EXPORT_SYMBOL for chrdev_open 2.4.3

2001-04-13 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
It would be nice if chrdev_open were added to ksyms.c along with blkdev_open since tape devices seem are always registered as character rather than block devices. I am finding that kernel modules that need to open and close a tape drive have to export chrdev_open manually on 2.4.3. Can this

Re: EXPORT_SYMBOL for chrdev_open 2.4.3

2001-04-13 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:13:41PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: > > > On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > It would be nice if chrdev_open were added to ksyms.c along with > > blkdev_open since tape devices seem are always registered as character >

Re: EXPORT_SYMBOL for chrdev_open 2.4.3

2001-04-13 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 06:38:10PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:13:41PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > > > It would be nice if chrdev_open were added to ksyms.c alo

Re: EXPORT_SYMBOL for chrdev_open 2.4.3

2001-04-13 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 09:25:10PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: > > > On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > Not meaning to offend, but how could you know what everyone > > who uses Linux needs in every instance? NT, NetWare, etc. all > > expose thes

Re: EXPORT_SYMBOL for chrdev_open 2.4.3

2001-04-13 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 09:29:43PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > How are folks supposed to open disk and tape devices from kernel modules > > without these? Not everything should be done in user space Al. If you >

BUG() at line 804, slab.c, 2.4.3

2001-04-17 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
I noticed that subsequent calls to kmem_cache_create with the same name does not return an -EEXIST return code, but instead barfs and crashes with a bug at slab.c line 804. This occurs in 2.4.3. Is this the expected behavior for kmem_cache_create? I am using the slab allocator to create and

Re: BUG() at line 804, slab.c, 2.4.3

2001-04-17 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:29:20PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: Added kmem_cache_destroy() to get around the problem. I'm still curious as to why we need to panic at this point rather than return an error. Thanks Jeff > > > I noticed that subsequent calls to kmem_cache_c

filp_open() in 2.2.19 causes memory corruption

2001-04-23 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
I am now using the filp_open() call in kernel to scan for tape devices in lieu of chrdev_open()/blkdev_open(), but I have discovered that calling this api with non-existent devices appears to result in memory corruption and some nasty oops. I have attached the code fragment and oops generate

3-Ware Raid driver fails to update GenDisk head

2001-04-23 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Andre/LKML, I am still working on this, but would appreciate some help from whomever owns this driver proper. I have discovered that the 3Ware drivers are not updating the gendisk_head with devices reported and exposed to user space as /dev/sda, sdb, etc. The adapter driver does correctly r

Re: 3-Ware Raid driver fails to update GenDisk head

2001-04-23 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 09:47:01PM +0200, Guest section DW wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:08:52PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > > I am still working on this, but would appreciate some help from > > whomever owns this driver proper. I have discovered that the >

Re: filp_open() in 2.2.19 causes memory corruption

2001-04-23 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:24:55PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: > Are you sure the trace is decoded correctly? > > > CPU:0 > > EIP:0010:[sys_mremap+31/884] > > EFLAGS: 00010206 > > > Code: ac ae 75 08 84 c0 75 f8 31 c0 eb 04 19 c0 0c 01 85 c0 75 d9 > ac ae is > lodsb > scasb > > Could

Re: 3-Ware Raid driver fails to update GenDisk head

2001-04-23 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 11:13:12PM +0200, Guest section DW wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 01:55:00PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 09:47:01PM +0200, Guest section DW wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:08:52PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: >

Re: filp_open() in 2.2.19 causes memory corruption

2001-04-23 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 11:03:48PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Are you sure the trace is decoded correctly? > > > > CPU:0 > > > EIP:0010:[sys_mremap+31/884] > > Probably not. It looks like it was munged by klogd. Some distributions are > still shipp

NWFS broken on 2.4.3 -- someone removed WRITERAW

2001-04-23 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Hey guys, Whomever removed WRITERAW has broken NWFS. WRITE requests call _refile_buffer() after the I/O request and take my locally created buffer heads and munge them back into the linux buffer cache, causing massive memory corruption in the system. These buffers don't belong in Linus' buf

