Lothar Waßmann writes:
> This patch provides a cleaner solution to the problem described in
> commit 20a677fd.
>
> The goal to be achieved is to force USB_CHIPIDEA=m if either
> USB_EHCI_HCD=m or USB_GADGET=m.
> If both are 'y' USB_CHIPIDEA may be selected to be 'm' or 'y'.
>
> The old patch had
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:21:13PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> This patch provides a cleaner solution to the problem described in
> commit 20a677fd.
>
> The goal to be achieved is to force USB_CHIPIDEA=m if either
> USB_EHCI_HCD=m or USB_GADGET=m.
> If both are 'y' USB_CHIPIDEA may be selected
Hello.
On 07/31/2013 06:21 PM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
This patch provides a cleaner solution to the problem described in
commit 20a677fd.
Please also specify that commit's summary line in parens.
The goal to be achieved is to force USB_CHIPIDEA=m if either
USB_EHCI_HCD=m or USB_GADGET=m.
This patch provides a cleaner solution to the problem described in
commit 20a677fd.
The goal to be achieved is to force USB_CHIPIDEA=m if either
USB_EHCI_HCD=m or USB_GADGET=m.
If both are 'y' USB_CHIPIDEA may be selected to be 'm' or 'y'.
The old patch had the drawback, that USB_CHIPIDEA could b
