Sorry for the inconvenience, i missed kernel version number. The patch is
written for 2.6.8 kernel.
--
Best regards,
Pavel Fedin,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel
> layout is the most likely patch to have broken things... I haven't
> confirmed it is this particular patch yet, tomorrow I'll get some time to
> do it ..
>
okay running client applications using
setarch -L i386 glxgears
makes them work.. I'll start looking for a bug in the the SIS client
sid
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 11:11 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > + char *kobj_path = NULL;
> > + char *action_string = NULL;
> > + char **envp = NULL;
> > + char ppid_string[FORK_BUFFER_SIZE];
> > + char cpid_string[FORK_BUFFER_SIZE];
> > +
> > + if (!uevent_sock)
> > + return;
> > +
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:06:51 -0500, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 17:16 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > All distros are trying to reduce boot time.
>
> They certainly aren't all trying very hard. Debian and Fedora (last
> time I checked) do not even run the init scripts
Paolo Ciarrocchi schrieb:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:06:51 -0500, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 17:16 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
All distros are trying to reduce boot time.
They certainly aren't all trying very hard. Debian and Fedora (last
time I checked) do not even run the
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:26:35 -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
> Droebbel wrote:
> > On recent kernels, writing to DVD-RAM is much slower than to be
> > expected. A 3x Writer should do about 1.9MB/s including automatic
> > verify. This is what I get with 2.6.7 up to bk7. However, from 2.6.7-bk8
> > to
Piotr Kaczuba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> Is there a reason why "PCI access mode" config option isn't available for
> x86_64? Due to this, PCIE config options aren't available either.
There is no 64bit PCI BIOS, so access is always direct.
I assume you mean mmconfig access with "PCIE c
I have a dual processor AMD machine.
It give apic errors after running for a while. (Usually after heavy
disk i/o.)
APIC error on CPU0: 02(02)
APIC error on CPU1: 02(02)
After this occurs, read/writes to/from the drive slow down
substantially.
Unless...
If I set the scheduler to deadline (e
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:18:43AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Piotr Kaczuba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there a reason why "PCI access mode" config option isn't available for
> > x86_64? Due to this, PCIE config options aren't available either.
>
> There is no 64bit PCI BIOS, so access is a
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Larry McVoy wrote:
> wasn't our intent. What we would like to do is change the language to
> say that if you use BK you are agreeing that you won't work on another
> SCM for 1 year after you stop using BK. But after that you would be
Hypothetical question (for me, since I do
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 02:21:03PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Based on feedback from Jean Delvare and Pekka Enberg, here is an
> > updated version.
>
> Works for me (Vaio PCG-GR214EP). Tested with 2.6.11-rc3-bk8.
>
> I then enabled the debug mode. I couldn't find anything relevant WRT
> what
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
Hi!
I've reimplemented the Lifebook touchscreen driver using libps2 and
input, to make it short and fitting into the kernel drivers.
Please comment on code and test for functionality!
PS.: The driver should register two input devices. It doesn't yet,
since that isn't very stra
Hi,
this oneliner fixes the situation that I can enter a year to blacklist
ACPI devices if ACPI is completely disabled.
Signed-off-by: Rolf Eike Beer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.11-rc3/drivers/acpi/Kconfig 2005-02-07 21:12:45.0
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc3/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
On Mo, 2005-02-14 at 09:53 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
>I also have low write performance (around 300 kb/s) with several 2.6
>kernels (2.6.7 to 2.6.9-mm1) and I can hear the head jump around when I
>use ext2 or UDF. It will be fast when written directly to the device
>without a file system using dd.
> Then turn off both read and write cache on the card ...
We've tried with no cache and we had multiple failures over the weekend.
We are running 2.4.20 on some of these boxes and it is stable. We're
only having problems with the 2.6 kernel.