Re: 3-Ware Raid driver fails to update GenDisk head

2001-04-23 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:45:35AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 11:13:12PM +0200, Guest section DW wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 01:55:00PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > > On Mon, Ap

Re: NWFS broken on 2.4.3 -- someone removed WRITERAW

2001-04-23 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:58:09AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > > > > Hey guys, > > > > Whomever removed WRITERAW has broken NWFS. WRITE requests call > > _refile_buffer() after the I/O request and take m

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-25 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Please also check vger.timpanogas.org/nwfs/nwfs.tar.gz:disk.c for NetWare specific calculations of the CHS values, a different method is used for NetWare partitions vs. everything else (Novell just had to be different). If you do not use their methods on NetWare partitions, NetWare will not reco

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-25 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
- Original Message - From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Guest section DW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Andreas Jellinghaus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 5:02 PM Subject: Re:

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 04:11:56AM +0100, Guest section DW wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 05:02:09PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > Please also check vger.timpanogas.org/nwfs/nwfs.tar.gz:disk.c for NetWare > > specific calculations of the CHS values, a different

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
table has been corrupted. Jeff > > On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > > > Please also check vger.timpanogas.org/nwfs/nwfs.tar.gz:disk.c for NetWare > > specific calculations of the CHS values, a different method is used for > > NetWare parti

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
- Original Message - From: "Andre Hedrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Guest section DW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Andreas Jellinghaus" <

Re: partition table: chs question

2001-02-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
- Original Message - From: "Guest section DW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Andreas Jellinghaus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; &

[ANNOUNCE] PCI-SCI Drivers 1.2-2 reposted

2001-03-05 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
I have reposted the PCI-SCI files since some folks have reported corruption in one of the files on our server. These drivers support PCI-SCI hardware versions up to the PSB66. These drivers can be downloaded for 2.2 and 2.4 Linux at vger.timpanogas.org:/sci/pci-sci-1.2-2 via ftp or from

NetWare Changing IP Port 524

2000-11-14 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Petr/Linux, If you are relying on port 524 to get SAP information for NCPFS over TCPIP, you may want to track this since it appears Novell will be patching this port to close a security flaw. I added the tracking URL so you can review what changes they are proposing. I think what they are p

Re: NetWare Changing IP Port 524

2000-11-14 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > On 14 Nov 00 at 12:11, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > If you are relying on port 524 to get SAP information for NCPFS over > > TCPIP, you may want to track this since it appears Novell will be > > patching this port to close a security flaw

Re: NetWare Changing IP Port 524

2000-11-14 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 01:29:31PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > Hopefully, sanity will rule out here. I information being leaked from > > what I reviewed was the ability for a hacker to exploit port 524 and use > > it > > to obt

NCPFS not returning Volume Size (???)

2000-11-16 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Petr, NCPFS in 2.2.18-pre21 is not returning volume size via df -h. I checked your code and found this comment: static int ncp_statfs(struct super_block *sb, struct statfs *buf, int bufsiz) { struct statfs tmp; /* We cannot say how much disk space is left on a mounted

Re: test11-pre6

2000-11-16 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 06:33:11PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > The log-file says it all.. > > Linus > > - > > - pre6: > - Intel: start to add Pentium IV specific stuff (128-byte cacheline > etc) > - David Miller: search-and-destroy places that forget to ma

Re: NCPFS not returning Volume Size (???)

