On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 07:27:20PM +0200, Tobias Winter wrote:
> On 04.06.2013 04:49, Greg KH wrote:
> > Tobias, can you test this patch out? Note, I only compiled it, did not
> > get the chance to actually run it, so it might not work at all.
>
> Sure, I'll gladly give it a try. Seeing the comme
On 04.06.2013 04:49, Greg KH wrote:
> Tobias, can you test this patch out? Note, I only compiled it, did not
> get the chance to actually run it, so it might not work at all.
Sure, I'll gladly give it a try. Seeing the comments on the code, I'm
just wondering if there might be a more recent versi
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:04:01PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:49:59PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > > But, IMHO, a nicer approach would be to make the allocation completely
> > > dynamic, using e.g. the idr sub
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Bj?rn Mork wrote:
> > > But, IMHO, a nicer approach would be to make the allocation completely
> > > dynamic, using e.g. the idr subsystem. Static tables
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:49:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > > But, IMHO, a nicer approach would be to make the allocation completely
> > > dynamic, using e.g.
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Bj�rn Mork wrote:
> > But, IMHO, a nicer approach would be to make the allocation completely
> > dynamic, using e.g. the idr subsystem. Static tables are always feel
> > like straight jackets to me, no matter how big th
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:49:59PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > But, IMHO, a nicer approach would be to make the allocation completely
> > dynamic, using e.g. the idr subsystem. Static tables are always feel
> > like straight jackets to me,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:49:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > But, IMHO, a nicer approach would be to make the allocation completely
> > dynamic, using e.g. the idr subsystem. Static tables are always feel
> > like straight
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> But, IMHO, a nicer approach would be to make the allocation completely
> dynamic, using e.g. the idr subsystem. Static tables are always feel
> like straight jackets to me, no matter how big they are :)
You are right, I didn't change th
Tobias Winter writes:
> Hi,
>
> I did a bit more fiddling with the usb-serial stack and got it to
> support more than 256 devices. I tested it with up to 281 FTDI
> singleport adapters. (After that i ran out of usb cables.. )
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakob-Tobias Winter
> ---
> include/linux/usb/seri
Hi,
I did a bit more fiddling with the usb-serial stack and got it to
support more than 256 devices. I tested it with up to 281 FTDI
singleport adapters. (After that i ran out of usb cables.. )
Signed-off-by: Jakob-Tobias Winter
---
include/linux/usb/serial.h |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 in
11 matches
Mail list logo
