On 2007.01.21 00:39:20 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> >On 2007.01.20 22:34:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>Robert Hancock wrote:
> >>>change in 2.6.20-rc is either causing or triggering this problem. It
> >>>would be useful if you could try git bisect between 2.6.19 and
This hopefully is pretty much it for 1.5.0 modulo potential bugs
especially in newer topics. Aside from many bugfixes, changes
since -rc1 are:
- 'git log' is now reflog aware, and 'git show-branch' which
knew about reflog already has become much more useful with
reflogs.
- the porcelain/
Could I ask you what precisely is the driver you are talking about doing?
Why is it not going to be a part of mainline kernel (i.e. being able to be
put on blacklist easily).
It's a tiny driver and it hardy can be a part of the mainline kernel
because of its useless for everyone but me, bes
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 00:39 +0100, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Sunil and Ingo,
>
> Date: 2007-01-20 02:56:40 GMT (20 hours and 26 minutes ago)
> > 2007-01-20, Sunil Naidu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I did refer the same. Is it necessary to use only base kernel, say
> > 2.6.19? Or, can I go ahead
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
> On 1/19/07, Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That said, it's really confusing to pass a virtual address as an
> offset because:
>
>(a) mmap() has always worked with offset not addresses;
mmap maps some offset down a backing object to so
On 1/21/07, Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The overhead of timer interrupts at this low clockrate is significant
so I recommend to minimize the timer interrupt rate as far as possible.
This is really a tradeoff between latency and overhead and matters
much less on hardcores which run at
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:11:02 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the sysfs interface from the rtc framework seems to incorrectly label the add
> function with __devinit ... the proc and dev interfaces do not have this
> label on their add functions
>
> ive been trying to develop a
Introduce the TRUE and FALSE boolean macros so that everyone can
stop re-inventing them, and remove the one occurrence in the source
tree that clashes with that change.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
once this patch is applied, others can remove all of the superfluo
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So i think we should do the patch below - this makes reboot work even
in atomic contexts. [...]
hm, this causes problems if KVM is not active on a VT-capable CPU: even
on CPUs with VT supported, if a VT context is not actual
2.6.19.2:
# hddtemp /dev/sda
/dev/sda: WDC WD740GD-00FLC0: 27C
2.6.20-rc5:
# hddtemp /dev/sda
/dev/sda: ATA WDC WD740GD-00FL: S.M.A.R.T. not available
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at ht
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 05:16:21AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> 2.6.19.2:
> # hddtemp /dev/sda
> /dev/sda: WDC WD740GD-00FLC0: 27C
>
> 2.6.20-rc5:
> # hddtemp /dev/sda
> /dev/sda: ATA WDC WD740GD-00FL: S.M.A.R.T. not available
Subject: `hddtemp' no longer works
References : http://lkml.org/
Tony Foiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "David" == David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just last night I formatted some new "500GB" drives, and they
> eventually came back with 465GB as the displayed capacity. Wouldn't
> it make more sense to display that as "465GiB"?
[...]
> Dav
Dear reader,
I would like to report a bug with video cards of which I guess it is located in
the kernel (but not certain). It is only happening in FC6 not in Suse 10.2).
However I like FC6 better as Suse 10.2 and I would like to see this bug fixed.
I tried to install a bluecherry PV149 video cap
#include
* Bodo Eggert [Sun, Jan 21 2007, 11:40:40AM]:
> Tony Foiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> "David" == David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Just last night I formatted some new "500GB" drives, and they
> > eventually came back with 465GB as the displayed capacity. Wouldn
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 19:40 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the following possible cleanups:
- make needlessly global code static
- remove the following unused variable:
- debug.c: alloc_prints
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've committed this.
BTW: Do you rea
> > The overhead of timer interrupts at this low clockrate is significant
> > so I recommend to minimize the timer interrupt rate as far as possible.