2000-11-16 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 08:40:29PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > Petr, > > NCPFS in 2.2.18-pre21 is not returning volume size via df -h. I checked > your code and found this comment: > > static int ncp_statfs(struct super_block *sb, struct statfs *buf, int bufsiz) > {

MANOS/Ring 0 Linux lists back up

2000-11-16 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Now that sendmail/load average problems have been nailed for 2.2.18> 2.4, the mailing lists are working. We apologize, but the server was upgraded and during the upgrade, most folks addresses got zapped in the var/lib/majordomo/lists directory, so folks who want to track Andre and our work on t

Re: test11-pre6

2000-11-16 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 12:30:46AM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote: > On Thu Nov 16, 2000 at 08:45:10PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > > > > - pre6: > > > - Intel: start to add Pentium IV specific stuff (128-byte cacheline > > > etc) > > &g

Re: ORACLE and 2.4-test10

2000-11-17 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Alan, When we ported Oracle to NetWare, we found that making changes to the core file systems in NetWare that Oracle needed would tank FS performance, so we came up with something called direct FS, a separate File System interface just for Oracle. The SOSD layer inside of Oracle allows them, vi

Re: ORACLE and 2.4-test10

2000-11-17 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Alan Cox wrote: > > > performance, so we came up with something called direct FS, a separate > > File System interface just for Oracle. The SOSD layer inside of Oracle > > Yeah but you see thats ugly > > > In NetWare, directFS was little more than a "raw" interface that > > bypassed the file

VFS Kernel Panic in 2.4.0-10(11)

2000-11-17 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
This is probably a configuration mismatch of some kind, but I just finished building my 2.4.0 RPM skeletons and am installting them from our latest CD burn, and I am seeing the following problem when I upgrade our 2.2.17 kernel versions with 2.4.0-test10, then reboot them under 2.4: req

Re: VFS Kernel Panic in 2.4.0-10(11)

2000-11-17 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
We dfound it. 2.2.X .configs are incompatible with 2.4.0 and the upgrade RPMs sucked them in. Since IDE is a unique CONFIG option, this will break. Jeff "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: > > > This is probably a configuration mismatch of some kind, but I just > finished

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre22

2000-11-18 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 01:11:33AM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > Bugs to go: PS/2 mouse detection > > Anything which isnt a strict bug fix or previously agreed is now 2.2.19 > material. > > Alan > > 2.2.18pre22 > o Fix HZ assumption in USB hub driver (Oleg Drokin) > o Fix ndis

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre22

2000-11-19 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 12:57:35PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > > o Small ISDN documentation fixes (Kai Germaschewski) > > > > Alan, On the ISDN issue, isdn4K-utils seems to be out of sync with=20 > > kernels older than 2.2.16. Some #define's that used to be in > > the 2.2.14 pat

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre22

2000-11-19 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 04:09:01PM +0100, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > > o Small ISDN documentation fixes (Kai Germaschewski) > > > > Alan, On the ISDN issue, isdn4K-utils seems to be out of sync with &g

Re: NCPFS not returning Volume Size (???)

2000-11-19 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 05:10:06PM +0100, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 08:40:29PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > Petr, > > > > NCPFS in 2.2.18-pre21 is not returning volume size via df -h. I checked > > your code and found this comment: > >

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre22

2000-11-20 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 11:10:21AM +0100, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > ISDN_MODEM_ANZREG undefined on 2.4.0-10(11) and 2.2.18-22, rpm.spec is > > attached. > > This has been fixed 2000/03/03, see below.

Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Linux

2000-11-20 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 08:53:19AM -0500, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote: Charles, 6.2 is one of te better distributions. You should also go talk to RedHat directly. Jeff > > I tried to help a friend this weekend convert to Linux. > He lives in Upstate New York, so it was a long trip from >

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre22 (ISDN4K errors)

2000-11-20 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
We were using the attached spec file for 3.1pre1 and the other file for 3.1beta7 (sorry I posted the wrong file, it was about 2 a.m. in the morning). When built against 2.2.18-21 with 3.1pre1, I get a whole new slew of errors. Neither seems to work. I have attached the 3.1pre1 spec file which

[Fwd: Linux 2.2.18pre22 (ISDN4K errors)]

2000-11-20 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
My NT box fritzed on sending this via outlook express, so I lost Kai's email (MUTT works better on Linux). Here's the other info he inquired about on the 3.1pre1 compile problems. Jeff We were using the attached spec file for 3.1pre1 and the other file for 3.1beta7 (sorry I posted the wrong

