Re: [PATCH 10/21] [SCSI] nsp32: use mdelay instead of large udelay constants

2013-05-01 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:21 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 26 April 2013, Masanori Goto wrote: > > 2013/4/25 Arnd Bergmann > > > > > > ARM cannot handle udelay for more than 2 miliseconds, so we > > > should use mdelay instead for those. > > > > > > > Singed-off-by: GOTO Masanori > >

Re: [PATCH 10/21] [SCSI] nsp32: use mdelay instead of large udelay constants

2013-04-29 Thread Masanori Goto
Oops, you're absolutely correct. Thanks for the follow up! Please change it as follow as you mentioned: Acked-by: GOTO Masanori Best regrads, -- gotom 2013/4/29 Arnd Bergmann : > On Friday 26 April 2013, Masanori Goto wrote: >> 2013/4/25 Arnd Bergmann >> > >> > ARM cannot handle udelay for m

Re: [PATCH 10/21] [SCSI] nsp32: use mdelay instead of large udelay constants

2013-04-29 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 26 April 2013, Masanori Goto wrote: > 2013/4/25 Arnd Bergmann > > > > ARM cannot handle udelay for more than 2 miliseconds, so we > > should use mdelay instead for those. > > > > Singed-off-by: GOTO Masanori Thanks. I assume you mean "Acked-by", not "Singed-off" as in "burnt" or "Sign

Re: [PATCH 10/21] [SCSI] nsp32: use mdelay instead of large udelay constants

2013-04-25 Thread Masanori Goto
2013/4/25 Arnd Bergmann > > ARM cannot handle udelay for more than 2 miliseconds, so we > should use mdelay instead for those. > Singed-off-by: GOTO Masanori > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > Cc: GOTO Masanori > Cc: YOKOTA Hiroshi > Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" > Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH 10/21] [SCSI] nsp32: use mdelay instead of large udelay constants

2013-04-25 Thread Arnd Bergmann
ARM cannot handle udelay for more than 2 miliseconds, so we should use mdelay instead for those. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Cc: GOTO Masanori Cc: YOKOTA Hiroshi Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/scsi/nsp32.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 delet