> > This is really a tradeoff between latency and overhead and matters
> > much less on hardcores which run at hundreds of MHz. For power sensitive
BTW, as the upcoming v1.5.0 release will introduce quite a bit of
surface changes (although at the really core it still is the old
git and old ways should continue to work), I am wondering if it
would help people to try out and find wrinkles before the real
thing for me to cut a tarball and a set o
Thomas Meyer wrote:
Hi.
I have a few of these entries in my log buffer:
vmwrite error: reg 6802 value d19e0464 (err 26626)
[...]
Look's like a stack trace, but no oops. What does this mean? this
happens with kernel 2.6.20-rc4-gd39c9400 (two commits missing before
rc5, nothing kvm related, s
Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Saturday 20 January 2007 21:55, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>>> On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:13, Michael Tokarev wrote:
example, which isn't quite possible now from userspace. But as long as
O_DIRECT actually writes data before returning f
Hello!
I've 3 Servers which works wonderful with 2.6.16.X (also testet the
latest 2.6.16.37)
but with 2.6.18.6 i get these errors:
"general protection fault: [#1]"
"Modules linked in:"
"CPU:0"
"EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI"
"EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.18.6 #1) "
"EIP is at xfs_bmap_
On Sunday 21 January 2007 10:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I preffer
> > to stay on "stable" kernel on boxes which I use daily until next stable
> > appears.
>
> This is a very weird statement, the -rt kernel includes so much
> experimental work it cannot be called 'stable' by a long shot.
>
> Sure
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Ivan Ukhov wrote:
> It's a tiny driver and it hardy can be a part of the mainline kernel
> because of its useless for everyone but me, beside I don't want to make
> someone modify the kernel code.
Then, when this is a non-standard situation anyway, would calling
hid_disco
HiQ
> this is a new 2.6.20 module implementing a user inactivity trigger. Basically
> it acts as an event sniffer, issuing an ACPI event when no user activity is
> detected for more than a certain amount of time. This event can be
> successively
> grabbed and managed by an user-level daemon such
Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
"sed s/boolean/bool/" and remove "typedef bool boolean". Minor
comment-alignment fixes.
BusLogic.c includes FlashPoint.c.
Compile-tested with "allyes" and "allmod" on i386.
BusLogic.c | 42
BusLogic.h | 300
Hi!
> [RFC][PATCH] Power S3 Resume optimisation
> Here is a simple patch for optimising the S3 resume. With this
> patch the resume time is 0.85. Given the fact that device initialisation
> on the resume takes almost 70% of time, By executing the whole
> "device_resume()" function on a sepe
Hi Junio !
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 03:20:06AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> BTW, as the upcoming v1.5.0 release will introduce quite a bit of
> surface changes (although at the really core it still is the old
> git and old ways should continue to work), I am wondering if it
> would help people to
Also (apologies for the ignorance), how do I get the 1.5.0-rc2 release?
Bill
On Sunday, January 21, 2007 at 07:42:56 (-0600) Bill Lear writes:
>On Sunday, January 21, 2007 at 03:20:06 (-0800) Junio C Hamano writes:
>>BTW, as the upcoming v1.5.0 release will introduce quite a bit of
>>surface cha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 23:29, Len Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 January 2007 13:22, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > I have Toshiba Portege 4000 that almost always hangs dead resuming from
> > STR. This was better before 2.6.18, since then STR is unusabl
On Sunday, January 21, 2007 at 03:20:06 (-0800) Junio C Hamano writes:
>BTW, as the upcoming v1.5.0 release will introduce quite a bit of
>surface changes (although at the really core it still is the old
>git and old ways should continue to work), I am wondering if it
>would help people to try out
Jiri Kosina wrote:
Then, when this is a non-standard situation anyway, would calling
hid_disconnect() for the usb_interface of your driver be enough?