NFS 2.4.0-11 noisy messages/NFS rpc.lockd returns error

2000-11-20 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
doing a mount :/dir /mount_point generates the following noisy error messages: kmem_create: Forcing size word alignment - nfs-fh also, the rpc.lockd program is reporting an error when invoked from the System V init startup scripts: lockd: lockdsvc: invalid argument during system initializat

Re: NFS 2.4.0-11 noisy messages/NFS rpc.lockd returns error

2000-11-20 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Ion Badulescu wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 17:56:20 -0700, Jeff V. Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > also, the rpc.lockd program is reporting an error when invoked from the > > System V init startup scripts: > > > > lockd: lockdsvc: invalid

Oops in 2.2.18-22 with non-existent TCPIP route

2000-11-21 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Alan, I have an Oops with 2.2.18-22 that only shows up on a Linux server that's configured as a pppd dial in server with dynamic address assignment (no DHCP). Host IP addresses are configured in an options.ttyS0(192.168.0.1) and options.ttyS1(192.168.0.2) files in /etc/ppp. We caused the Oop

Re: e2fs performance as function of block size

2000-11-21 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Alan Cox wrote: > > > Sirs, > > performing extensive tests on linux platform performance, optimized as > > database server, I got IMHO confusing results: > > in particular e2fs initialized to use 1024 block/fragment size showed > > significant I/O gains over 4096 block/fragment size, while I ex

Re: e2fs performance as function of block size

2000-11-21 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Alan Cox wrote: > > > It's as though the disk drivers are optimized for this case (1024). I > > The disk drivers are not, and they normally see merged runs of blocks so they > will see big chunks rather than 1K then 1K then 1K etc. > > > behavior, but there is clearly some optimization relat

modutils 2.3.20 not backward compatible

2000-11-21 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Keith, Was there a reason we removed the -i and -m options from newer modutils and broke backwards caompatibility? I'm re-writing our module build scripts for the installer, and I discovered after upgrading to 2.3.20, that all the build scripts (about 10MB worth) are now busted and I have been

Re: modutils 2.3.20 not backward compatible

2000-11-21 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Keith Owens wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 20:17:47 -0700, > "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Was there a reason we removed the -i and -m options from newer modutils > >and broke backwards caompatibility? I'm re-writing our module

Re: [patch] O_SYNC patch 3/3, add inode dirty buffer list support to ext2

2000-11-22 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 11:26:46AM +, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > Hi, > > This final part of the O_SYNC patches adds calls to ext2, and to > generic_commit_write, to record dirty buffers against the owning > inode. It also removes most of fs/ext2/fsync.c, which now simply > calls the generic

Re: Announce: modutils 2.3.21 is available

2000-11-22 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 11:25:17PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > This is the "never release a security fix in a hurry" release. The > security fixes in modutils 2.3.20 had some side effects on some config > files. Linus knocked back environment variable MOD_SAFEMODE, instead > the kernel propagate

AGP patches for 2.2.X kernels

2000-11-22 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Alan, I noticed that the AGP patches are present in RH6.2 and 7.0, and that the agp support is integrated in 2.4.0. Do you know where the patches are for the 2.2.18 kernels for AGP. Thanks Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message

Re: Announce: modutils 2.3.21 is available

2000-11-22 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 10:19:17AM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > + add RedHat ism's with a --rhc (red hat compatible) -i -m (-F) > > > > RedHat kind of is the standard in the commercial world in the US.

iBCS2 and 2.4.0-11 Can we make soup yet?

