Hi, Ewan, Hannes:
On 10/09/2013 08:28 PM, Ewan Milne wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 15:43 +0800, Ren Mingxin wrote:
The former minimum valid value of 'eh_deadline' is 1s, which means
the earliest occasion to shorten EH is 1 second later since a
command is failed or timed out. But if we want to sk
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:24:08PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 20:55 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Why not add a minimum number to pci_enable_msix(), i.e.:
> >
> > pci_enable_msix(pdev, msix_entries, nvec, minvec)
> >
> > ... which means "nvec" is the number of
The purpose of this InfiniBand SRP initiator patch series is as follows:
- Make the SRP initiator driver better suited for use in a H.A. setup.
Add fast_io_fail_tmo, dev_loss_tmo and reconnect_delay parameters.
With the default values of these parameters failover happens
significantly faster
Keep the rport data structure around after srp_remove_host() has
finished until cleanup of the IB transport layer has finished
completely. This is necessary because later patches use the rport
pointer inside the queuecommand callback. Without this patch
accessing the rport from inside a queuecomman
Add the necessary functions in the SRP transport module to allow
an SRP initiator driver to implement transport layer error handling
similar to the functionality already provided by the FC transport
layer. This includes:
- Support for implementing fast_io_fail_tmo, the time that should
elapse aft
Add support for periodically reconnecting to an SRP target until
the dev_loss timer expires. After the tenth reconnection attempt,
gradually slow down subsequent reconnect attempts.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche
Cc: David Dillow
Cc: Roland Dreier
Cc: James Bottomley
Cc: Vu Pham
Cc: Sebastian
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:48:39PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
>
> pci_enable_msix() may fail, but it can not return a positive number.
>
That is true according to the current logic but the comment on top of
pci_enable_msix() still says:
"A return of < 0 indicates a failure. Or a return of >
Fix crash after xri limit is reached.
Signed-off-by: James Smart
---
lpfc_scsi.c | 19 ---
lpfc_sli4.h |1 +
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.
Fixed spinlock inversion problem.
Signed-off-by: James Smart
---
lpfc_sli.c |9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c 2013-10-09 10:39:20.0 -0400
Fixed invalid mailbox timeouts
Signed-off-by: James Smart
---
lpfc_sli.c | 112 +
1 file changed, 112 insertions(+)
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
Fixed invalid Total_Data_Placed value received for els and ct command responses
Signed-off-by: James Smart
---
lpfc_hw4.h |6 --
lpfc_sli.c | 38 --
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h b/d
Fixed invalid fcp_rsp length fir FCP_ICMND
Signed-off-by: James Smart
---
lpfc_hw4.h | 24 +---
lpfc_sli.c | 19 ++-
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hw4.h
--- a/driv
Fixed spinlock hang.
Signed-off-by: James Smart
---
lpfc_hbadisc.c |8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c 2013-10-09 10:39:20.0 -0400
+
Fixed not processing task management IOCB response status
This patch implements the changes requested by Jeremy Linton:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=136242124409687&w=2
The patch revises the command issuing behavior, detecting cases where the
Task Mgmt command may have completed but with a no
Update lpfc version to driver version 8.3.43
Signed-off-by: James Smart
---
lpfc_version.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_version.h b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_version.h
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_version.h 2013-10-09 10:39:20.0
This patch set updates the lpfc driver to revision 8.3.43
The patches for 8.3.43 contain:
- Fix crash after xri limit is reached.
- Fixed spinlock inversion problem.
- Fixed invalid mailbox timeouts
- Fixed invalid fcp_rsp length fir FCP_ICMND
- Fixed invalid Total_Data_Placed value received for
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 08:34:51AM -0500, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 03:22:19PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> > On 09/23/2013 08:34 PM, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
> > > From: Stephen M. Cameron
> > >
> > > SCSI mid layer doesn't seem to handle logical drives undergoi
On 10/10/2013 03:17 AM, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:24:08PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> Ok, this suggestion sounded in one or another form by several people.
> What about name it pcim_enable_msix_range() and wrap in couple more
> helpers to complete an API:
>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62811
Bug ID: 62811
Summary: Don't Modify the scsi subcmd as LUN value when using
VENDOR cmd
Product: SCSI Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 3.12rc4
Hardware: All
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 17:22 +, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62811
>
> Bug ID: 62811
>Summary: Don't Modify the scsi subcmd as LUN value when using
> VENDOR cmd
>Product: SCSI Dri
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:28:27AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 03:17 AM, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:24:08PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > Ok, this suggestion sounded in one or another form by several people.
> > What about name it pcim_e
> What is the criteria for patches to include in your tree? I would suggest
> to consider this one https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/9/90 if it fits.
For this one you probably want to send a patch to Jens to move blk-mq-tag.h
to include/linux first instead of doing the relative include hack.
Also the
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:17:14PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > What is the criteria for patches to include in your tree? I would suggest
> > to consider this one https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/9/90 if it fits.
>
> For this one you probably want to send a patch to Jens to move blk-mq-tag.h
>
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 09:29:06 -0600
> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
>> [+cc linux-pci]
>>
>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Joe Lawrence
>> wrote:
>> > From 84ac7a35ebd61e84d4254eae78bb967de17254c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
>> > 2001 From: Joe Lawrence
Just to help us all understand "the loop" issue..
Here's an example of driver code which uses the existing MSI-X interfaces,
for a device which can work with either 16, 8, 4, 2, or 1 MSI-X interrupt.
This is from a new driver I'm working on right now:
static int xx_alloc_msix_irqs (struct xx_dev
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> The data byte count field of PRDT indicates the length of data block
> which is a segment of data transfer for SCSI commands. The value of
> this field shall have Dword granularity and the the maximum of length
> is 256KB.
>
> This adjusts dm
26 matches
Mail list logo
