----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Johannes Berg" <johan...@sipsolutions.net> > An: "Vincent Whitchurch" <vincent.whitchu...@axis.com>, "richard" > <rich...@nod.at>, "anton ivanov" > <anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com> > CC: r...@kernel.org, devicet...@lists.infradead.org, "linux-um" > <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" > <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org>, "kernel" <ker...@axis.com> > Gesendet: Montag, 13. Februar 2023 18:54:49 > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] virt-pci: add platform bus support
> On Fri, 2023-01-27 at 15:30 +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote: >> This driver registers PCI busses, but the underlying virtio protocol >> could just as easily be used to provide a platform bus instead. If the >> virtio device node in the devicetree indicates that it's compatible with >> simple-bus, register platform devices instead of handling it as a PCI >> bus. >> >> Only one platform bus is allowed and the logic MMIO region for the >> platform bus is placed at an arbitrarily-chosen address away from the >> PCI region. > > So ... hm. I'm not sure I _like_ this so much. It feels decidedly > strange to put it this way. > > But it looks like Richard already applied it, so I suppose look at this > as kind of a retroactive information gathering. :) I liked the idea, the patch made sense, so yes. But this does not mean that things can't be changed. Until we release 6.3 we have time. Thanks, //richard _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
