Re: [CFT][PATCH] Re: Fwd: Re: memory usage - dentry_cache

2001-04-12 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
be equal to dentry_unused.prev (this is a circular list). -- Yoann Vandoorselaere | "Programming is a race between programmers, who try and MandrakeSoft | make more and more idiot-proof software, and universe, | which produces more and more remarkable idiots. Until

Re: Reason (was: Re: dropcopyright script)

2001-02-14 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
Mordechai Ovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In newer file managers, the icon of a C file is a tiny image of the first > few lines of text. If all files startt with a copyright, it's not much > good. So running this on a local, personal, tree can be a good thing. Modifying the file manager to

Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes [solved]

2000-11-29 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
Kiril Vidimce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > I've never seen such thing as code without bugs. In my experience, > > > the NVIDIA drivers are by far the most complete and solid 3D drivers > > > under Linux. > > > > You are welcome to your opinion. I've g

[patch-2.4.0-test12-pre3] ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.c compilation fix.

2000-12-02 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
--- linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.c.orig Sat Dec 2 16:18:05 2000 +++ linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.c Sat Dec 2 16:19:04 2000 @@ -228,6 +228,6 @@ } struct ip_conntrack_protocol ip_conntrack_protocol_tcp -= { { NULL, NULLpkt_IPPROTO_TCP, "tcp", -

Re: [patch-2.4.0-test12-pre3] ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.c compilation fix.

2000-12-03 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.c.origSat Dec 2 16:18:05 >2000 > +++ linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_tcp.c Sat Dec 2 16:19:04 2000 > @@ -228,6 +228,6 @@ > } > > s

Re: Possible critical VIA vt82c686a chip bug

2000-10-26 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > I've found a bug in my VIA SuperSouth (vt82c686a) chip (ISA bridge > revision 0x12, silicon rev CD) on my FIC VA-503A rev 1.2: > > When there is heavy disk activity (several tars running concurrently on > UDMA66 drive, or tar'ing from one UDM

Re: Possible critical VIA vt82c686a chip bug

2000-10-26 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 03:58:21PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > > > > I've found a bug in my VIA SuperSouth (vt82c686a) chip (ISA bridge > > > revision 0x12, silicon rev CD) on my FIC VA-503A rev 1.2: &g

Re: Possible critical VIA vt82c686a chip bug (private question)

2000-10-26 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:42:31PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:20:43PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > >

Re: Possible critical VIA vt82c686a chip bug (private question)

2000-10-26 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 01:42:29PM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > > > > ../drivers/block/ide.c, line 162, on version 2.2.17 does bad things > > > > to the timer. It writes 0 to the control-word for timer 0. This > > > > does the following: > > [

Re: Possible critical VIA vt82c686a chip bug (private question)

2000-10-26 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:11:54PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > > > > > > > ../drivers/block/ide.c, line 162, on version 2.2.17 does bad things > > > > > > to the timer. It writes 0 to the con

Re: Possible critical VIA vt82c686a chip bug (private question)

2000-10-26 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:05:04PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > > > yop, I 've done : > > > > make -j10 World > > in the xfree tree and simulateously : > > > > while true; do make dep

Re: Possible critical VIA vt82c686a chip bug (private question)

2000-10-27 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 12:02:20PM +0200, Martin Mares wrote: > > > > So this is not our problem here. Anyway I guess it's time to hunt for > > > i8259 accesses in the kernel that lack the necessary spinlock, even when > > > they're not probably the c

Re: Possible critical VIA vt82c686a chip bug (private question)

2000-10-27 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 12:58:12PM +0200, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote: > > > > > > So this is not our problem here. Anyway I guess it's time to hunt for > > > > > i8259 accesses in the ker

Re: VIA silent disk corruption - likely fix

2001-02-05 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
Peter Horton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've found the cause of silent disk corruption on my A7V motherboard, > and it might affect all boards with the same North bridge (KT133 etc). > > For some reason the IDE controller(s) was sometimes picking up stale > data during bus master DMA to the d

Re: [patch] 4GB I/O, cut three

2001-05-30 Thread Yoann Vandoorselaere
back into the normal zone that happens to be > > above the low mark is the wrong thing to do. > > 2.3.51 did this, we all know the result. Just a note, I remember the 2.3.51 kernel as the most usable kernel I ever used talking about VM. -- Yoann Vandoorselaere | C makes it eas