I can't even imagine how to call this very function. Could you give me
an example? After all, this function and friends of its aren't
EXPORTED
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 08:05:57AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:54:56AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 06:36:44PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> > > Now he must be careful about avoiding busy loops in the rest of the
> > > program, or he will
Sorry for starting a new thread, but I've deleted the messages from my
mail-box, and I'm sot sure it's the same problem as here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/14/108
Today I've decided to try XFS... and just doing anything on it
(extracting a tarball, for example) make my SATA HD go crazy ;)
> "BE" == Bodo Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BE> 1) This change isn't nescensary - any sane person will know that
BE> it's not a SI unit. You wouldn't talk about megabananas == 100
BE> bananas and expect to be taken seriously.
What about megaparsec? I have also seen graphs delimited
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 03:50:32PM +0100, Grzegorz Ja?kiewicz wrote:
> funny, how even very fast box can be useless for such activities with modern
> kernels, such as linux. After all, serial ports don't require too much
> horsepower to be highly accurate.
> >From designer perspective, I would rath
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:40:40AM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> 1) This change isn't nescensary - any sane person will know that it's not a
>SI unit. You wouldn't talk about megabananas == 100 bananas and
>expect to be taken seriously.
I've met quite a few non-sane persons then. I find
Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 03:20:06AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> BTW, as the upcoming v1.5.0 release will introduce quite a bit of
>> surface changes (although at the really core it still is the old
>> git and old ways should continue to work), I am wondering if it
>> woul
From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:03:42PM -0500
>
>
> My swap is on, 2GB ram and 2GB of swap on this machine. I can't go back
> to 2.6.17.13 as it does not recognize the NICs in my machine correctly and
> the Alsa Intel HD Audio driver has bugs etc, I guess
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:03:42PM -0500
> >
> >
> > My swap is on, 2GB ram and 2GB of swap on this machine. I can't go back
> > to 2.6.17.13 as it does not recognize the NICs in my machine correctly
Security fixes since 2.6.16.37:
- CVE-2006-4814: Fix incorrect user space access locking in mincore()
- CVE-2006-5173: i386: save/restore eflags in context switch
- CVE-2006-5749: Call init_timer() for ISDN PPP CCP reset state timer
- CVE-2006-5755: x86_64: Don't leak NT bit into next task
- CVE-20
21 Oca 2007 Paz tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız:
> RSS feed of the git tree:
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git;a=r
I already mailed to webmaster _at_ kernel.org 2 days ago but still all RSS
feeds gaves "Internal Server Error"
--
S.Çağlar Onur <[EMAIL PROTEC
David,
On 1/20/07, David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Leon said:]
> One way of getting rid of those inconsistencies would be to follow IEC
> 60027-2 for those cases where SI is inappropriate.
Talk about a cure worse than the disease! So you're saying that 256MB
flash
cards coul
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 05:36:03PM -0500, Rik van Riel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 01:53:15PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Even further development of such idea is to prevent such OOM condition
at all -
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > It's a tiny driver and it hardy can be a part of the mainline kernel
> > because of its useless for everyone but me, beside I don't want to
> > make someone modify the kernel code.
> Then, when this is a non-standard situation anyway, would calling
>
Paolo Ornati wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:29:32 +0100
Paolo Ornati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry for starting a new thread, but I've deleted the messages from my
mail-box, and I'm sot sure it's the same problem as here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/14/108
Today I've decided to try X
On Sunday, 21. January 2007 09:36, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2007.01.21 00:39:20 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
>
> Ah, right... sata_nv.c of course interacts with the outside world, d'oh!
>
> Up to now, I only got bad kernels, latest tested being:
> 94fcda1f8ab5e0cacc381c5ca1cc9aa6ad523576
>
> Wh
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 05:03 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> Introduce the TRUE and FALSE boolean macros so that everyone can
> stop re-inventing them, and remove the one occurrence in the source
> tree that clashes with that change.
>
If you're going to introduce true and false macros, you sho
On 2007.01.21 18:34:40 +0100, Chr wrote:
> On Sunday, 21. January 2007 09:36, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> > On 2007.01.21 00:39:20 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> >
> > Ah, right... sata_nv.c of course interacts with the outside world, d'oh!
