On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:48 AM, javier Martin
wrote:
> However, it would be great if Fabio could confirm that codadx6 in the
> i.MX27 supports MJPG too.
As far as I recall it does not. I will check it and if I heard
differently I will reply back here.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
--
To unsubscribe
On 2 July 2012 13:13, javier Martin wrote:
> On 2 July 2012 12:54, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:36:46PM +0200, javier Martin wrote:
>>> Hi Sascha,
>>> I almost have a final version ready which includes multi-instance
>>> support (not tested though) [1]. As I stated, we assume
On 2 July 2012 12:54, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:36:46PM +0200, javier Martin wrote:
>> Hi Sascha,
>> I almost have a final version ready which includes multi-instance
>> support (not tested though) [1]. As I stated, we assumed the extra
>> effort of looking at your code in [
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:36:46PM +0200, javier Martin wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
> I almost have a final version ready which includes multi-instance
> support (not tested though) [1]. As I stated, we assumed the extra
> effort of looking at your code in [2] in order to provide a mechanism
> that preserv
Hi Sascha,
I almost have a final version ready which includes multi-instance
support (not tested though) [1]. As I stated, we assumed the extra
effort of looking at your code in [2] in order to provide a mechanism
that preserves compatibility between VPUs in i.MX21, i.MX51 and
i.MX53. This is the o
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 04:25:54PM +0200, javier Martin wrote:
> Do you plan to add pinctrl support for i.MX27 and i.MX21?
>
We will have to when we are there to convert these platforms over to DT.
--
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
th
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:25:50PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 04:10:27PM +0200, javier Martin wrote:
> > If I drop this platform data it is OK with you if I don't add device
> > tree support by now?
> >
> I'm fine. Sascha?
Fine with me.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:56:37PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:31:48PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Moving to irqdomain without DT is really very easy, you just need to
> > select a legacy mapping if a base is provided and otherwise all the code
> > is identical - it just
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 04:10:27PM +0200, javier Martin wrote:
> If I drop this platform data it is OK with you if I don't add device
> tree support by now?
>
I'm fine. Sascha?
--
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message
On 20 June 2012 15:09, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:00:15AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> The approach a lot of platforms have been taking is that it's OK to keep
>> on maintaining existing boards using board files (especially for trivial
>> things like adding new devices).
>
> I th
Hi,
On 20 June 2012 16:03, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:00:15AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> The approach a lot of platforms have been taking is that it's OK to keep
>> on maintaining existing boards using board files (especially for trivial
>> things like adding new devices).
>
>
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:00:15AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> The approach a lot of platforms have been taking is that it's OK to keep
> on maintaining existing boards using board files (especially for trivial
> things like adding new devices).
If the device is added without introducing any platfo
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:31:48PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I think that's the approach being taken during the transition to device
> > tree. But it's definitely a desirable thing to remove those board
> > files with device tree support at some point, because not having non-DT
> > users will e
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:09:43PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:00:15AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The approach a lot of platforms have been taking is that it's OK to keep
> > on maintaining existing boards using board files (especially for trivial
> > things like adding n
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:00:15AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> The approach a lot of platforms have been taking is that it's OK to keep
> on maintaining existing boards using board files (especially for trivial
> things like adding new devices).
I think that's the approach being taken during the tr
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:01:26AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0200, javier Martin wrote:
> > Our platfrom, 'visstrim_m10' doesn't currently support devicetree yet,
> > so it would be highly difficult for us to test it at the moment.
> > Couldn't you add device
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0200, javier Martin wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
> thank you for your review.
>
> >
> > Since we all move to devicetree shouldn't we stop adding new
> > platform devices?
>
> Our platfrom, 'visstrim_m10' doesn't currently support devicetree yet,
> so it would be highly
Hi Fabio,
On 20 June 2012 05:26, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Javier Martin
> wrote:
>> This patch adds support for the video encoder present
>> in the i.MX27. It currently support encoding in H.264 and
>> in MPEG4 SP. It's working properly in a Visstri
Hi Javier,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Javier Martin
wrote:
> This patch adds support for the video encoder present
> in the i.MX27. It currently support encoding in H.264 and
> in MPEG4 SP. It's working properly in a Visstrim SM10 platform.
> It uses V4L2-mem2mem framework.
>
> A public gi
19 matches
Mail list logo
