Re: [2.6.22.2 review 06/84] Add a PCI ID for santa rosas PATA controller.

2007-08-07 Thread Chr
ht now, so here's a: Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Just in case, if one of the patches really gets merged!) Thanks, Chr. --- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c 2007-08-08 00:52:52.0 +0200 +++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c 2007-08-08 00:55:45.0 +0200 @

Re: [PATCH] usbhid: add ASUS LCM to the blacklist

2007-07-30 Thread Chr
by quirk type. " But is there a Order for the bitfields? e.g shouldn't: hid-quriks.c (line 439, 440) { USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE, USB_DEVICE_ID_APPLE_FOUNTAIN_ANSI, HID_QUIRK_POWERBOOK_HAS_FN | HID_QUIRK_IGNORE_MOUSE } be: {..., ..., HID_QUIRK_IGNORE_MOUSE | HID_QUIRK_POWERBOOK_HAS_FN } A

Cleaning up the USBHID's blacklist.

2007-07-31 Thread Chr
On Tuesday, 31. July 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Chr wrote: > > > Ok, found it " hid_blacklist is alphabetically sorted blacklist by quirk > > type. " But is there a Order for the bitfields? e.g > > shouldn't: hid-quriks.c (l

Re: [PATCH] usbhid: add ASUS LCM to the blacklist

2007-10-12 Thread Chr
/asusoled/ maybe I could help. > > Regards, > Javier Bolaños Molina. > The project moved to sourceforge.net. The new maintainer is: Adilson Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks, Chr. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel&qu

Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5

2007-01-20 Thread Chr
On Saturday, 20. January 2007 03:41, Robert Hancock wrote: > Alistair John Strachan wrote: > > On Tuesday 16 January 2007 01:53, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> Robert Hancock wrote: > >>> I'll try your stress test when I get a chance, but I doubt I'll run > >>> into the same problem and I haven't seen any

Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5

2007-01-20 Thread Chr
On Saturday, 20. January 2007 20:59, you wrote: > Ian Kumlien wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I went from 2.6.19+sata_nv-adma-ncq-v7.patch, with no problems and adama > > enabled, to 2.6.20-rc5, which gave me problems almost instantly. > > > > I just thought that it might be interesting to know that it DID

Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5

2007-01-21 Thread Chr
0 00 05:30:59.654 IDENTIFY DEVICE ec 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 05:30:56.191 IDENTIFY DEVICE ca 00 28 02 ee 9a 0c 00 05:30:56.190 WRITE DMA ca 00 10 e8 4c 10 0a 00 05:30:56.190 WRITE DMA Maybe, it's really the HDD! OT: "http://www.nvidia.com/object/680i_hot

Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5

2007-01-21 Thread Chr
On Sunday, 21. January 2007 19:01, Björn Steinbrink wrote: > On 2007.01.21 18:34:40 +0100, Chr wrote: > > I run those two in parallel: > while /bin/true; do ls -lR / > /dev/null 2>&1; done > while /bin/true; do echo 255 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; sleep 1; done >

Re: SATA exceptions triggered by XFS (since 2.6.18)

2007-01-21 Thread Chr
rtctl -t] > > > SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1 > SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS > 100 Not_testing > 20 0 Not_testing > 300 Not_testing > 400

Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5

2007-01-22 Thread Chr
On Monday, 22. January 2007 03:39, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > Chr wrote: > > Ok, you won't believe this... I opened my case and rewired my drives... > > And guess what, my second (aka the "good") HDD is now failing! > > I guess, my mainboar

[PATCH] libata: adding ICH8M PCIIDs to ATA_PIIX.

2007-06-24 Thread Chr
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Gaston, Jason D wrote: > > I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one > > driver. Would they not conflict with each other? > > In Fedora 7, CONFIG_IDE is disabled. ata_piix drives all hardware at > that point. > >

Re: [patch 2.6.22-rc6] ATA: add a PCI ID for Intel Santa Rosa PATA controller

2007-07-06 Thread Chr
On Friday, 6. July 2007, Gaston, Jason D wrote: > >> > On the other hand, we can leave it, because of a > >"off-by-one error" in ata_piix.c, > >> > do_pata_set_dmamode, line ~770: > >> > [...] > >> > > > >Thanks, > &g

Re: [patch 2.6.22-rc6] ATA: add a PCI ID for Intel Santa Rosa PATA controller

2007-07-02 Thread Chr
t; PATA for compatibility reasons... > > Well, just FYI: on my Laptop AHCI is enabled and used for the SATA hard > disk. But the DVD drive still is a pata one afaics (I'm not in front of > the machine, so I can't check), connected via the pata controller -- so > for me there i

Re: [patch 2.6.22-rc6] ATA: add a PCI ID for Intel Santa Rosa PATA controller

2007-07-05 Thread Chr
e your controller/hdd/pc, so make backups and keep a first-aid kit handy!) > > On the other hand, we can leave it, because of a "off-by-one error" in > > ata_piix.c, > > do_pata_set_dmamode, line ~770: > > [...] > Thanks, Chr. --- a/drivers/ata