On Mon, Jan 28 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:49:35PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Running latest -git (head 91525300baf162e83e923b09ca286f9205e21522) and
> > connecting my cf usb storage device yields and endless stream of:
> >
> > Initializing USB Mass Storage dri
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:54:35AM +0100, Stephen J. Gowdy wrote:
> Looks like David added the first one to CVS already, just about to add the
> rest.
Great, thanks for doing this.
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Looks like David added the first one to CVS already, just about to add
the rest.
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
Adds the Linux Foundation's Vendor id and three product ids
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- usb.ids.original2008-01-28 14:21:24.0 -0800
+
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 05:09:30PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: USB: use a real vendor and product id for root hubs
> >
> > Turns out that a company is out there using the vendor id of 0x in
> >
Adds the Linux Foundation's Vendor id and three product ids
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- usb.ids.original2008-01-28 14:21:24.0 -0800
+++ usb.ids 2008-01-28 14:24:01.0 -0800
@@ -6010,6 +6010,10 @@
1d1f Diostech Co., Ltd.
1d20 SAMTACK INC.
1
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:20:31PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:15:23 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >[...]
> > I just tried it again, and it did the same thing, resetting like you
> > describe, until it resets itself and then the device dies, Linux works
> >
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:15:23 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
> I just tried it again, and it did the same thing, resetting like you
> describe, until it resets itself and then the device dies, Linux works
> just fine.
Thanks for trying this for me. The important thing is that you
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 03:02:53PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Hi, Greg:
>
> I think the berry_charge is your baby. Please direct me to the
> right person if it's not so.
>
> I have a bug in Fedora:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379341
>
> It's pretty long, but the summary is t
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: USB: use a real vendor and product id for root hubs
>
> Turns out that a company is out there using the vendor id of 0x in
> the wild, so use a real vendor/product id for the root hubs.
>
> Now that
Hello *,
i'm not a device drivers developer, but i'm trying to learn something
about the kernel.
I'm starting the adventure with this USB Thermometer:
http://www.usbfever.com/index_eproduct_view.php?products_id=257
passing vendorid and productid to the ftdi_sio kernel module, I can
attach the dev
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:02:32 -0800:
> FYI, this is a patch that will be sent out in the next round to Linus
> for inclusion in 2.6.25.
>
> If anyone has any objections about it, please let me know.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
>
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hart
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 05:12:18PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 26. Januar 2008 16:56:39 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > "should" doesn't mean do. You want to make a change visible to user space.
> > > That needs a reason beyond coolness.
> >
> > There was a reason. ?Some device was using I
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 12:32:18PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:06:29PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:58:03 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 07:07:48AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On S
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:42:27PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > I'm getting the above error messages a lot in my current USB kernel
> > tree. I'm guessing it's due to the:
> > Subject: USB: EHCI: add separate IAA watchdog timer
> > patch from Alan (as10
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:49:35PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Running latest -git (head 91525300baf162e83e923b09ca286f9205e21522) and
> connecting my cf usb storage device yields and endless stream of:
>
> Initializing USB Mass Storage driver...
> scsi6 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Stora
> "Grant" == Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
Grant> I've now merged the driver into my tree and tested it.
Grant> The good news is that using only one device node is absolutely
Grant> no problem. It works without error or complaint and sysfs
Grant> looks sane.
Great.
Gra
On 1/23/08, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 January 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
> > The question is about the device structure which used to be provided
> > by the platform device instances and now there just uses the c67x00's
> > device struct. I was under the impression
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Monday 28 January 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Any ideas why this is so noisy and slows down USB device discovery?
> >
> > Noisy: it should be ehci_dbg() not ehci_info().
>
> ... also, it looks li
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> I'm getting the above error messages a lot in my current USB kernel
> tree. I'm guessing it's due to the:
> Subject: USB: EHCI: add separate IAA watchdog timer
> patch from Alan (as1028) which was based off an earlier patch from
> David.
>
> Any ideas
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:24:31AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Monday 28 January 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Any ideas why this is so noisy and slows down USB device discovery?
> >
> > Noisy: it should be ehci_dbg() not ehci_info().
>
> .
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:06:22AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > Any ideas why this is so noisy and slows down USB device discovery?
>
> Noisy: it should be ehci_dbg() not ehci_info().
But even then, it's taking longer to boot because of this proble
On Monday 28 January 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > Any ideas why this is so noisy and slows down USB device discovery?
>
> Noisy: it should be ehci_dbg() not ehci_info().
... also, it looks like the watchdog may have been running when
it should have
On Monday 28 January 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> Any ideas why this is so noisy and slows down USB device discovery?
Noisy: it should be ehci_dbg() not ehci_info().
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo inf
I'm getting the above error messages a lot in my current USB kernel
tree. I'm guessing it's due to the:
Subject: USB: EHCI: add separate IAA watchdog timer
patch from Alan (as1028) which was based off an earlier patch from
David.
Any ideas why this is so noisy and slows down USB device di
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 06:44:14PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Thank you, I do support what you are doing here. Just the ndiswrapper
> is a special case. But I guess I, as a user, can always use it anyway,
> right? But not the commercial distros. Don't stop the transition on my
> account.
Yes, as
On Mon, Jan 28 2008 at 18:13 +0200, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:44:19PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 25 2008 at 20:02 +0200, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> FYI, this is a patch that will be sent out in the next round to Linus
>>> for inclusio
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:58:55AM +0100, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> >> Greg KH wrote:
> >> > Over two years ago, the Linux USB developers stated that they believed
> >> > there was no way to create a USB kernel dri
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:44:19PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25 2008 at 20:02 +0200, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FYI, this is a patch that will be sent out in the next round to Linus
> > for inclusion in 2.6.25.
> >
> > If anyone has any objections about it, please let me
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> going through old mail
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2007/8/2/154987
>
> I was wondering what supported means in MS parlance. Is runtime
> pm done for these devices by default or does it mean that the driver
> can do it and i
Hi,
going through old mail
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2007/8/2/154987
I was wondering what supported means in MS parlance. Is runtime
pm done for these devices by default or does it mean that the driver
can do it and it'll be only done for whitelisted devices?
Regards
On Fri, Jan 25 2008 at 20:02 +0200, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI, this is a patch that will be sent out in the next round to Linus
> for inclusion in 2.6.25.
>
> If anyone has any objections about it, please let me know.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
What about ndiswrapper and its wi
Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>> > Over two years ago, the Linux USB developers stated that they believed
>> > there was no way to create a USB kernel driver that was not under the
>> > GPL. This patch moves the USB apis to enfo
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > Over two years ago, the Linux USB developers stated that they believed
> > there was no way to create a USB kernel driver that was not under the
> > GPL. This patch moves the USB apis to enforce that decision.
>
Greg KH wrote:
> Over two years ago, the Linux USB developers stated that they believed
> there was no way to create a USB kernel driver that was not under the
> GPL. This patch moves the USB apis to enforce that decision.
>
> There are no known closed source USB drivers in the wild, so this patch
34 matches
Mail list logo
