Re: [PATCH v1] um: fix incompatible argument type in iounmap()

2025-04-09 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, at 19:07, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 16:48, Miguel Ojeda > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:16 AM FUJITA Tomonori >> wrote: >> > >> > Align iounmap() signature with other architectures. >> >> Most indeed have `volatile`, but nios2 and m68k don't --

Re: [PATCH v1] um: fix incompatible argument type in iounmap()

2025-04-09 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Miguel, CC arnd On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 16:48, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:16 AM FUJITA Tomonori > wrote: > > > > Align iounmap() signature with other architectures. > > Most indeed have `volatile`, but nios2 and m68k don't -- Cc'ing them > just in case. Indeed. Apparently

Re: [PATCH v1] um: fix incompatible argument type in iounmap()

2025-04-09 Thread Miguel Ojeda
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:16 AM FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > Align iounmap() signature with other architectures. Most indeed have `volatile`, but nios2 and m68k don't -- Cc'ing them just in case. Cc'ing also the original authors of both sides too. Thanks! Cheers, Miguel

Re: [PATCH v1] um: fix incompatible argument type in iounmap()

2025-04-09 Thread Danilo Krummrich
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Miguel, > > CC arnd > > On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 16:48, Miguel Ojeda > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:16 AM FUJITA Tomonori > > wrote: > > > > > > Align iounmap() signature with other architectures. > > > > Most indeed h