On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 11:01 -0300, Gonzalo A. de la Vega wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:22 -0300, Gonzalo de la Vega wrote:
> >> The tunner IF for PAL-Nc norm, which AFAIK is used only in Argentina, was
> >> being defined as equal to PAL-M
Hola ;)
>
> From other discussions we've had at the ML, it seems that devices sold in
> Argentina with analog tuners sometimes come with a NTSC tuner, and sometimes
> come with an European PAL tuner. They solve the frequency shifts that
> happen there via some tda9887 (and/or tuner-simple) adjustm
Buenos dias Gonzalo,
Em 20-04-2012 11:01, Gonzalo A. de la Vega escreveu:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:22 -0300, Gonzalo de la Vega wrote:
>>> The tunner IF for PAL-Nc norm, which AFAIK is used only in Argentina, was
>>> being defined as equal
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:22 -0300, Gonzalo de la Vega wrote:
>> The tunner IF for PAL-Nc norm, which AFAIK is used only in Argentina, was
>> being defined as equal to PAL-M but it is not. It actually uses the same
>> video IF as PAL-BG (and un
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:22 -0300, Gonzalo de la Vega wrote:
> The tunner IF for PAL-Nc norm, which AFAIK is used only in Argentina, was
> being defined as equal to PAL-M but it is not. It actually uses the same
> video IF as PAL-BG (and unlike PAL-M) but the audio is at 4.5MHz (same as
> PAL-M)
The tunner IF for PAL-Nc norm, which AFAIK is used only in Argentina, was being
defined as equal to PAL-M but it is not. It actually uses the same video IF as
PAL-BG (and unlike PAL-M) but the audio is at 4.5MHz (same as PAL-M). A
separate structure member was added for PAL-Nc.
Signed-off-by: G