> >
> > Up to now, I only got bad kernels, latest tested bei
> .. which wouldn't help you either, supposing that you don't want to touch
> the kernel sources at all, because this function is unexported and static.
>
> So I think that there is no straightforward way, sorry.
>
> Is this a device that doesn't exist anywhere else than on your table? I
> still th
On 2007.01.21 09:36:18 +0100, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2007.01.21 00:39:20 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> > >On 2007.01.20 22:34:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >>Robert Hancock wrote:
> > >>>change in 2.6.20-rc is either causing or triggering this problem. It
> >
Nicholas Miell wrote:
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 05:03 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
Introduce the TRUE and FALSE boolean macros so that everyone can
stop re-inventing them, and remove the one occurrence in the source
tree that clashes with that change.
If you're going to introduce true
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:03:42PM -0500
> >
> >
> > My swap is on, 2GB ram and 2GB of swap on this machine. I can't go back
> > to 2.6.17.13 as it does not recognize the NICs in my machine correctly
From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:48:07AM -0500
>
> What about all of the changes with NAT? I see that it operates on
> level-3/network wise, I enabled that and backward compatiblity support as
> well, but when my iptables rules kick in, it says no such drive
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:48:07AM -0500
> >
> > What about all of the changes with NAT? I see that it operates on
> > level-3/network wise, I enabled that and backward compatiblity support as
> > we
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Good luck,
> > Jurriaan
> > --
> > > What does ELF stand for (in respect to Linux?)
> > ELF is the first rock group that Ronnie James Dio performed with back in
> > the early 1970's. In constrast, a.out is a misspelling of the Fren
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 04:10:58PM +0100, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
> you're right, I used wrong term to describe.
> But the problem still exists. Nowadays it should be possible to run many
> serial ports fully accurate "at the same time". It is also true that the
> same problem exists in windows,
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 08:05:57AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hmmm the busy loop is dirty as hell, even on SMP, but it works ;-)
> I remember is was possible to reprogram the RTC to interrupt at 8192 Hz.
> If the task is running with real time prio, it should get this accuracy,
> or am I mistake
- reduce the userspace visible part
- fix the in-kernel compilation
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 6 Jan 2007
include/linux/Kbuild |2 +-
include/linux/xattr.h |8
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux
- #ifdef guard this header for multiple inclusion
- adjust the #include's to what is actually required by this header
- remove an unneeded #ifdef
- #endif comments
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 6 Jan 2007
include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h |
Hello,
It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times.
ierdnac ~ # cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
0: 19690962 21390 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 34666 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
8: 12 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:32:02 -0600
Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like what you're getting is an actual NCQ write timing out.
> That makes the bisect result not very interesting since obviously it
> wouldn't have issued any NCQ writes before NCQ support was
> implemented. S
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 08:05:52PM +0100, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
>
> But on the other hand, PC nowadays are capable of handling RT tasks +
> running multiple programs in background, but OS has to be build from ground
> up to handle such conditions (I guess most RTOSes are justa about that, but
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Nicholas Miell wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 05:03 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > Introduce the TRUE and FALSE boolean macros so that everyone can
> > stop re-inventing them, and remove the one occurrence in the
> > source tree that clashes with that change.
> If you'r
Björn Steinbrink wrote:
All kernels were bad using that approach. So back to square 1. :/
Björn
OK guys, here's a new patch to try against 2.6.20-rc5:
Right now when switching between ADMA mode and legacy mode (i.e. when
going from doing normal DMA reads/writes to doing a FLUSH CACHE) we ju
Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 15/11/06, William D Waddington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried submitting a patch a while back:
"[PATCH] IRQ: ease out-of-tree migration to new irq_handler prototype"
to add #define __PT_REGS to include/linux/interrupt.h to flag the change
to the new interrupt handler p
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> David Schwartz wrote:
> > Talk about a cure worse than the disease! So you're saying that 256MB
> > flash
> > cards could be advertised as having 268.4MB? A 512MB RAM stick is
> > mislabelled and could correctly say 536.8MB? That's just plain crazine
On Sunday 21 January 2007 13:09, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 January 2007 21:55, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >> Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:13, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> example, which isn't quite possible now from userspace. Bu
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Yeah, and Ethernet speed is measured in Mbps, not Mibps.