2000-11-24 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
I noticed that iBC2 support no longer builds against 2.4.0-11. I also found that 11/98 seems to be the last version of iBCS2 posted. 2.4.0-11 does have a MISC binary loadable option, but I did not see iBCS2 in the tree. Is there something more recent, or is iBCS2 something that's basically no

Oops on 2.2.18-23 as pppd dial in server

2000-11-24 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Alan, Was able to reproduce this Oops, but it took several days. Oops occurs against 2.2.18-23. I had to copy this info from the console -- the system was hard hung after the oops and even ksymoops was locked solid. Jeff unable to handle kernel paing request virtual address 90C16C24 CR3-018

Re: Oops on 2.2.18-23 as pppd dial in server

2000-11-24 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
I always type too fast. Yes, it's "slocate". Jeff "Mohammad A. Haque" wrote: > > solcate? .. you sure you don't mean slocate? > > "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:

setting up pppd dial-in on linux

2000-11-24 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Anyone out there a whiz at setting up a pppd dialin server? I am trying to put together an RPM for pppd dialin configurations that will support default Windows NT and Linux dial in clients without requiring the poor user to learn bash scripting, chat scripting, mgetty and inittab configuratio

Re: setting up pppd dial-in on linux

2000-11-25 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 11:48:06PM -0800, J Sloan wrote: > "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: > > > Anyone out there a whiz at setting up a pppd dialin server? I am > > trying to put together an RPM for pppd dialin configurations > > that will support default Wi

Re: setting up pppd dial-in on linux

2000-11-25 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Jeff > > > Regards, > Pedro > > On 25 Nov 2000, at 0:36, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > > > > > Anyone out there a whiz at setting up a pppd dialin server? I am > > trying to put together an RPM for pppd dialin configurations > > that will s

Re: setting up pppd dial-in on linux

2000-11-25 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Se has a pretty nice setup, but we have as many, if not more problems with their's vs. RedHat and ours. Jeff > > Scott > > - Original Message - > From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, Nov

Re: Oops on 2.2.18-23 as pppd dial in server

2000-11-25 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 06:22:57PM +0100, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Was able to reproduce this Oops, but it took several days. Oops occurs > > against 2.2.18-23. I had to copy this info from the console --

Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy

2000-11-25 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 03:26:15PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: Rik, We refuse to use it here at present. Builds from it have a lot of problems, for some reason. Andre is looking into it more deeply than I, but I agree with your assessment. Jeff > On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Neil Brown wrote: > > O

PCMCIA 3.1.22 needs patch for kernels > 2.2.18-23

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
David Hinds/Linux, PCMCIA 3.1.22 requires that the defines in /include/pcmcia/k_compat.h for init_waitqueue_head(n) and set_current_state(n) be removed in order to build correctly against 2.2.18-23. Offending code attached. This probably needs somethig better than the LINUX_KERNEL_VERSION

[PATCH] modutils 2.3.20 and beyond

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Keith, Please consider the attached patch for inclusion in all future versions of the modutils depmod program for compatiblity with RedHat and RedHat derived Linux distributions. This patch only requires 4 very short changes to depmod.c as opposed to thousands of changes necessary in anacond

Re: [PATCH] modutils 2.3.20 and beyond

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 10:46:35PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > + {"ignore-versions", 0, 0, 'i'}, > > I dont think we should encourage anyone to ignore symbol versions Anaconda will barf and require over 850+ changes to the scripts without it. If you look at the patch, you will note tha

Re: initdata for modules?

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:54:57AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 07:30:44 -0800, > "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover > >that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module. > >I was wonderi

Re: [PATCH] modutils 2.3.20 and beyond

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
a trivial change, and would save me a lot of hours rewriting scripts. I did it once, but if RedHat has standardized on this set of switches, why not add them as alias commands? It's a trivial patch. Jeff > > "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: > > > > Anaconda will barf and

Re: [PATCH] modutils 2.3.20 and beyond

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 04:15:02PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 05:03:34PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > Great. Then tell RedHat to rewrite it without the need for these switches. > > They will say NO. It's a trivial change, and would

Re: [PATCH] modutils 2.3.20 and beyond

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:23:08AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 16:36:55 -0700, > "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Keith, > > > >Please consider the attached patch for inclusion in all future versions > >of the moduti

Re: initdata for modules?

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:45:34AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 17:01:35 -0700, > "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >insmod ppp_deflate (should trigger load of all these modules). I > >know it's works this way if there'

Re: [PATCH] modutils 2.3.20 and beyond

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 04:16:26PM -0800, David Ford wrote: > "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 06:02:35PM -0500, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > > > I'd rather have Anaconda changed rather than special casing standard > > > utils

Re: initdata for modules?

