In selftests/amd-pstate, distro `perf` is used to capture `perf stat`
while running microbenchmarks. Distro `perf` is not working with
upstream kernel. Fixed this by providing an option to give the perf
binary path.
Signed-off-by: Swapnil Sapkal
---
tools/testing/selftests/amd-pstate/gitsource.s
In selftests/amd-pstate, tbench and gitsource microbenchmarks are
used to compare the performance with different governors. In Current
implementation relative path to run `amd_pstate_tracer.py` are broken.
Fixed this by using absolute paths.
Signed-off-by: Swapnil Sapkal
---
.../x86/amd_pstate_t
This series fixes issues observed with selftests/amd-pstate while
running performance comparison tests with different governors. First
patch changes relative paths with absolute path and also change it
with correct path wherever it is broken.
The second patch adds an option to provide perf binary p
add -y/-Y options to support PTP_SYS_OFFSET_ANY2 op. where -y represents
samples to collect while -Y is to choose the timebase from available
options of cycles, real, mono, or raw.
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar
CC: Shuah Khan
CC: Richard Cochran
CC: "David S. Miller"
CC: Rahul Rameshbabu
CC:
We have a new conditional operations related ISA extensions so let us
add these extensions to get-reg-list test.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones
---
.../testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/t
We have a new smstateen registers as separate sub-type of CSR ONE_REG
interface so let us add these registers to get-reg-list test.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones
---
.../selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c| 34 +++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
d
We have a new senvcfg register in the general CSR ONE_REG interface
so let us add it to get-reg-list test.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/
We extend the KVM ISA extension ONE_REG interface to allow KVM
user space to detect and enable Zicond extension for Guest/VM.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones
---
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_onereg.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(
The RISC-V integer conditional (Zicond) operation extension defines
standard conditional arithmetic and conditional-select/move operations
which are inspired from the XVentanaCondOps extension. In fact, QEMU
RISC-V also has support for emulating Zicond extension.
Let us detect Zicond extension fro
Add an entry for the Zicond extension to the riscv,isa-extensions property.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetr
This series extends KVM RISC-V to allow Guest/VM discover and use
conditional operations related ISA extensions (namely XVentanaCondOps
and Zicond).
To try these patches, use KVMTOOL from riscv_zbx_zicntr_smstateen_condops_v1
branch at: https://github.com/avpatel/kvmtool.git
These patches are bas
On Mon, 2023-10-02 at 20:49 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 05:59:25PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > The 08/23/2023 14:11, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > > > and there is user code doing raw clone threads (such threads
> > > > are
> > > > technically not allowed to call into lib
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 05:59:25PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> The 08/23/2023 14:11, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > and there is user code doing raw clone threads (such threads are
> > > technically not allowed to call into libc) it's not immediately
> > > clear to me if having gcs in those thread
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 6:43 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> On 02.10.23 17:55, Lokesh Gidra wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:46 PM Lokesh Gidra wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:21 PM Peter Xu wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 10:00:03AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
On 02.10.23 17:55, Lokesh Gidra wrote:
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:46 PM Lokesh Gidra wrote:
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:21 PM Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 10:00:03AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
In case we cannot simply remap the page, the fallback sequence (from the
cover letter)
On 10/2/23 06:06, Pierre Gondois wrote:
Hello Waiman,
I could test the patch using the for-next branch in your tree.
Just a NIT, it seemed that the message indicating the reason
the isolated configuration was invalid is not printed anymore:
Commands:
# mkdir cgroup
# mount -t cgroup2 none cgrou
On 02.10.23 19:33, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 02.10.23 17:21, Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 10:00:03AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
In case we cannot simply remap the page, the fallback sequence (from the
cover letter) would be triggered.
1) UFFDIO_COPY
2) MADV_DONTNEED
So we wo
On 02.10.23 17:21, Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 10:00:03AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
In case we cannot simply remap the page, the fallback sequence (from the
cover letter) would be triggered.
