version 2
Capabilities: [f0] AGP version 2.0
Mikhail Kshevetskiy
PS: please CC me, as I am not in list
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
d be allowed to force enable C1e for both cores.
and if the user don't use this flag, the C1e state should be untouched.
Mikhail Kshevetskiy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
after upgrade from 2.6.10 to 2.6.11-rc1 my computer hang during boot.
Before the death it write:
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKA] BIOS reported IRQ 0, using IRQ 11
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKA] enabled at IRQ 11
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:0f.1[A] -> GSI 11 (level,low) -> IRQ 11
.
PS: i386 kernel with similar configuration works with HPET without any
trouble.
Sincerely yours,
Mikhail Kshevetskiy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
2007/10/19, Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/01/2007 02:15 AM, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have ASUS F3T notebook with dualcore AMD processor. It has c1e feature
> > enabled. I test linux-2.6.23-rc8-hrt1 kernel. Everything is work (
2007/10/25, Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/24/2007 05:26 PM, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I fill something wrong here.
> >>> Is it possible to reduce the amount of timer interrupts?
> >>> Is it possible to force enable
01 Oct 2007 11:33:48 +0200, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mikhail Kshevetskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > The same situation can be observed for linux-2.6.22.
>
> You're saying 2.6.22/x86-64 without any patches doesn't boot out of the box
&g
2007/10/1, Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
> > No, it boot and work normally. The only thing i bother, is the
> > additional 260 timer interrupts per seconds.
> > Here is short result:
> >
> > c1e enabl
2007/10/1, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > No, it boot and work normally. The only thing i bother, is the additional
>
> Ok you want an additional feature; not a bug fixed.
>
> Please make that always clear.
>
> > 260 timer interrupts per seconds.
> > Here is short result:
> >
> > c1e enabled:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:54:41 +0200
Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 08:51 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 10:44 +0400, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
> > > There are at list two serious delays:
> > >
> &
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:31:10 +0200
Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 12:35 +0400, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
> > > > > at 73.442744: I do nothing, the kernel continue to boot after 168
> > > > > sec
> > > >
11 matches
Mail list logo