Marcin Kowalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> Regarding the patch ....
>
> I don't have experience with the linux kernel internals but could this patch
> not lead to a run-loop condition as the only thing that can break our of the
> for(;;) loop is the tmp==&dentry_unused statement. So if the required number
> of dentries does not exist and this condition is not satisfied we would have
> an infinate loop... sorry if this is a silly question.
AFAICT no because of the list_del_init(tmp) call :
When the list will be empty,
tmp will be equal to dentry_unused.prev (this is a circular list).
--
Yoann Vandoorselaere | "Programming is a race between programmers, who try and
MandrakeSoft | make more and more idiot-proof software, and universe,
| which produces more and more remarkable idiots. Until
| now, universe leads the race" -- R. Cook
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
