ier calls wdog_panic_handler().
ipmi_msghandler : notifier calls panic_event().
--
Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.k
This patch adds new notifier function tunable_notifier_chain. Its base is
atomic_notifier_chain.
Thanks,
---
Signed-off-by: Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -uprN linux-2.6.23-rc9.orig/include/linux/notifier.h
linux-2.6.23-rc9/include/linux/notifier.h
--- linux-2.6.23-rc
This patch implements new notifier function to panic_notifier_list. We can
change the list of order by debugfs.
Thanks,
---
Signed-off-by: Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -uprN linux-2.6.23-rc9.orig/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c
linux-2.6.23-rc9/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c
---
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:38:50 +0900 Takenori Nagano wrote:
>
>> This patch implements new notifier function to panic_notifier_list. We can
>> change the list of order by debugfs.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> ---
>>
>
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:38:34 +0900 Takenori Nagano wrote:
>> diff -uprN linux-2.6.23-rc9.orig/kernel/sys.c linux-2.6.23-rc9/kernel/sys.c
>> --- linux-2.6.23-rc9.orig/kernel/sys.c 2007-10-02 12:24:52.0
>> +0900
>> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc9
Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 08:38:05PM +0900, Takenori Nagano wrote:
>
> In summary, right now co-existence of kdb with kdump seems to be your pain
> point. I would prefer that kdb just puts a break point on panic() and we move
> on. If there are more candidates do
Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 08:38:34PM +0900, Takenori Nagano wrote:
>> This patch adds new notifier function tunable_notifier_chain. Its base is
>> atomic_notifier_chain.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Takenori
Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 08:38:50PM +0900, Takenori Nagano wrote:
>
>> @@ -522,8 +530,8 @@ setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>> }
>>
>> /* Register a call for panic conditions. */
>> -atomic_notifier
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> These patches add new notifier function and implement it to
>> panic_notifier_list.
>> We used the hardcoded notifier chain so far, but it was not flexible. New
>
Hi Vivek,
Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:47:18PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
>> * Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-26 17:44]:
Of course, but that's why the patch doesn't change this by default but
gives the user the choice.
>>> What value will distro set it
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Bernhard's idea (kdump uses panic_notifier) is very good for me. But it
>>> isn't
>>> good for kdump user, because they want to take a dump ASAP when panicked.
>>>
>> This one is better than registering kdump as one of the u
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> IMHO, most users don't use kdump, kdump users are only kernel developers and
>> enterprise users.
>
> Not at all. So far the only kdump related bug report I have
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Then I gave up to merge my patch to kdb, and I tried to send another patch to
>> kexec community. I can understand his opinion, but it is very difficult to
>> modify that kdump is called from panic
Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:05:47PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
>
>
> To sum up, couple of options come to mind.
>
> - Register all the RAS tools on die notifier and panic
> notifier lists with fairly high priority. Export list
> of RAS tools to user space and allow users t
Bernhard Walle wrote:
> * Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-14 10:34]:
>> Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:05:47PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> To sum up, couple of options come to mind.
>>>
Vivek Goyal wrote:
> So for the time being I think we can put RAS tools on die notifier list
> and if it runs into issues we can always think of creating a separate list.
>
> Few things come to mind.
>
> - Why there is a separate panic_notifier_list? Can't it be merged with
> die_chain? die_va
Nick Piggin wrote:
>>> Is it possible to use a single bit of common code and a single
>>> notifier for these things? Or is it too difficult?
>> >
>> > I'm sorry, I can't understand your image well. I'd like to know details of
>> > your image.
>
> Rather than have each of "RAS tools" have their own
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:53:03 +0900 Takenori Nagano wrote:
>
>> This patch implements new notifier function to panic_notifier_list. We can
>> change the list of order by debugfs.
>
> Should be sysfs IMO. debugfs isn't (should not be) req
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:53:00 +0900 Takenori Nagano wrote:
>
>> This patch adds new notifier function tunable_notifier_chain. Its base is
>> atomic_notifier_chain.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Takenori Na
This patch adds new notifier function tunable_notifier_chain. Its base is
atomic_notifier_chain.
Thanks,
---
Signed-off-by: Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -uprN linux-2.6.23.orig/include/linux/notifier.h
linux-2.6.23/include/linux/notifier.h
--- linux-2.6.23.orig/include
r().
ipmi_msghandler : notifier calls panic_event().
--
Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This patch implements new notifier function to panic_notifier_list. We can
change the list of order by debugfs.
Thanks,
---
Signed-off-by: Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -uprN linux-2.6.23.orig/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c
linux-2.6.23/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c
--- linux-2.6.2
This patch adds new notifier function tunable_notifier_chain. Its base is
atomic_notifier_chain.
Thanks,
---
Signed-off-by: Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -uprN linux-2.6.23.orig/include/linux/notifier.h
linux-2.6.23/include/linux/notifier.h
--- linux-2.6.23.orig/include
Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:06:51AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:45:08 +0900 Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I can sort-of see what this is doing. Runtime-definable management of
>> which notifier functions wil
This patch implements new notifier function to panic_notifier_list. We can
change the list of order by debugfs.
Thanks,
---
Signed-off-by: Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -uprN linux-2.6.23.orig/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c
linux-2.6.23/arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c
--- linux-
_list
at the same time.
kdump_after_notifier = 0
-> panic()
-> crash_kexec(NULL)
kdump_after_notifier = 1
-> panic()
-> atomic_notifier_call_chain(&panic_notifier_list, 0, buf);
-> crash_kexec(NULL)
Signed-off-by: Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-
Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 06:26:35PM +0900, Takenori Nagano wrote:
>> Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> > So for the time being I think we can put RAS tools on die notifier list
>>> and if it runs into issues we can always think of creating a separate list.
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