1) UFFDIO_COPY
2) MADV_DONTNEED
So we would just handle the operation internally with
On 02.10.23 17:23, Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 04:42:50PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 23.09.23 03:31, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
From: Andrea Arcangeli
As far as the rmap code is concerned, UFFDIO_REMAP only alters the
page->mapping and page->index. It does it while holding
On 30.09.2023 10:58, David Gow wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 06:02, Michal Wajdeczko
> wrote:
>>
>> The existing macro KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM can produce parameter
>> generator function but only when we fully know the definition
>> of the array. However, there might be cases where we would like
>
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:46 PM Lokesh Gidra wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:21 PM Peter Xu wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 10:00:03AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > In case we cannot simply remap the page, the fallback sequence (from the
> > > cover letter) would be triggered.
>
On 10/2/2023 4:31 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2023, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>
>> Fix four issues with resctrl selftests.
>>
>> The signal handling fix became necessary after the mount/umount fixes
>> and the uninitialized member bug was discovered during the review.
>>
>> The other tw
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:21 PM Peter Xu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 10:00:03AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > In case we cannot simply remap the page, the fallback sequence (from the
> > cover letter) would be triggered.
> >
> > 1) UFFDIO_COPY
> > 2) MADV_DONTNEED
> >
> > So we would j
Hi Ilpo,
On 10/2/2023 2:48 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> signal_handler_unregister() calls sigaction() with uninitializing
> sa_flags in the struct sigaction.
>
> Make sure sa_flags is always initialized in signal_handler_unregister()
> by initializing the struct sigaction when declaring it. Also ad
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 11:57 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 09:23:37AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > The Veyron-V1 CPU supports custom conditional arithmetic and
> > conditional-select/move operations referred to as XVentanaCondOps
> > extension. In fact, QEMU RISC-V also h
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 04:42:50PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 23.09.23 03:31, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > From: Andrea Arcangeli
> >
> > As far as the rmap code is concerned, UFFDIO_REMAP only alters the
> > page->mapping and page->index. It does it while holding the page
> > lock. Ho
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 10:00:03AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> In case we cannot simply remap the page, the fallback sequence (from the
> cover letter) would be triggered.
>
> 1) UFFDIO_COPY
> 2) MADV_DONTNEED
>
> So we would just handle the operation internally without a fallback.
Note th
On Sep 26 2023, Justin Stitt wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Gentle ping on this patch. Looking to get this patch and [1] slated
> for 6.7 wherein we can start getting cleaner kselftests builds.
>
> I do not think I am able to successfully run the hid/bpf selftests due
> to my kernel version being too low
On 23.09.23 03:31, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
From: Andrea Arcangeli
As far as the rmap code is concerned, UFFDIO_REMAP only alters the
page->mapping and page->index. It does it while holding the page
lock. However folio_referenced() is doing rmap walks without taking the
folio lock first, so fo
On 10/2/23 05:46, Abhinav wrote:
Some tests like dma, ia64, etc. were not present in top level of
selftest Makefile, so when someone ran 'make run_tests' they would miss
these tests. This patches adds those left out tests.
Signed-off-by: Abhinav
---
I removed sched, safesetid and filelock from
On 28.09.2023 22:54, Rae Moar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:58 PM Michal Wajdeczko
> wrote:
>>
>> In case of parameterized tests we are not providing a test plan
>> so we can't detect if any result is missing.
>>
>> Count available params using the same generator as during a test
>> execut
On 28.09.2023 22:53, Rae Moar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:58 PM Michal Wajdeczko
> wrote:
>>
>> When running parametrized test cases, diagnostic messages
>> are not properly aligned with the test result lines:
>>
>> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output \
>> --kun
On 28.09.2023 22:52, Rae Moar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:58 PM Michal Wajdeczko
> wrote:
>>
>> A kunit suite is a top level test from the KTAP point of view but
>> all suite diagnostic messages are printed at the subtest level:
>>
>> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output
On 9/28/23 11:20 AM, Geliang Tang wrote:
Extract duplicate code from these four functions
unix_redir_to_connected()
udp_redir_to_connected()
inet_unix_redir_to_connected()
unix_inet_redir_to_connected()
to create a new helper pair_redir_to_connected(). Create the different
socketpair in
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Fix four issues with resctrl selftests.
