On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:34:34 +0100, Daro wrote:
> W dniu 14.03.2010 09:26, Jean Delvare pisze:
> > It will be easier with the kernel you compiled yourself. First of all,
> > download the patch from:
> > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/75883/raw/
> >
> > Then, move to the source directory of your
W dniu 14.03.2010 09:26, Jean Delvare pisze:
Hi Daro,
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:38:11 +0100, Daro wrote:
Hi Jean,
I am back and ready to go :)
As I am not much experienced Linux user I would apprieciate some more
details:
I have few linux kernels installed; which one should I test or it does
Hi Daro,
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:38:11 +0100, Daro wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> I am back and ready to go :)
> As I am not much experienced Linux user I would apprieciate some more
> details:
>
> I have few linux kernels installed; which one should I test or it does
> not matter?
> 2.6.31-14-generic
>
Am Sonntag, den 14.03.2010, 03:38 +0100 schrieb Daro:
> Hi Jean,
>
> I am back and ready to go :)
> As I am not much experienced Linux user I would apprieciate some more
> details:
>
> I have few linux kernels installed; which one should I test or it does
> not matter?
> 2.6.31-14-generic
> 2.
Hi Jean,
I am back and ready to go :)
As I am not much experienced Linux user I would apprieciate some more
details:
I have few linux kernels installed; which one should I test or it does
not matter?
2.6.31-14-generic
2.6.31-16-generic
2.6.31-17-generic
2.6.31-19-generic
2.6.31-20-generic
a
Hi Daro,
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:19:38 +0100, Daro wrote:
> I did not forget I had offered to test the patch however I am now on vacation
> skiing so I will get back to you as soon I am back home.
Are you back home by now? We are still waiting for your test results.
We can't push the patch upstre
Hi Jean,
Am Donnerstag, den 25.02.2010, 14:12 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:07:05 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> > Are you still waiting for Daro's report?
>
> Yes, I am still waiting. Unfortunately neither Daro nor Roman reported
> any test result so far. Now, if we go for
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:07:05 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> Are you still waiting for Daro's report?
Yes, I am still waiting. Unfortunately neither Daro nor Roman reported
any test result so far. Now, if we go for my second patch, I guess we
might as well apply it right now. It only affects this o
Am Montag, den 15.02.2010, 06:31 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> Am Donnerstag, den 11.02.2010, 01:58 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, den 10.02.2010, 20:36 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:40:03 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > > Jean De
Am Donnerstag, den 11.02.2010, 01:58 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.02.2010, 20:36 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:40:03 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > > Under the assumption that saa7134_hwinit1() only touch
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 10.02.2010, 20:36 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:40:03 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > Under the assumption that saa7134_hwinit1() only touches GPIOs
> > > connected to IR receivers (and it certainly looks like this to me
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:40:03 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Under the assumption that saa7134_hwinit1() only touches GPIOs
> > connected to IR receivers (and it certainly looks like this to me) I
> > fail to see how these pins not being initialized could have any effe
Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Sorry for the late answer. I'm tracking so many things in parallel...
No problem.
>> What happens is that the saa7134_board_init1(dev) code has lots of gpio
>> codes,
>> and most of those code is needed in order to enable i2c bridges or to turn
>> on/reset
Hi Mauro,
Sorry for the late answer. I'm tracking so many things in parallel...
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:50:11 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The init1 code has 107 boards listed:
>
> SAA7134_BOARD_10MOONSTVMASTER3
> SAA7134_BOARD_ADS_DUO_CARDBUS_PTV331
> SAA7134_BOARD_ASUST
> SAA7134_BOARD
Hi Mauro,
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:09:05 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > From: Jean Delvare
> > Subject: saa7134: Fix IR support of some ASUS TV-FM 7135 variants
> >
> > Some variants of the ASUS TV-FM 7135 are handled as the ASUSTeK P7131
> > Analog (card=146). However, by the time we fin
Hi Daro,
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:38:18 +0100, Daro wrote:
> If some tests on my machine could be helpfull just let me know.
Definitely. If you could please test both patches I sent (first one on
2010-01-27, second one on 2010-01-30, both should be in your mailbox)
and confirm that they both work f
W dniu 03.02.2010 00:32, hermann pitton pisze:
Hi Jean, Mauro and all,
Am Dienstag, den 02.02.2010, 08:54 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
Hi Hermann,
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:47:53 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
Hi Jean,
Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 10:56 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
Hi Jean, Mauro and all,
Am Dienstag, den 02.02.2010, 08:54 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> Hi Hermann,
>
> On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:47:53 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 10:56 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> > > Hi Hermann,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 01 Feb 2010
Hi Jean,
> From: Jean Delvare
> Subject: saa7134: Fix IR support of some ASUS TV-FM 7135 variants
>
> Some variants of the ASUS TV-FM 7135 are handled as the ASUSTeK P7131
> Analog (card=146). However, by the time we find out, some
> card-specific initialization is missed. In particular, the fac
Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Hermann,
>
> On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:47:53 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
>> Hi Jean,
>>
>> Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 10:56 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
>>> Hi Hermann,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:16:35 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
For now, I only faked a P7131 Dual w
Hi Hermann,
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:47:53 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 10:56 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> > Hi Hermann,
> >
> > On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:16:35 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> > > For now, I only faked a P7131 Dual with a broken IR receiver o
Hi Jean,
Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 10:56 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> Hi Hermann,
>
> On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:16:35 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> > For now, I only faked a P7131 Dual with a broken IR receiver on a 2.6.29
> > with recent, you can see that gpio 0x4 doesn't go high, but your
>
Hi Hermann,
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:16:35 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> For now, I only faked a P7131 Dual with a broken IR receiver on a 2.6.29
> with recent, you can see that gpio 0x4 doesn't go high, but your
> patch should enable the remote on that P7131 analog only.
I'm not sure why you
Hi all interested,
Am Samstag, den 30.01.2010, 11:56 +0100 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> Hi Mauro, Hermann,
>
> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:47:41 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 29.01.2010, 13:40 -0200 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> > > Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > > From: Jean Delvare
> >
Hi Mauro, Hermann,
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:47:41 +0100, hermann pitton wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 29.01.2010, 13:40 -0200 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> > Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > From: Jean Delvare
> > > Subject: saa7134: Fix IR support of some ASUS TV-FM 7135 variants
> > >
> > > Some variants
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 29.01.2010, 13:40 -0200 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > From: Jean Delvare
> > Subject: saa7134: Fix IR support of some ASUS TV-FM 7135 variants
> >
> > Some variants of the ASUS TV-FM 7135 are handled as the ASUSTeK P7131
> > Analog (card=146). Howev
Jean Delvare wrote:
> From: Jean Delvare
> Subject: saa7134: Fix IR support of some ASUS TV-FM 7135 variants
>
> Some variants of the ASUS TV-FM 7135 are handled as the ASUSTeK P7131
> Analog (card=146). However, by the time we find out, some
> card-specific initialization is missed. In particula
From: Jean Delvare
Subject: saa7134: Fix IR support of some ASUS TV-FM 7135 variants
Some variants of the ASUS TV-FM 7135 are handled as the ASUSTeK P7131
Analog (card=146). However, by the time we find out, some
card-specific initialization is missed. In particular, the fact that
the IR is GPIO-
28 matches
Mail list logo
