>On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Sagi Grimberg
>wrote:
>>On 10/8/2014 3:41 AM, Jay Kallickal wrote:
>>From: Jayamohan Kallickal
>> This patch allows the underlying hardware to choose
>>values other than hard coded max values for cqe and send_wr
>>while preventing them from exceeding max
On 10/9/2014 8:14 AM, Jayamohan.K wrote:
Hi Minh and Jayamohan,
So I agree that we would want to take device capabilities into account
here, but we need to be able to adjust scsi_cmds_max (can_queue) in case
the max wqe supported is lower than scsi_cmds_max * num_posts_per_cmd.
On 10/8/2014 3:41 AM, Jay Kallickal wrote:
From: Jayamohan Kallickal
This patch allows the underlying hardware to choose
values other than hard coded max values for cqe and send_wr
while preventing them from exceeding max supported values.
Hi Minh and Jayamohan,
So I agree that we w
From: Jayamohan Kallickal
This patch allows the underlying hardware to choose
values other than hard coded max values for cqe and send_wr
while preventing them from exceeding max supported values.
Signed-off-by: Minh Tran
Signed-off-by: Jayamohan Kallickal
---
drivers/infiniband/ulp
4 matches
Mail list logo