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 03:47:30PM -0800, Adam J. Richter wrote: > Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >"Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>In reading include/linux/init.h, I was surprised to discover > >>that __init{,data} expands to nothing when compiling a module. > >>I wa

Re: initdata for modules?

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 01:06:04PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 19:49:43 -0700, > "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Microsoft drivers have an .INIT code section that is initialization > >ccode that get's chunked after it&#

Re: [PATCH] modutils 2.3.20 and beyond

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 02:11:49AM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Anaconda will barf and require over 850+ changes to the scripts without > > > it. If you look at the patch, you will note that it's a silent switch > > > that's only there to avoid a noisy error message from depmod. It > > > actuall

syslinux and 2.4.0 initrd size problems

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
I am having trouble getting a 2.4 vmlinuz (bzImage) and initrd image onto a 1.44 floppy with all the new stuff. Even a stipped down kernel compiled under 2.4 is @ 600K compressed, and I need about 800K for the initrd image. I noticed that syslinux has some comments about not allowing initr

Re: syslinux and 2.4.0 initrd size problems

2000-11-26 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 08:22:54PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Why are you posting this to the kernel list? See the SYSLINUX > documentation for the SYSLINUX mailing list address. Never mind. I am rewriting the install init program instead and restructuring the driver organization to do wh

Re: syslinux and 2.4.0 initrd size problems

2000-11-27 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:29:08AM -0800, Michael Peddemors wrote: > Happily using initrd on a 1.44 floppy here, and there should be no reason why > you can't use it for a CDROM distro as well, you can have syslinux on the > CDROM too... I believe their is a a syslinux mailing list to check if y

2.2.18-23 w/Frame Buffer (LEVEL IV)

2000-11-27 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
A level IV issue in 2.2.18-23. With frame buffer enabled, upon boot, the OS is displaying four penguin images instead of one penguin in the upper left corner of the screen. Looks rather tacky. Also puts the VGA text mode default into mode 274. Is this what's supposed to happen? Jeff - To un

Re: 2.2.18-23 w/Frame Buffer (LEVEL IV)

2000-11-27 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Sven Koch wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > A level IV issue in 2.2.18-23. With frame buffer enabled, upon boot, > > the OS is displaying four penguin images instead of one penguin in the > > upper left corner of the screen. Looks rathe

Re: Broken NTFS

2000-11-29 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 06:33:36AM -0800, Joseph K. Malek wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a broken NTFS, due to my own mistake of mounting the > partition RW and moving a file instead of copying itI've been poking > around for an NTFS editing tool; only to find that this is easier said > than don

Re: Fasttrak100 questions...

2000-11-29 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 09:08:30PM +0100, Henning P . Schmiedehausen wrote: > No. > > If I modify the kernel or any other GPL software for my personal use > and give it to no one, I am _not at all_ forced to make it public. > > Only if I distribute a compiled kernel or any other program under GP

Re: Fasttrak100 questions...

2000-11-30 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:14:47AM -0500, Christopher Friesen wrote: > "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 09:08:30PM +0100, Henning P . Schmiedehausen wrote: > > > > I use heavily patched kernels with lots of inhouse-stuff on a regu

Re: Fasttrak100 questions...

2000-11-30 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:09:37PM -0500, Christopher Friesen wrote: > "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:14:47AM -0500, Christopher Friesen wrote: > > > > I think you should re-read the GPL. You only have to provide source to >

Re: Oops in 2.2.18 with pppd dial in server

2000-12-01 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 12:46:18PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > I was able to reproduce this oops with a somewhat more reliable ksymoops (I was >ready for this nasty bug this time). Looks like the problem is in the sockets > > code. > > The traces so far all match one description , this one inclu

Re: Fasttrak100 questions...

