>On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sa...@dev.mellanox.co.il> 
>wrote:
>>On 10/8/2014 3:41 AM, Jay Kallickal wrote:
>>From: Jayamohan Kallickal <jayamoh...@gmail.com>

>>      This patch allows the underlying hardware to choose
>>values other than  hard coded max values for cqe and send_wr
>>while preventing them from exceeding max supported values.

>Hi Minh and Jayamohan,

>So I agree that we would want to take device capabilities into account
>here, but we need to be able to adjust scsi_cmds_max (can_queue) in case
>the max wqe supported is lower than scsi_cmds_max * num_posts_per_cmd.


I feel we should be fine as long as we support the max_cmds of 128 supported by 
open-iscsi layer.

I see the iser layer uses a value of 512 though it only serves as a limit 
check. 


>So generally I agree with this approach, but we need to take care of
>stuff later when the session is created.

>One more thing, this is not rebased on the latest iser patches please
>send v1 on top of: http://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=141216135013146&w=2

Yes, I will recreate the patch and send on top of this


Resending:
 Looks like my response got dropped by the filters.

Am travelling . Minh is working on the patches and would respond 
-Jay
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to