On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 01:12:25PM +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 06:54:49PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-01-27 at 15:30 +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> > > My first approach to getting platform drivers working on UML was by
> > > adding a minimal PCI-
On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 13:12 +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
>
> Yes, Greg was initially totally opposed to the idea of putting platform
> devices under PCI devices, but in his latest email he seemed to
> allow it in some cases. It's still unclear if he'd be OK with a
> "virtual PCI-to-platform b
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 06:54:49PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-01-27 at 15:30 +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> > My first approach to getting platform drivers working on UML was by
> > adding a minimal PCI-to-platform bridge driver, which worked without
> > modifications to virt-pc
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Johannes Berg"
> An: "Vincent Whitchurch" , "richard"
> , "anton ivanov"
>
> CC: r...@kernel.org, devicet...@lists.infradead.org, "linux-um"
> , "linux-kernel"
> , "
On Fri, 2023-01-27 at 15:30 +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> This driver registers PCI busses, but the underlying virtio protocol
> could just as easily be used to provide a platform bus instead. If the
> virtio device node in the devicetree indicates that it's compatible with
> simple-bus, regi