Indeed.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
P
On Sunday, 21. January 2007 19:01, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2007.01.21 18:34:40 +0100, Chr wrote:
>
> I run those two in parallel:
> while /bin/true; do ls -lR / > /dev/null 2>&1; done
> while /bin/true; do echo 255 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; sleep 1; done
>
> Not sure if running them in paral
Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anything you can do to make tester's life easier will always slightly
> increase the number of testers.
> ...
> Pre-release tar.gz and rpms coupled with a freshmeat announcement should
> get you a bunch of testers and newcomers. This will give the new do
After commit d3dcc077bf88806201093f86325ec656e4dbfbce,
include/linux/if_{addr,link}.h should be processed with unifdef.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/Kbuild |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/include/linux/K
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- proper prototypes in header files for global variables and functions
- make the following needlessly global struct static:
- auth_gss/gss_spkm3_seal.c: struct cast5_cbc_oid
- make the following needlessly global variables static:
- xprtsock.c: xprt_
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:26:27PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.20-rc3-mm1:
>...
> git-netdev-all.patch
>...
> git trees
>...
Since it's no longer used, this "#define BCM_TSO 1" can now be removed.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/
Junio C Hamano wrote:
One worry I had about releasing git-1.5.0-rc2-1.rpm and friends
just like the "official" ones was that people might have scripts
to automate downloading & updating of packages, and they may not
like to get "beta" installed for them.
I wonder if kernel.org machines are also
Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anything you can do to make tester's life easier will always slightly
> > increase the number of testers.
> > ...
> > Pre-release tar.gz and rpms coupled with a freshmeat announcement should
> > get you a bunc
Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, as the upcoming v1.5.0 release will introduce quite a bit of
> surface changes (although at the really core it still is the old
> git and old ways should continue to work), I am wondering if it
> would help people to try out and find wrinkles before
Why does copying an 18GB on a 74GB raptor raid1 cause the kernel to invoke
the OOM killer and kill all of my processes?
Doing this on a single disk 2.6.19.2 is OK, no issues. However, this
happens every time!
Anything to try? Any other output needed? Can someone shed some light on
this situ
seagate_st0x_detect() can become static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 6 Jan 2007
--- linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1/drivers/scsi/seagate.c.old 2007-01-05
22:53:13.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc3-mm1/drivers/scsi/seagate.c 2007-01-05 22:57:
Using assembler code for performance in drivers might have been a good
idea 15 years ago when this code was written, but with today's compilers
that's unlikely to be an advantage.
Besides this, it also hurts the readability.
Simply use the C code that was already there as an alternative.
Signe
The SCSI_ACORNSCSI_3 driver:
- has been marked as BROKEN for more than one year and
- is still marked as BROKEN.
Drivers that had been marked as BROKEN for such a long time seem to be
unlikely to be revived in the forseeable future.
But if anyone wants to ever revive this driver, the code is stil
On Sunday, 21. January 2007 20:25, Paolo Ornati wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:32:02 -0600
> Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It looks like what you're getting is an actual NCQ write timing out.
> > That makes the bisect result not very interesting since obviously it
> > wouldn't
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
So write a kernel driver. It's not like we're locking anybody out.
There is certainly enough Amateur Radio/Linux crossover that a kernel
enhancement to support Amateur Radio is going to get frowned upon.