2000-12-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 06:46:59PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: >Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 17:18:43 + (GMT) >From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Well, it's not up to just me, given that Linus also has his copyright on > the code (although I doubt there's more than a few lines wh

Re: Fasttrak100 questions...

2000-12-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 06:21:26PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 06:46:59PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > >Date:Sat, 2 Dec 2000 17:18:43 + (GMT) > >From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Well, it's not u

Re: Fasttrak100 questions...

2000-12-02 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 10:42:29PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: >Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 18:21:26 -0700 >From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Under this argument, it is argued that the engineer who had source >code access "inev

Re: [patch] O_SYNC patch 3/3, add inode dirty buffer list support to ext2

2000-11-23 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:01:35PM +, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 11:54:24AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > > I have not implemented O_SYNC in NWFS, but it looks like I need to add it > > before posting the final patches.

Re: Phantom PS/2 mouse persists..

2000-12-03 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 06:27:52PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > Unfortunately, 2.2.18pre24 is still convinced that I have a PS/2 mouse > > attached to my machine. > > I've fixed the major case. I can see no definitive answer to the other ghost > PS/2 stuff (except maybe USB interactions). I take it

Re: Phantom PS/2 mouse persists..

2000-12-03 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 02:45:58PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 06:27:52PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Unfortunately, 2.2.18pre24 is still convinced that I have a PS/2 mouse > > > attached to my machine. > > > > I've fixed the majo

Re: Phantom PS/2 mouse persists..

2000-12-03 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 05:42:03PM -0500, Steven N. Hirsch wrote: > On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 06:27:52PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > > > > I've fixed the major case. I can see no definitive answer t

2.2.18-24 with IPVS patch has compile errors

2000-12-03 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
With the 2.2.17 IPVS patch applied to 2.2.18-24, I am seeing the following compile errors. -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/ute/BUILD/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -D__SMP__ -pipe -fno-strength-reduce -m386 -DCPU=386 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -inc

Re: Phantom PS/2 mouse persists..

2000-12-03 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 12:49:47AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 10:24:19AM -0500, Steven N. Hirsch wrote: > > Unfortunately, 2.2.18pre24 is still convinced that I have a PS/2 mouse > > attached to my machine. > > Nod. Which board? I'm seeing the problem with Asus CUWE. N

Re: [resync?] Re: corruption

2000-12-03 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 05:45:57PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Sorry, it's still failing. It took three hours. > > Yes. For one thing, original was plain wrong wrt locking (lru_list_lock > should be held). For another, it does not take car

Re: 2.2.18-24 with IPVS patch has compile errors

2000-12-03 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 05:52:26PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > With the 2.2.17 IPVS patch applied to 2.2.18-24, I am seeing the following > compile errors. > > -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/ute/BUILD/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 >-fomit-frame-pointer

2.4.0-11 AIC7xxx.o driver barfs on AHA27XX adapter

2000-12-03 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On a four processor POCA system with dual Fast-SCSI AHA274X/VLB bus controllers I am seeing the following timeout errors right after the sequencer scripts are downloaded and the driver starts polling. It does not happen when compiled in kernel, only when loaded from an initrd image. The root F

Re: 2.4.0-11 AIC7xxx.o driver barfs on AHA27XX adapter

2000-12-03 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 06:15:24PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > On a four processor POCA system with dual Fast-SCSI AHA274X/VLB bus > controllers I am seeing the following timeout errors right after > the sequencer scripts are downloaded and the driver starts polling. >

Re: Fasttrak100 questions...

2000-12-04 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 01:07:30AM -0600, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Jeff, > > Have you also seen this applied where it is to the employer's > disadvantage? For example, given that I looked at and worked > with GPL code (say Linux kernel) in University before taking > employment as a programm

NWFS mkfs.nwfs and fsck.nwfs tools issues -- need input

2000-12-05 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Alan, I guess since my brain is 40+ years old and dying, I will keep getting slower... and slower . integrating this into a release is about 4 times the work I had thought (GNU partspec -- what is mess!!!). 2.4 seems to have stopped changing and is very stable, and Linus appears to have st

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >