On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:49:59PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:28:51PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > But, IMHO, a nicer approach would be to make the allocation completely
> > dynamic, using e.g. the idr subsystem. Static tables are always feel
> > like straight jackets to me, no matter how big they are :)
>
> You are right, I didn't change the code to use idr (it predates idr by
> about a decade or so), because I thought we needed the "rage" logic that
> the usb-serial minor reservation does.
Rage logic sounds like my kinda code.
> +static int get_free_port(struct usb_serial_port *port)
> {
> - unsigned int i, j;
> - int good_spot;
> -
> - dev_dbg(&serial->interface->dev, "%s %d\n", __func__, num_ports);
> + int i;
>
> - *minor = 0;
> mutex_lock(&table_lock);
> - for (i = 0; i < SERIAL_TTY_MINORS; ++i) {
> - if (serial_table[i])
> - continue;
> + i = idr_alloc(&serial_minors, port, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (i < 0)
> + return -EEXIST;
> + port->number = i;
> + mutex_unlock(&table_lock);
> + return i;
> +}
-EEXIST case misses the mutex unlock.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
