On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Kurt Garloff wrote: > /* Condition for invocation of non-default security_op */ > #define COND_SECURITY(seop, def) \ > - (likely(security_ops == &capability_security_ops))? def: > security_ops->seop > + (unlikely(security_enabled))? security_ops->seop: def
So this will cause a false unlikely() for every single SELinux hook, again. This was rejected last year. The thread you pointed to has some discussion of dealing with the problematic ia64 case, although there's no evidence in these patches that anything has progressed in that area since then. - James -- James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