These systems did stay running for a few hours and th
Hello,
I was unable to compile hotplug-ng against klibc until this patch went
in:
--- /dev/null 2005-02-14 09:23:10.0 +0100
+++ hotplug-ng/klibc/include/features.h 2005-02-11 16:18:35.0
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+#ifndef_FEATURES_H
+#define_FEATURES_H 1
+
+#endif
Hello,
> Currently, in almost every PCI driver, if pci_request_regions() fails --
> indicating another driver is using the hardware -- then
> pci_disable_device() is called on the error path, disabling a device
> that another driver is using
>
> To call this "rather rude" is an understatement
Stelian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Privately I've had many positive feedbacks from users of this driver
> (and no negative feedback), including Linux distributions who wish
> to include it into their kernels. The reports are increasing in number,
> it would seem that newer Sony Vaios are mor
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:53:10AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Stelian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Privately I've had many positive feedbacks from users of this driver
> > (and no negative feedback), including Linux distributions who wish
> > to include it into their kernels. The rep
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:43:02AM +0100, Michal Rokos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Currently, in almost every PCI driver, if pci_request_regions() fails --
> > indicating another driver is using the hardware -- then
> > pci_disable_device() is called on the error path, disabling a device
> > that ano
Hi all,
I only just noticed this, but been building kernel source for a long time. On
my 233 over ssh, it is a bit slow, and I just noticed this output when doing
a 'make menuconfig':
make[1]: `scripts/fixdep' is up to date.
scripts/kconfig/mconf arch/i386/Kconfig
optimize && ?
optimize &&
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 17:22 -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Why not simply disable CONFIG_GCOV for him, in this case?
>
> Anton presumably turned on CONFIG_GCOV because he wanted to do some
> profiling...
Yes. I finally found a way to get it to compile. Compiling without
Hi,
I get a few Debug messages of the form from UML:
Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at
include/asm/arch/semaphore.h:107
in_atomic():0, irqs_disabled():1
Call Trace:
087d77b0: [<0809aaa5>] __might_sleep+0x135/0x180
087d77d8: [<084d377f>] mcount+0xf/0x20
087d77e0: [<0807cc1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:47:01AM +0100, Piotr Kaczuba wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:18:43AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Piotr Kaczuba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Is there a reason why "PCI access mode" config option isn't available for
> > > x86_64? Due to this, PCIE config options a
This patch removes unreachable code in cn_netlink_send() function.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Thouvenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- drivers/connector/connector.c.orig 2005-02-14 12:52:32.0 +0100
+++ drivers/connector/connector.c 2005-02-14 12:52:44.0 +0100
@@ -119,11 +119,6 @@ vo
Hello Andrew!
Attached patch adds functions ufs_quota_read() and ufs_quota_write()
to the UFS code. So quotas for UFS should work again (they were broken by
the quota io redesign). I don't actually think the patch is too much
important as I'm not sure anybody uses quotas on UFS but we're in th
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:08:02 -0800, Larry McVoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is to clarify the non-compete stuff. We've had some people who have
> indicated that they believed that if they used BK they were agreeing
> that they would never work on another SCM system. We can see how it
> is possib
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Nick Warne wrote:
> Are the optimize && ? lines normal?
They are only debug prints, but I'm quite sure they are fixed in recent
versions.
> This is from a current tree that has an uptime of > 50 days
Could you specify "current tree"?
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe f
Hi Stelian, all,
On 2005-02-14, Stelian Pop wrote:
> I have some interesting information from one user, who noticed that:
>
> * pbr is the power-on brightness. It's the brightness that the
> laptop uses at power-on time.
Hey, that makes full sense. After playing around with the debug mode, I
n
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 13:01 +0100, Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
> This patch removes unreachable code in cn_netlink_send() function.
The code can be reach via
nlh = NLMSG_PUT(skb, 0, msg->seq, NLMSG_DONE, size - sizeof(*nlh));
So the patch is wrong
Sorry for that
Guillaume
-
To unsubscribe from
On Monday 14 February 2005 12:12, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Nick Warne wrote:
> > Are the optimize && ? lines normal?
>
> They are only debug prints, but I'm quite sure they are fixed in recent
> versions.
>
> > This is from a current tree that has an uptime of > 50 days
>
> Coul
On Mo, 2005-02-14 at 11:53 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:25:34 +0100, Droebbel wrote:
>> Which 2.6.7 did you use?
