Re: Tabs, spaces, indent and 80 character lines

Why do people even respond to these trolls...? -Miles -- Success, n. The one unpardonable sin against one's fellows. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-

Re: Kernel SCM saga..

Marcin Dalecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Better don't waste your time with looking at Arch. Stick with patches > you maintain by hand combined with some scripts containing a list of > apply commands and you should be still more productive then when using > Arch. Arch has its problems, but plea

Re: Why not GNU Arch instead of BitKeeper?

Asfand Yar Qazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm surprised nobody considered GNU Arch > (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/) to replace BitKeeper - it was > probably started in direct response to the Linux Kernel using a > non-free tool. > > I must say I haven't used it, but from reviews and

[PATCH] v850: Update checksum.h to match changed function signatures

Signed-off-by: Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> arch/v850/lib/checksum.c|3 ++- include/asm-v850/checksum.h | 11 ++- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff -ruN -X../cludes linux-2.6.11-uc0/arch/v850/lib/checksum.c linux-2.6.11-uc0-v850-20050711/arch/v8

[PATCH] v850: Update mmu.h header to match implementation changes

Signed-off-by: Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> include/asm-v850/mmu.h | 17 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff -ruN -X../cludes linux-2.6.11-uc0/include/asm-v850/mmu.h linux-2.6.11-uc0-v850-20050711/include/asm-v850/mmu.h --- linux-2.6.11-uc0/inclu

Re: [PATCH] v850: Update checksum.h to match changed function signatures

2005/7/11, Frederik Deweerdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > -unsigned int csum_partial_copy_from_user (const unsigned char *src, > > unsigned char *dst, > > +unsigned int csum_partial_copy_from_user (const unsigned char *src, > > + unsigned char *dst, >

[PATCH] v850: Align ___start___param to match parameter alignment

Signed-off-by: Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> arch/v850/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -ruN -X../cludes linux-2.6.11-uc0/arch/v850/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S linux-2.6.11-uc0-v850-20050713/arch/v850/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S --- linux-2.6.

[PATCH] v850: const-qualify first parameter of find_next_zero_bit

Signed-off-by: Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> include/asm-v850/bitops.h |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff -ruN -X../cludes linux-2.6.12-uc0/include/asm-v850/bitops.h linux-2.6.12-uc0-v850-20050720/include/asm-v850/bitops.h --- linux-2.6.12-uc0/inclu

[PATCH] v850: Define pfn_valid

Signed-off-by: Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> include/asm-v850/page.h |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -ruN -X../cludes linux-2.6.12-uc0/include/asm-v850/page.h linux-2.6.12-uc0-v850-20050720/include/asm-v850/page.h --- linux-2.6.12-uc0/include/as

Re: defconfig for v850, please

2005/7/20, Jan Dittmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > while you're at it patching v850 here and there, could you please > also provide a resonable defconfig for v850, so that I must admit it's because I've never quite understood how the defconfig stuff works... I'll look into it I guess... -miles -- Do

Re: defconfig for v850, please

2005/7/20, Jan Dittmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I must admit it's because I've never quite understood how the > > defconfig stuff works... I'll look into it I guess... > > I think you just need to provide a file called 'defconfig' in > arch/v850/ Hmmm... Some archs seem to provide defconfigs for

[PATCH] v850: Add defconfigs

Signed-off-by: Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> arch/v850/Makefile |7 arch/v850/README | 62 ++- arch/v850/configs/rte-ma1-cb_defconfig | 605 + arch/v850/configs/rte-me2-cb_defconfig

[PATCH] v850: Add pte_file

Signed-off-by: Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> include/asm-v850/pgtable.h |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff -ruN -X../cludes linux-2.6.12-uc0/include/asm-v850/pgtable.h linux-2.6.12-uc0-v850-20050721/include/asm-v850/pgtable.h --- linux-2.6.12-uc0/include/asm-v850/pgtable.

[PATCH] v850: Define L1_CACHE_SHIFT and L1_CACHE_SHIFT_MAX

Signed-off-by: Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> include/asm-v850/cache.h|7 +-- include/asm-v850/v850e2_cache.h |5 +++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff -ruN -X../cludes linux-2.6.12-uc0/include/asm-v850/cache.h linux-2.6.12-uc0-v850-20050721/i

[PATCH] v850: Update ioremap return type and add ioread/iowrite functions

Signed-off-by: Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> include/asm-v850/io.h | 37 - 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff -ruN -X../cludes linux-2.6.12-uc0/include/asm-v850/io.h linux-2.6.12-uc0-v850-20050721/include/asm-v850/io.h ---

[PATCH] v850: Update PCI support

These changes are untested (I no longer have the hardware). Signed-off-by: Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> arch/v850/kernel/rte_mb_a_pci.c | 37 +++-- arch/v850/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 14 ++ include/asm-v850/pci.h

Re: kernel guide to space

"linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It will take probably an hour to parse: > struct BusLogic_FetchHostAdapterLocalRAMReguest > FetchHostAdapterLocalRAMRequest > ^!) Agh! My eyes! The above names are way overdone by any measure, but is there any consensus whe

Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc3] i386: clean up user_mode macros

Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ask a hundred random C programmers what "!!x" means, versus what "x != 0" > means, and time their replies. I've always thought of "!!" as the "canonicalize boolean" operator... Vaguely ugly, but I think it's actually _more clear_ than != 0 in contexts

Re: v850, which gcc and binutils version?

