 February 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:22:25 -0800
> David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 16 February 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> > > On USB cable disconnect g_serial doesn't hangup the port tty,
> > > which results in an endless read on the
Am Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 schrieb Karsten Wiese:
>
> ITDs can be detached from urbs, before the active frame elapses. Now those
> ITDs are immediately recycled.
> If the ITD is reused then, transactions based on its new usage can already
> happen while the frame is still active, too early.
Hi
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> > For another, getting two copies of a message is no big deal --
>
> I disagree.
Everyone has his own taste. Obviously there's no world-wide consensus,
possibly because different people have different workflow habits and so
are affected by duplicate
On Saturday 16 February 2008, Karsten Wiese wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2008 schrieb Karsten Wiese:
> >
> > ITDs can be detached from urbs, before the active frame elapses. Now those
> > ITDs are immediately recycled.
> > If the ITD is reused then, transactions based on its new usage can alr
On 2/16/2008 6:11 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
For another, getting two copies of a message is no big deal --
I disagree.
Everyone has his own taste. Obviously there's no world-wide
consensus, possibly because different people have different workflow
ha
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> Messages sent to my address directly are explicitly not filtered into
> the folders I have set up for various mailing lists, so that if someone
> does send me a "heads up" reply for a specific topic on a list to which
> I am subscribed it does not get c
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 08:12:40PM -0500, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> [...] and I would not be in the least surprised if this turned out to
> be yet one more problem with gmail
It is; Gmail will refuse to POP more than one copy of a mail to you,
no matter how many copies it recieves via different path
Andrew wrote:
> (Note: I consider it blatantly incorrect to send a reply both to a
> mailing list and directly to the address of someone who is subscribed to
> that list
Regardless of how you consider it, that is how responding to these big
lists -must- work.
There is no practical way for respond
23 matches
Mail list logo