>
>Only 2.6.7 with a -mm patch, since vanilla 2.6.7 screwed up my system
>clock, and the noapic option which was suggested to unscrew the clock
>screwed up the
A significant portion of the operations reside in the Adapter Firmware,
the driver report is essentially telling us the Adapter is locking up.
In the Adaptec branch of the driver there is an AAC_DETAILED_STATUS_INFO
manifest in aacraid.h that would enable firmware prints. The Firmware
that exists
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:13:30PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
>
> Hi Stelian, all,
>
> On 2005-02-14, Stelian Pop wrote:
> > I have some interesting information from one user, who noticed that:
> >
> > * pbr is the power-on brightness. It's the brightness that the
> > laptop uses at power-on t
Hi,
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Nick Warne wrote:
> So I can ignore the debug prints?
Yes.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read t
Russell King wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:40:53AM +, Russell King wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:05:01PM +, Russell King wrote:
[...]
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
.tmp_vmlinux1: error: undefined symbol(s) found:
w kallsyms_addresses
w kallsyms_markers
w kallsyms_na
On Monday 14 February 2005 03:08, Larry McVoy wrote:
> This is a heads up that the BK tree for the kernel is currently at 59,000
> changesets give or take a few. The BK that you are using uses unsigned
> shorts for the internal names of each delta which means you folks are
> about 100 days away fr
hi all,
I am looking for ways to debug those device drivers that have been written as
loadable modules
and loaded on fly and not complied with kernel. Using printks do help and
looing at debug
messages also help but at time of crach during development, its very difficult
to find the exact
lo
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 12:54 -0500, James Morris wrote:
> Making a generic N-way scatterlist processor is pointless
> overengineering, causing new problems with non-trivial solutions, for
> no benefit whatsoever.
I respectfully disagree. I spend the last few days thinking about a
solution about op
Alle 11:35, giovedì 10 febbraio 2005, Andrew Morton ha scritto:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.
>6.11-rc3-mm2/
I was trying to use the skge module for my Intel 3c940 card, in place of the
(working) sk98lin.
It gives the following:
Feb 14 14:16:35 nb
Trying to build latest kernel with !CONFIG_PCI and with
CONFIG_ISAPNP=y && CONFIG_PNPBIOS=y
I got the following build error:
LDvmlinux
drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x5486): In function
'pnpbios_parse_allocated_irqresource':
: undefined reference to 'pcibios_penalize_isa_irq'
Clearly pcibios_pen
Roland added this include with his 'waitid system call' patch, which
was removed again after a while. Just the header inclusion was not
removed.
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -purNx tags ../linux-2.6.11-rc4
Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:51:11PM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
While executing
iptables -t nat -D OUTPUT -d 80.126.170.174 -p tcp --dport https -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.1
iptables -t nat -D OUTPUT -d 80.126.170.174 -p tcp --dport http -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:03:49PM +0100, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:51:11PM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> >
[...]
> >still present in -rc4:
> >kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001] code:
> >ip/6351
> >kernel: caller is get_next_c
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 22:11, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> From: Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Clean LSM stub file
> References: 40217, 39439
>
> Rather than having every LSM hook twice, once for the case with
> CONFIG_SECURITY enabled and once for the disabled case, put
> everything in one
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 14:13 +0100, Mws wrote:
> On Monday 14 February 2005 03:08, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > wasn't our intent. What we would like to do is change the language to
> > say that if you use BK you are agreeing that you won't work on another
> > SCM for 1 year after you stop using BK. Bu
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:08:58PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:08:02 -0800, Larry McVoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > is to clarify the non-compete stuff. We've had some people who have
> > indicated that they believed that if they used BK they were agreeing
>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 04:01:11PM +0100, Christophe Lucas wrote:
> If PCI request regions fails, then someone else is using the
> hardware we wish to use. For that one case, calling
> pci_disable_device() is rather rude.
> See : http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0502.1/1061.html
Actua
Dear All,
How to get maximum output from dmesg command?
I am unable to see all my debug messages after loading my driver.
I think there is a restriction in displaying the dmesg output.
I saw in printk.c file under source directory. There I found LOG_BUF_LEN
is 16384.
But I am unable to see not
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 12:17:25PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Ray Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > set of pages associated with a particular process need to be moved.
> > The kernel interface that we are proposing is the following:
> >
> > page_migrate(pid, va_start, va_end, count, old_nodes,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 01:04:22PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 19:26 -0800, Ray Bryant wrote:
> > This patch introduces the sys_page_migrate() system call:
> >
> > sys_page_migrate(pid, va_start, va_end, count, old_nodes, new_nodes);
> >
> > Its intent is to cause the pages
This patch applies to the kernel 2.6.11-rc3.
It moves the code that informs the kernel if the particular interrupt is edge
triggered
or level sensitive from the board specific file to a
"CONFIG_VIRTEX_II_PRO-specific" file.
Using old IRQ numbering in that code is also fixed.
Signed-off-by: Andrei
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:08:20AM -0500, Jeff Sipek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:08:58PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:08:02 -0800, Larry McVoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > is to clarify the non-compete stuff. We've had some people who have
> > > in
Hi,
This patch introduces a new sysctl for NUMA systems that tries to drop
as much of the page cache as possible from a set of nodes. The
motivation for this patch is for setting up High Performance Computing
jobs, where initial memory placement is very important to overall
performance.
Curren
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:02:05PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:47:01AM +0100, Piotr Kaczuba wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:18:43AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Piotr Kaczuba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Is there a reason why "PCI access mode" config option
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:20:34 +0100
Fruhwirth Clemens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Conclusion: The idea of high-mem and low-mem seperation is fundamentally
> broken. The limitation of page table entries to a fixed set is causing
> more complications than it solves. Laziness to do things right at me
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:03:45AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Can you see Ford Motors telling
> someone that you can't go work for GM if you drive a Ford?
You paid for the Ford. Suppose Ford offered to give you the car but
said if you take it then you can't go work at GM because this car is
a
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
>
> this oneliner fixes the situation that I can enter a year to blacklist
> ACPI devices if ACPI is completely disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rolf Eike Beer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hmm.. Wouldn't it be even better to make it depend on ACPI_INTERPRETER?
Af
Hi Srinivas :)
* Srinivas G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> How to get maximum output from dmesg command?
> I am unable to see all my debug messages after loading my driver.
> I think there is a restriction in displaying the dmesg output.
> I saw in printk.c file under source directory. Ther
i saw the following oops when trying to swsusp (echo disk >
/sys/power/state) my thinkpad r40. everything worked fine, except for
this debug message:
Stopping tasks:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:08:20AM -0500, Jeff Sipek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:08:58PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:08:02 -0800, Larry McVoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is to clarify the non-compete stuff. We've
Nick Piggin wrote:
Your one liner would fix the problem too, of course. The important
thing at this stage is that it gets fixed for 2.6.11.
Sorry, have been off the net last week.
Thank you for the patches. Have tested Ingo's one liner.
It works fine for me, as expected.
Bodo
-
To unsubscribe from
I didn't see a final ACK on this patch -- just checking for one :)
P.
Prarit Bhargava wrote:
I've taken into account Dmitry's comments (thanks Dmitry!) and
generated a new patch.
Thanks,
P.
Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Friday, January 21, 2005 8:35 am, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
No. But vacant ports usua
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 10:29:14PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 01:54:26PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 12:17:25PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Ray Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > set of pages associated with a particular process need
Hi,
Selon Nomad Arton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> matthieu castet schrieb:
> >
> > I have done other tests.
> >
> > If I use grabdisplay mode the problem doesn't occur.
> > If using overlay mode with port 54 the problem is present.
> >
> > I have also try the cvs bttv driver and the problem isn't fixe
Srinivas G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How to get maximum output from dmesg command?
> I am unable to see all my debug messages after loading my driver.
> I think there is a restriction in displaying the dmesg output.
There is indeed.
> I saw in printk.c file under source directory. There I
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> /* Condition for invocation of non-default security_op */
> #define COND_SECURITY(seop, def) \
> - (likely(security_ops == &capability_security_ops))? def:
> security_ops->seop
> + (unlikely(security_enabled))? security_ops->seop: def
So t
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Kurt Garloff wrote:
The case that security_ops points to the default capability_
security_ops is the fast path and arguably the more likely one
on most systems.