Argh! Not only did the message go out twice, but that should h
S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
21 Oca 2007 Paz tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız:
RSS feed of the git tree:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git;a=r
I already mailed to webmaster _at_ kernel.org 2 days ago but still all RSS
feeds gaves "Internal Server Error"
We're aw
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 06:37:24PM +0200, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> 21 Oca 2007 Paz tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız:
> > RSS feed of the git tree:
> > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git;a=r
>
> I already mailed to webmaster _at_ kernel.org 2 days ago but still all
Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 06:37:24PM +0200, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
21 Oca 2007 Paz tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız:
RSS feed of the git tree:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git;a=r
I already mailed to webmaster _at_ kernel.org 2 days ago but s
On Jan 19 2007 10:11, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>> this is a new 2.6.20 module implementing a user inactivity trigger. Basically
>> it acts as an event sniffer, issuing an ACPI event when no user activity is
>> detected for more than a certain amount of time. This event can be
>> successively
>> grab
>How fast is your Ethernet port? 100Mbps or 95.37Mbps?
Same lie like with harddrives. It's around 80, not 100.
But it depends on how you look at it. 80 for Layer3, possibly
a little more for Layer2/1.
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
Dear all,
What is the status with respect to this problem? I see that in the
current -rt patch the problematic code piece is different. I personally
haven't tried to reproduce this myself on a more recent kernel, but I
just got a report from one of our users who experienced the same problem
w
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote:
> It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times.
>
Hi,
The e100_resume() function should be calling netif_device_detach and
free_irq. Could you try the following (compile tested) patch?
Regards,
Frederik
Signed-off
On Jan 21 2007 17:06, Heikki Orsila wrote:
>
>> 2) No sane person would say kibibyte as required by the standard. You'd need
>>a sppech defect in order to do this, and a mental defect in order to try.
>>So why should anybody adhere to the rest of this bullshit?
>
>I think I'm not sane then
On Jan 21 2007 00:14, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 11:42:37PM +, sathesh babu wrote:
>
>> I am trying to run Linux-2.6.18.2 ( with preemption enable)
>> kernel on FPGA board which has MIPS24KE processor runs at 12
>> MHZ. Programmed the timer to give interrupt at every 10
On Jan 21 2007 02:29, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
>After switching ext3 to xfs, i realize system starts to _really_
>unresponsive and extracting tarballs,
Please have a look at http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/22/278
-`J'
--
At Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:16:04 +0100,
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 17:37 +0300, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> > This patch removes the dropping of ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE upon execution of
> > setuid
> > binaries.
> >
> > Why? The answer consists of two parts:
> >
> > Firstly, there are val
This is the latest submittal of the patchset providing support for the
Attansic L1 gigabit ethernet adapter. This patchset is built against
kernel version 2.6.20-rc5.
This version incorporates all comments from:
Christoph Hellwig:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/11/43
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/
From: Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch contains the build files for the Attansic L1 gigabit ethernet
adapter driver.
Signed-off-by: Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Kconfig | 11 ++
From: Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch contains the header files needed by the Attansic L1 gigabit
ethernet adapter driver.
Signed-off-by: Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
atl1.h| 288 +++
From: Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch contains auxiliary C files for the Attansic L1 gigabit ethernet
adapter driver.
Signed-off-by: Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
atl1_ethtool.c | 436 +++
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Bill Lear wrote:
> Also (apologies for the ignorance), how do I get the 1.5.0-rc2 release?
Direct your browser to
http://repo.or.cz/w/git.git?a=snapshot;h=eaf6459e4d482af51429f9464125621b805eb5f
BTW please don't top post. It uses bandwidth unnecessarily (both in terms
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Bill Lear wrote:
>
>> Also (apologies for the ignorance), how do I get the 1.5.0-rc2 release?
>
> Direct your browser to
>
> http://repo.or.cz/w/git.git?a=snapshot;h=eaf6459e4d482af51429f9464125621b805eb5f
Better URL is
http://repo.or.cz/w/g
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:56:13PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch removes kernel 2.4 compatibility code.
Looks correct to me, thanks.
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> drivers/net/irda/vlsi_ir.c | 16 --
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote:
It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times.
The e100_resume() function should be calling netif_device_detach and
free_irq. Could you try the following (compile tested) patch?
I just f
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