Jan Dittmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Which is the recommended gcc/binutils combination for v850? The most crucial thing is that all supported processors are v850e derivatives (note the "e"), so please configure gcc/binutils for target "v850e-elf". [I usually use something bizarre and ancient

Re: v850, which gcc and binutils version?

Jan Dittmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "v850e-elf". > > Thanks, that got me much further, compilation aborts now with Hmmm, what sources are you compiling exactly? I last tested with 2.6.12 + 2.6.12-uc0 (uClinux) patches + the v850 patches I sent to the LKML recently (from which I presume you

Re: kernel guide to space (updated)

Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>3i. if/else/do/while/for/switch >> space between if/else/do/while and following/preceeding >> statements/expressions, if any > > Why this? if(a) {} is not any worse than if (a). Well it's harder to read (because it makes control constructs loo

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ugh. It's not like we want people saying "Hi there" in our changelogs. Well the _occasional_ friendly greeting might be kinda nice... -miles hi mom! -- Ich bin ein Virus. Mach' mit und kopiere mich in Deine .signature. fnord. - To unsubscribe from th

Re: [2.6 patch] remove support for gcc < 3.2

Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This patch removes support for gcc < 3.2 . Go away. -miles -- "Suppose He doesn't give a shit? Suppose there is a God but He just doesn't give a shit?" [George Carlin] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the bod

[PATCH] v850: Add show_mem

Signed-off-by: Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> arch/v850/kernel/setup.c | 30 ++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) diff -ruN -X../cludes linux-2.6.13-uc0/arch/v850/kernel/setup.c linux-2.6.13-uc0-v850-20050902/arch/v850/kernel/setup.c --- linux-2.6.13-uc0/arc

[PATCH] v850: Update defconfigs

Signed-off-by: Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> arch/v850/configs/rte-ma1-cb_defconfig | 108 ++--- arch/v850/configs/rte-me2-cb_defconfig | 21 -- arch/v850/configs/sim_defconfig| 21 -- 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

[PATCH] v850: Round up length passed to slram driver to a multiple of SLRAM_BLK_SZ

Signed-off-by: Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> arch/v850/kernel/setup.c | 14 -- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -ruN -X../cludes linux-2.6.13-uc0/arch/v850/kernel/setup.c linux-2.6.13-uc0-v850-20050902/arch/v850/kernel/setup.c --- linux-2.6.13-uc0/arc

Re: [RFC] Linux Kernel Subversion Howto

Kevin Puetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If you use svk for the client side, there's >> (almost?) no overhead. >> >> Regards, Olaf. > > erm, svk is cool and all, but it keeps a local repository mirror (not > necessarily full I suppose, but usually it is). So it's *much*

Re: [RFC] Linux Kernel Subversion Howto

Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Roman, Larry has a perfectly valid reason to call you a jerk, because > you are being one, and have been one for at least 50% of your posts > on this list over the last 2 years or more. Right this instant my > most fervent wish is for you to go get a j

Re: [darcs-users] Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

Dustin Sallings writes: > but the nicest thing about arch is that a given commit is immutable. > There are no tools to modify it. This is also why the crypto > signature stuff was so easy to fit in. > > RCS and SCCS storage throws away most of those features. Yeah, the basic way arch organizes i

Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

"Theodore Ts'o" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The "cost" of using BK seems to be primarily more theoretical, and > ideological, than real. I've never used BK (not allowed to), but some things I've read about it sound quite annoying. For instance: * Every source tree contains your entire reposit

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] MAINTAINERS remove the v850 entry

Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One bouncing email address and two non-existing URLs - we need either > updated information or this patch applied... I don't know the status of that email address/website (the NEC network has moved around a lot recently), but I'm reachable the address you

Re: [PATCH 13/20] inflate: (arch) kill silly zlib typedefs

Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know if x86_64 is LP64 or LLP64 on Linux, but at least my alpha > and sparc64 are LP64, so is another PPC64 I use for code validation. > LPC64 is the recommended model for easier 32 to 64 portability (where > ints are 32 ; long, longlong, ptrs are

Re: [2.6 patch] re-add required code to include/asm-v850/unistd.h

Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Wouldn't it be more appropriate to just open-code the contents of these >> macros in the place where they are used? >> >> Even better probably would be to convert the v850 kernel_thread code >> to call do_fork directly, like most other architectures do. >

Re: [PATCH] binfmt_flat: minimum support for theBlackfin relocations

Robin Getz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW - does anyone know Miles Bader's current email address? There isn't one > listed in MAINTAINERS - and he is still listed for the NEC V850? [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Miles -- Everywhere is walking distance if you have the time. -- Steven Wright - To unsubs