Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:53:00 +0900 Takenori Nagano wrote:
> 
>> This patch adds new notifier function tunable_notifier_chain. Its base is
>> atomic_notifier_chain.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> ---
>> diff -uprN linux-2.6.23.orig/kernel/sys.c linux-2.6.23/kernel/sys.c
>> --- linux-2.6.23.orig/kernel/sys.c   2007-10-10 05:31:38.000000000 +0900
>> +++ linux-2.6.23/kernel/sys.c        2007-10-18 10:08:52.728000000 +0900
>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>>  #include <linux/kprobes.h>
>>  #include <linux/user_namespace.h>
>> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
>>  
>>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>  #include <asm/io.h>
>> @@ -393,6 +394,243 @@ int blocking_notifier_call_chain(struct 
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blocking_notifier_call_chain);
> 
>> +/**
>> + *  tunable_atomic_notifier_chain_register
>> + *                          - Add notifier to an tunable notifier chain
> 
> Function name & short description must be on one (long?) line.  :(

OK. I'll fix next version.

>> +
>> +int __kprobes __tunable_atomic_notifier_call_chain(
>> +                                    struct tunable_atomic_notifier_head *nh,
>> +                                    unsigned long val, void *v,
>> +                                    int nr_to_call, int *nr_calls)
>> +{
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    rcu_read_lock();
>> +    ret = notifier_call_chain(&nh->head, val, v, nr_to_call, nr_calls);
>> +    rcu_read_unlock();
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__tunable_atomic_notifier_call_chain);
> 
> Blank line is usually omitted before EXPORT_SYMBOL....

OK. I'll fix, too.

Thanks,
  Takenori

> ---
> ~Randy
> 
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to