>
> The signal handling fix became necessary after the mount/umount fixes
> and the uninitialized member bug was discovered during the review.
>
> The other two came up when I ran resctrl selftests across the serv
Some tests like dma, ia64, etc. were not present in top level of
selftest Makefile, so when someone ran 'make run_tests' they would miss
these tests. This patches adds those left out tests.
Signed-off-by: Abhinav
---
I removed sched, safesetid and filelock from the Makefile, because these
tests
Hello Waiman,
I could test the patch using the for-next branch in your tree.
Just a NIT, it seemed that the message indicating the reason
the isolated configuration was invalid is not printed anymore:
Commands:
# mkdir cgroup
# mount -t cgroup2 none cgroup/
# mkdir cgroup/A1 cgroup/B1
# echo "+c
The initial value of 5% chosen for the maximum allowed percentage
difference between resctrl mbm value and IMC mbm value in commit
06bd03a57f8c ("selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting
format") was "randomly chosen value" (as admitted by the changelog).
When running tests in our lab acro
The MBA and CMT tests expect support of other features to be able to
run.
When platform only supports MBA but not MBM, MBA test will fail with:
Failed to open total bw file: No such file or directory
When platform only supports CMT but not CAT, CMT test will fail with:
Failed to open bit mask fil
Feature check in validate_resctrl_feature_request() takes in the test
name string and maps that to what to check per test.
Pass resource and feature names to validate_resctrl_feature_request()
directly rather than deriving them from the test name inside the
function which makes the feature check e
_GNU_SOURCE is defined in resctrl.h. Defining _GNU_SOURCE has a large
impact on what gets defined when including headers either before or
after it. This can result in compile failures if .c file decides to
include a standard header file before resctrl.h.
It is safer to define _GNU_SOURCE in Makefi
The test runner run_cmt_test() in resctrl_tests.c checks for CMT
feature and does not run cmt_resctrl_val() if CMT is not supported.
Then cmt_resctrl_val() also check is CMT is supported.
Remove the duplicated feature check for CMT from cmt_resctrl_val().
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen
Tested-by:
Unmounting resctrl FS has been moved into the per test functions in
resctrl_tests.c by commit caddc0fbe495 ("selftests/resctrl: Move
resctrl FS mount/umount to higher level"). In case a signal (SIGINT,
SIGTERM, or SIGHUP) is received, the running selftest is aborted by
ctrlc_handler() which then un
signal_handler_unregister() calls sigaction() with uninitializing
sa_flags in the struct sigaction.
Make sure sa_flags is always initialized in signal_handler_unregister()
by initializing the struct sigaction when declaring it. Also add the
initialization to signal_handler_register() even if there
Fix four issues with resctrl selftests.
The signal handling fix became necessary after the mount/umount fixes
and the uninitialized member bug was discovered during the review.
The other two came up when I ran resctrl selftests across the server
fleet in our lab to validate the upcoming CAT test
On Fri, 29 Sep 2023, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Ilpo,
>
> On 9/29/2023 4:20 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > signal_handler_unregister() calls sigaction() with uninitializing
> > sa_flags in the struct sigaction.
> >
> > Make sure sa_flags is always initialized in signal_handler_unregister()
> > by
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 12:57:35PM +0530, Abhinav wrote:
> Some tests like dma, ia64, etc. were not present in top level of
> selftest Makefile, so when someone ran 'make run_tests' they would miss
> these tests. This patches adds those left out tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav
> ---
> tools/te
On 28.09.23 20:34, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:51:18PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 28.09.23 19:21, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:05:40PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
As described as reply to v1, without fork() and KSM, the PAE bit should
stick around. If t
On 28.09.23 21:00, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:15:13PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
There are some interesting questions to ask here:
1) What happens if the old VMA has VM_SOFTDIRTY set but the new one not? You
most probably have to mark the PTE softdirty and not make it writa
Some tests like dma, ia64, etc. were not present in top level of
selftest Makefile, so when someone ran 'make run_tests' they would miss
these tests. This patches adds those left out tests.
Signed-off-by: Abhinav
---
tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
50 matches
Mail list logo