Quite a few distributions ship with other security modules
enabled by default, so I'm not sure we should add a "likel
>-Original Message-
>From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 12:10 PM
>To: Seth, Rohit
>Cc: Kirill Korotaev; Linus Torvalds; Saxena, Sunil; Pallipadi,
>Venkatesh; Andrey Savochkin; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: possible CPU bug and reques
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 07:56 -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:20:34 +0100
> Fruhwirth Clemens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Conclusion: The idea of high-mem and low-mem seperation is fundamentally
> > broken. The limitation of page table entries to a fixed set is causing
>
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:06:39 +0100
Fruhwirth Clemens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with having special methods, that lack generality
> but are superior in performance. There is something wrong, when there
> are no other. And there are no other for holding three kmappings or m
> >So how would you suggest that we resolve it? The protection we need is
> >that people don't get to
> >
> > - use BK
> > - stop using BK so they can go work on another system
> > - start using BK again
> > - stop using BK so they can go work on another system
>
> What??? Why not? BK is
On 2005-02-14, at 16:40, Larry McVoy wrote:
So how would you suggest that we resolve it? The protection we need is
that people don't get to
- use BK
- stop using BK so they can go work on another system
- start using BK again
- stop using BK so they can go work on another system
On Monday 14 February 2005 09:14, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> Give me a break!
> Did may the idea perhaps occur to you that maybe the above wish list is:
>
> 1. Utterly immoral.
> 2. Something you are by no ways entitled to have.
>
> If you want to be compensated for BK then put a price tag on it.
> S
On 2005-02-14, at 17:00, Larry McVoy wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:03:45AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
Can you see Ford Motors telling
someone that you can't go work for GM if you drive a Ford?
You paid for the Ford. Suppose Ford offered to give you the car but
said if you take it then you ca
Hi Rogério :)
* Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> Srinivas G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I saw in printk.c file under source directory. There I found LOG_BUF_LEN
> > is 16384.
> Sorry if this is obvious, but have you considered using the -s option of
> dmesg?
Of course, ther
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 09:07 -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:06:39 +0100
> Fruhwirth Clemens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There is nothing wrong with having special methods, that lack generality
> > but are superior in performance. There is something wrong, when there
> >
> By the way, while we're talking of remove_exclusive_swap_page:
> a more functional issue I sometimes wonder about, why don't we
> remove_exclusive_swap_page on write fault? Keeping the swap slot
> is valuable if read fault, but once the page is dirtied, wouldn't
> it usually be better to free th
On Monday 14 February 2005 09:14, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> 1. Utterly immoral.
> 2. Something you are by no ways entitled to have.
>
> If you want to be compensated for BK then put a price tag on it.
Excellent idea. At the volumes you are using it now that's $65M/year.
That's what we'd charge for
Hello,
I bought 2 Ovislink GE8169 because they're made with realtek 8169 chipset.
I make a new kernel with r8169 compiled as a module.
I can load r8169.o module without any error or warning. Cards negociate
at 1000Mb/s, so everything looks ok.
I can ping both from each other.
and now is the stran
> In 2.6, drivers/input/power.c would only have been built if
> CONFIG_INPUT_POWER was enabled - but it is nowhere possible to enable
> this option.
That was written a long time ago before the new power management went in.
On PDA's there is a power button and suspend button. So this was a hook
Linux 2.6 Compile Statistics (gcc 3.4.1)
Web page with links to complete details:
http://developer.osdl.org/cherry/compile/
Kernel bzImagebzImage bzImage modules bzImage modules
(defconfig) (allno) (allyes) (allyes) (allmod) (allmod)
--- --- --
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 09:26:49AM +0100, Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
>
> I'm using kobject because it allows to notify user space application by
> sending an event and as I need to send a kernel event (fork event) to a
> user space application I thought about kobject. Do you think that it's
> not
Fruhwirth Clemens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First, one has to make kmap fallible.
I think it would be relatively simple and sane to modify the existing
kmap() implementations to add a new try_kmap() which is atomic and returns
failure if it would have needed to sleep.
