On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:20:46AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > @@ -1656,7 +1657,7 @@ static inline int reconnect_target(struct NCR_ESP
> > *esp, struct ESP_regs *eregs)
> > if(!(it & me))
> > return -1;
> > it &= ~me;
> > -
Erez Zilber wrote:
> I'm running sgp_dd (on RHAS 4 up4 - kernel version is 2.6.9), so it
> calls scsi-ml directly (without going through ll_rw_blk).
...
> I guess that the max_sectors value is never used. Am I right?
I have no idea. However you might be able to track how max_sectors
trickles thr
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, James Pearson wrote:
> I have two LTO-3 (QUANTUM ULTRIUM 3) drives attached to a dual Adaptec U160
> controller (one per SCSI host) on a Dell PE2850 running a RHEL4 based kernel
> (2.6.9 based).
>
> I'm trying to read (with tar) LTO-3 tapes written on another system (possibly
Currently, the iSCSI driver returns the data transfer residual for
data-in commands (e.g. read) but not data-out commands (e.g. write).
This patch makes it return the data transfer residual for both types of
commands.
Signed-off-by: Tony Battersby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- linux-2.6.24-rc2/drive
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 02:34:53PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> gdth driver is modified NOT to use scp->eh_timeout. Now, it has
> eh_timed_out (gdth_timed_out) to handle command timeouts for locked
> I/O's. Have not tested as I don't have needed hardware! Patch is
> against 2.6.23-mm1.
Looks
I have two LTO-3 (QUANTUM ULTRIUM 3) drives attached to a dual Adaptec
U160 controller (one per SCSI host) on a Dell PE2850 running a RHEL4
based kernel (2.6.9 based).
I'm trying to read (with tar) LTO-3 tapes written on another system
(possibly an SGI IRIX box), but I'm getting extremely vari
Stefan Richter wrote:
Erez Zilber wrote:
> I'm not sure that I understand the meaning of max_sectors in
> scsi_host_template.
Did you have a look at scsi_mid_low_api.txt?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_api.txt;h=6f70f2b9
On Tue, Nov 06 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> gdth driver is modified NOT to use scp->eh_timeout. Now, it has
> eh_timed_out (gdth_timed_out) to handle command timeouts for locked
> I/O's. Have not tested as I don't have needed hardware! Patch is
> against 2.6.23-mm1.
I updated the timeout patch
On Wed, Nov 07 2007 at 20:06 +0200, Tony Battersby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, the iSCSI driver returns the data transfer residual for
> data-in commands (e.g. read) but not data-out commands (e.g. write).
> This patch makes it return the data transfer residual for both types of
> comma
Christoph Hellwig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sez:
> Did anyone run the driver through sparse to see if we have
> more issues like this?
There are some warnings from sparse, none like this one. I will deal
with the warnings ...
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 12:06:39PM -0700, Yang, Bo wrote:
> The fast_load parameter is for the user to decide at driver load time if
> (s)he wants to skip scan of devices in PD channels.
> After driver is loaded the user cannot be permitted to modify this
> value. If the user needs to see the devic
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 02:40:54PM -0500, Tony Battersby wrote:
> The following commit changed the pointer passed to request_irq(), but
> failed to change the pointer passed to free_irq():
Looks good.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 12:04:31PM -0700, Yang, Bo wrote:
> I see that scsi_scan_host_selected is in scsi_priv.h and currently is
> not used by any other driver. The scsi_priv.h is not part of the include
> dir (/include/scsi). One of the major Linux distro's don't even include
> this file in /usr/
Good point, thanks. The intent of the management applications
utilization of this AIF report is to observe the LSB of the value of
integer value in BlinkLED. The actions of the cpu_to_le32 actually
breaks this and reports the wrong content in swapped architectures.
This attached follow-up patch is
Erez Zilber wrote:
Stefan Richter wrote:
Erez Zilber wrote:
I'm not sure that I understand the meaning of max_sectors in
scsi_host_template.
Did you have a look at scsi_mid_low_api.txt?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/scsi/scsi_mid_low_ap
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 19:12:27 +0200
Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 02:05:39AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> > This patchset convert the PPC64 IOMMU to use the iova code for free
> > area management.
> >
> > The IOMMUs ignores low level drivers' restriction
sym53c8xx prints a negotiation message after every check condition.
This can add up to a lot of messages for removable-medium devices
(CD-ROM, tape drives, etc.) that are being polled, since they return
check condition when no medium is present. This patch suppresses the
negotiation message if it
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Thanks for the iscsi bits. We have the libiscsi part from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] queued for 2.6.25. And the iscsi_tcp parts you
are patching over are broken and I am going to fix that for 2.6.25. We
only support 1 r2
This patch fixes the sym53c8xx "setflag" user command to control
disconnect privilege, which has been broken for a long time.
Signed-off-by: Tony Battersby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
NOTE regarding the following change:
can_disconnect = (cp->tag != NO_TAG) ||
- (lp && (lp->cur
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07 2007 at 20:06 +0200, Tony Battersby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Currently, the iSCSI driver returns the data transfer residual for
data-in commands (e.g. read) but not data-out commands (e.g. write).
This patch makes it return the data transfer residual for both
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:58:12AM -0500, Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> Good point, thanks. The intent of the management applications
> utilization of this AIF report is to observe the LSB of the value of
> integer value in BlinkLED. The actions of the cpu_to_le32 actually
> breaks this and reports the wr
James Bottomley wrote:
Please don't drop the cc lists. There are others who probably have more
informed opinions than I do who won't get to comment if they don't see
it.
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 17:36 -0700, Anthony Ewell wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 13:21 -0700, Anthony E
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:16:19 +0200
Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - If we export scsi_init_io()/scsi_release_buffers() instead of
> scsi_{alloc,free}_sgtable() from scsi_lib than tgt code is
> much more insulated from scsi_lib changes. As a bonus it will
> also gain bid
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:38:33 +0200
Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06 2007 at 20:25 +0200, Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >> [1]
> >> I propose a small change to scsi_tgt_lib.c that will make
> >> tgt completely neutral to the scsi_data_buf
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:19:32 +0200
Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In preparation for bidi we abstract all IO members of scsi_cmnd,
> that will need to duplicate, into a substructure.
>
> - Group all IO members of scsi_cmnd into a scsi_data_buffer
> structure.
> - Adjust
25 matches
Mail list logo
