Hello,
I'll make this quick as I know how much traffic this list gets.
What version of the 2.4.x kernels is actually stable enough to use? I
ask this because I see 2.4.2, but then the 2.4.2ac7 fix which from what I
have read on here, is a pretty important patch. Is 2.4.2 or 2.4.1 stable
enou
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 19:03:31 +0300
>
> Todd wrote:
> > hans,
> > we've found that the TCP and UDP performance on 2.4 is *dramatically*
> > better than 2.2.
[..]
> > i'd recommend it's networking performance to anyone.
> >
> > On Thu, 1 Mar 2001
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > this isnt a kernel problem, its a _very_ stupid app
> > ---
> > Must be more than one stupid app...
>
> Could well be. You have something continually trying to open your cdrom and
> see if there is media in it
Gnome / KDE? does exactly that... (rath
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Scott M. Hoffman wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> >
> > I -- S T R O N G L Y -- suggest that nobody use this kernel with
> > a BusLogic SCSI controller until this problem is fixed.
> >
> > Dick Johnson
>
> It may not be related, but out of five boot
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Scott M. Hoffman wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, God wrote:
>
> > # iostat
> > Linux 2.4.2 (scotch)03/06/2001
>
> I have not had problems with 2.4.2, just tried 2.4.2-ac12. About the IDE
> stage it just reboots.
Same chipset/mb?
> As
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I have not had problems with 2.4.2, just tried 2.4.2-ac12. About the IDE
> > stage it just reboots.
>
> Does ac11 also reboot like that. -ac is currently testing versions of the new
> VIA IDE driver so knowing if the latest update did that would be very
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Ben Greear wrote:
> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 23:32:11 -0700
> From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Linux Kernel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was 2.4.2: W
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 01:21:31 -0500 (EST)
> From: Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Linux Kernel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: 2.4.2 ext2 filesystem corruption ? (was
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
> Gerhard Mack wrote:
> >
> > > Its what I would describe as lack of enforcement by trading standards bodies,
> > > and I suspect what the US would call 'insufficient class action lawsuits'
> >
> > What we need is a web page for listing crap hardware
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Gerhard Mack wrote:
> Subject: Re: VIA's Southbridge bug: Latest (pseudo-)patch
>
> > Its what I would describe as lack of enforcement by trading standards bodies,
> > and I suspect what the US would call 'insufficient class action lawsuits'
>
> What we need is a web page f
Hiya,
Just a few quickies
One, is kernelnotes.org down ? .. I can't get to it (times out), I've
tried from a few boxes on different networks just incase it was on my end
.. (since I've compiled ecn in, MANY things don't seem to be working
... even the best search engine in the world .. do
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Robert Cohen wrote:
> From: Robert Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I am thinking of buying a machine with a via chipset and I wan't to know
> how stable it is likely to be with Linux.
> I would appreciate it if someone who know's whats going on can give a
> report on the state
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 01:08:31PM -0400, God wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 May 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> >
> > > 2) They certainly are. Every once in a while they go through a period of
> > >silently dropping all e
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Pekka Savola wrote:
> To: Matthew Geier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Wed, 9 May 2001, Matthew Geier wrote:
> > > Help is needed to contact these site owners and politely using a standard
> > > email ask them that their site was non-conformant.
[snip]
> >
> >
> > I tried to
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> 2) They certainly are. Every once in a while they go through a period of
>silently dropping all email coming from hosts that don't have PTRs.
>This would be no worse.
ACK Which do you mean? :
-Hosts that don't have valid PTRs (which wou
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
[.]
> Packets are dropped when a device queue
> fills, and when one sender is much faster than the other the faster sender
> often wins the race, while the packets of the slower one get dropped.
[.]
Speaking of queues on routers/servers, does such
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> Subject: Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants
>
> > Would you mind demonstrating such wonder? Old devices are still there,
> > AFAICS. Ext2 (reiserfs, devfs, abortion-of-your-choice-fs) still has
> > the ability to create device nodes for them.
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Yet another 2.5 project. If Linus wants to go play with name driven devices
> and you want to help him great, but if he'd care to put out
> linux-2.5.0.tar.gz _before_ starting that would be good for all of us
ACK! .. 2.5?? .. gawd .. I just installed 2.
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:49:16PM -0400, God wrote:
>
> > Speaking of queues on routers/servers, does such a util exist that would
> > measure (even a rough estimate), what level of congestion (queueing) is
> > happening betw
20 matches
Mail list logo
