On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:20:46AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > @@ -1656,7 +1657,7 @@ static inline int reconnect_target(struct NCR_ESP
> > *esp, struct ESP_regs *eregs)
> > if(!(it & me))
> > return -1;
> > it &= ~me;
> > - if(it & (it - 1))
> > + if(!is_power_of_2(it))
> > return -1;
>
> Non-equivalent transform. Probably a bug.
>
> > bits &= ~esp->scsi_id_mask;
> > - if (!bits || (bits & (bits - 1)))
> > + if (!is_power_of_2(bits))
> > goto do_reset;
>
> Non-equivalent transform. Definitely a bug.
>
> > iscsi_set_param(cls_conn, param, buf, buflen);
> > - if (session->max_r2t & (session->max_r2t - 1))
> > + if (!is_power_of_2(session->max_r2t))
> > session->max_r2t = roundup_pow_of_two(session->max_r2t);
>
> Non-equivalent transform. Not sure if it's a bug or not.
>
> >
> > - if (cmds_max < 2 || (cmds_max & (cmds_max - 1)) ||
> > + if (cmds_max < 2 || !is_power_of_2(cmds_max) ||
> > cmds_max >= ISCSI_MGMT_ITT_OFFSET) {
>
> This one's OK.
so, of the above, which can safely be rewritten using
"[!]is_power_of_2"? and, for now, let's leave out the ones that would
semantically make more sense to be testing for single-bitness -- i'll
try to sneak in a macro like that in the next merge window.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
