Re: [eBeam PATCH 2/2] input: misc: New USB eBeam input driver.

2012-09-05 Thread Oliver Neukum
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 21:58:06 Yann Cantin wrote: > As ebeams are the only devices to my knowledge that work that way, i don't > think > a common API can be common, unless we mean an in-kernel generic purpose > calibration > API for input devices (stellar away for me), or a userland one

Re: [eBeam PATCH 2/2] input: misc: New USB eBeam input driver.

2012-09-05 Thread Yann Cantin
Hi, Le 05/09/2012 09:29, Oliver Neukum a écrit : > before we add yet another sysfs interface, we should ask whether calibration > isn't a problem that should be solved with a common API. Short answer : no. ## Long answer (may be oot) : Existing calibration tools or procedures (in kernel modules

Re: [eBeam PATCH 2/2] input: misc: New USB eBeam input driver.

2012-09-05 Thread Oliver Neukum
On Sunday 02 September 2012 00:52:03 Yann Cantin wrote: Hi, before we add yet another sysfs interface, we should ask whether calibration isn't a problem that should be solved with a common API. Regards Oliver > +static ssize_t ebeam_calibrated_set(struct device *dev, > +