That being said, kmap()
> So how would you suggest that we resolve it? The protection we need is
> that people don't get to
>
>- use BK
>- stop using BK so they can go work on another system
>- start using BK again
>- stop using BK so they can go work on another system
>...
>
I guess I don't see th
Dear Linux gurus,
this is a minor bug that is puzzling me since my switch from 2.6.7 to
2.6.9 (and continuing with 2.6.11-rc1).
When I press the suspend key on my Vaio FX701, nothing happens. It
should trigger an ACPI event that, caught by acpid, run the suspend
script
--- Markus Plail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't help you, but just want to say that I also see those errors
> on a local xfs file system, so it doesn't seem to be a NFS problem
> I was first seeing this with 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 on a directory with 8k.
Hmm, I played about a bit with XFS, but cou
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:30:33PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 22:11, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> > Rather than having every LSM hook twice, once for the case with
> > CONFIG_SECURITY enabled and once for the disabled case, put
> > everything in one inline funct
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > By the way, while we're talking of remove_exclusive_swap_page:
> > a more functional issue I sometimes wonder about, why don't we
> > remove_exclusive_swap_page on write fault? Keeping the swap slot
> > is valuable if read fault, but once the page i
Alex Tomas wrote:
Good day all,
I've updated the patchset against 2.6.10. A bunch of bugs have been
fixed and mballoc now behaves smarter a bit. Extents and mballoc
patches collects some stats they print upon umount. NOTE: they must
not be used to store important data. A lot of things are to be
On 2005-02-14, at 18:49, Larry McVoy wrote:
r it we'd be happy to negotiate a standard
click-wrap style license as part of the deal. Everyone would like that
much better it seems. Are you volunteering to pay?
I'm not since I'm not using and I don't intend to use BK.
Oh BTW. the main reason for me
On 2005-02-14, at 19:17, Matthew Jacob wrote:
I mean- you're certainly free to impose whatever license you want, and
others are free to be happy or unhappy with that. I'm just trying to
figure out what you're actually trying to accomplish here.
He is simply plain dishonest about his intentions. And
Umm- can't say I agree. I've known Larry since, oh, 1988, and up to
about 18 months ago I lived about 3 blocks away from him and his
family.
Larry is pretty honest. He certainly isn't as evil as many on this
list make him out to be.
>
> He is simply plain dishonest about his intentions. And sinc
Hi all,
> > > * pbr is the power-on brightness. It's the brightness that the
> > > laptop uses at power-on time.
> >
> > Will test this evening.
I can confirm, that works for me too.
> > > * cdp is the CD-ROM power. Writing 0 to cdp turns off the cdrom in
> > > order to save a bit of power
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 09:49 -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Monday 14 February 2005 09:14, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 09:23:03AM -0800, Russell Miller wrote:
> > It is certainly Larry's choice to license his software any way he chooses.
> >
> > It is my choice whether or not t
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 07:52 -0600, Robin Holt wrote:
> The node mask is a list of allowed. This is intended to be as near
> to a one-to-one migration path as possible.
If that's the case, it would make the kernel internals a bit simpler to
only take a "from" and "to" node, instead of those maps.
Hi Larry,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry McVoy) writes:
> The protection we need is that people don't get to
>
> - use BK
> - stop using BK so they can go work on another system
> - start using BK again
> - stop using BK so they can go work on another system
> ...
>
> We could say th
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:17:35AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > So how would you suggest that we resolve it? The protection we need is
> > that people don't get to
> >
> >- use BK
> >- stop using BK so they can go work on another system
> >- start using BK again
> >- stop using
I've tried to configure the SL811 driver with 2.6.11 for mach-pxa
platform, but it doesn't work: The hub was recognized, but no device
(I've tested it with a USB mouse and keyboard). The hub is visible in
proc/bus/usb after mounting it.
I've tried to find the bug, but perhaps I'm wrong. This is
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 08:42:55PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Currently, in almost every PCI driver, if pci_request_regions() fails --
> indicating another driver is using the hardware -- then
> pci_disable_device() is called on the error path, disabling a device
> that another driver is usi
1 - 100 of 263 matches
Mail list logo
