On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Fabio Riccardi wrote:
> I'd like to announce the first release of X15 Alpha 1, a _user space_
> web server that is as fast as TUX.
great, the first TUX clone! ;-)
This should put the accusations to rest that Linux got the outstandingly
high SPECweb99 scores only because th
At 01:42 28/04/2001, Steffen Persvold wrote:
>I have a question regarding kernel threads : Are kernel threads treated
>equally in terms of scheduling as normal userlevel processes ??
I'm sure someone will correct me if I am wrong but I would think that
kernel threads are treated the same as the
Hi,
2.4.4 returns this error when compiling the buz module, the macro
MALLOC_MAXSIZE is missing:
[...]
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.4/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686
-DMODULE -c -o buz.o buz
At 09:32 28/04/2001, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>At 01:42 28/04/2001, Steffen Persvold wrote:
>>I have a question regarding kernel threads : Are kernel threads treated
>>equally in terms of scheduling as normal userlevel processes ??
>
>I'm sure someone will correct me if I am wrong but I would th
LA Walsh wrote:
> Rogier Wolff wrote:
>
> > > > On Linux any swap adds to the memory pool, so 1xRAM would be
> > > > equivalent to 2xRAM with the old old OS's.
> > >
> > > no more true AFAIK
> >
> > I've always been trying to convice people that 2x RAM remains a good
> > rule-of-thumb.
>
> ---
>
I have a high volume web site under linux :
kernel is 2.2.17
hardware is 5 bi-PIII 700Mhz / 512Mb, eepro100
all server are diskless (nfs on an netapp filer) except for tmp and swap
dispatch is done by the Resonate product
web server is apache+php (something like 400 processes), database
backend
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:27:30AM -0500, daniel sheltraw wrote:
> I have a busmaster question I am hoping you can help me with.
> If a PCI device is acting as a busmaster and the processor initiates a
> read/write to another device on the PCI bus while the busmater-device is in
> control of the
Martin Dalecki :
> tar/cpio and friends don't deal properly with
>
> a. holes inside of files.
> b. hardlinks between files.
>
??? GNU tar does both. The only thing it currently cannot handle is Not
Changing Anything: either atime or ctime _will_ be updated.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Fabio,
i noticed one weirdness in the Date-field handling of X15. X15 appears to
cache the Date field too, which is contrary to RFCs:
earth2:~> wget -s http://localhost/index.html -O - 2>/dev/null | grep Date
Date: Sat Apr 28 10:15:14 2001
earth2:~> date
Sat Apr 28 10:32:40 CEST 2001
ie. t
I have two almost identical computers with different graphic cards (ATI
RageII, Matrox G200). I'd like to have the framebuffer devices compiled
as modules, but then the kernel parameters from lilo (i.e. append =
"video=atyfb:800x600@72") doesn't work. Afterwards switching with fbset
works. It seem
watch the resonate heartbeat and see if it is getting lost in the network
traffic (the resonate logs will show missing heartbeat packets). think
seriously of setting the resonate stuff to run at a higher priority so
that it doesn't get behind.
depending on how high your network traffic is serious
Problem..
Playing mp3's under 2.4.4 (SMP) results in bursts of noise overlayed on top
of actual music being played.
Works fine running 2.4.3 (SMP)
System Information :-
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-6BXD
CPU(s) 2 x 400 MHz PII
RAM 128MB
Soundcard Creative AWE64-Gold
Network Card 3Com 3c905-B
SC
On Sat, Apr 28 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Linus Torvalds writes:
>
> > The buffer cache is "virtual" in the sense that /dev/hda is a
> > completely separate name-space from /dev/hda1, even if there
> > is some physical overlap.
>
> So the aliasing problems and elevator algorithm confusion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I didn't think we had union-mounting support... does it exist and
> I've somehow missed it?
I think you need Al Viro's namespace stuff for it to work properly.
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a messa
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 10:02:26PM -0400, Dan Maas wrote:
> > Are there any negative effects of editing include/asm/param.h to change
> > HZ from 100 to 1024? Or any other number? This has been suggested as a
> > way to improve the responsiveness of the GUI on a Linux system.
[...]
> Of course, t
Hi,
I am running a ~2GB reiserfs-3.5 partition, created
with SuSE's backport, since long with no problems.
However, when copied the harddisk to another which
has a newly-created 3.6 partition of 2.4.3-ac3,
it was not that stable. For example, deleted logfiles
re-appear sometimes, and apache/squid
hello. because i'm going to run lotus domino with large number of
concurrent users on linux, the kernel limits(of open file,processes,
inodes for the whole system,a single user and a process)is a key factor
to the performance. currently,the number of users cannot exceed 500 on 2.4.3.
i change the
Hi Xiong,
you can get a lot of books on kernel internals... But my experience says...
reading code is the best solutionall the intricacies can only be cleared
when u hack the code
btw a new "understanding the linux kernel" by O'reilly pub. can be helpful in
'code reading'.
Amol
I have noticed that 2.4.4 feels a lot less responsive than 2.4.3 under
fork load. This is caused by the "run child first after fork" patch. I
have tested on two different UP x86 systems running redhat 7.0.
For example, when running the gcc configure script, the X mouse pointer is
very jerky. The
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 03:16:34PM +0800, Xiong Zhao wrote:
> hello. i read linux kernel internal. are there other books/papers
> like that which dwell with linux kernel in detail,especially on
> process mechanism,for example,how pthread and fork are implemented,
> how clone actually work.are the
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 10:42:29AM +0200, you [Ingo Molnar] claimed:
>
> per RFC 2616:
> .
> The Date general-header field represents the date and time at which the
> message was originated, [...]
>
> Origin servers MUST include a Date header field in all responses, [...]
> .
Wakko Warner wrote:
> > I've always been trying to convice people that 2x RAM remains a good
> > rule-of-thumb.
>
> IMO this is pointless
>
> total used free sharedbuffers cached
> Mem:517456 505332 12124 111016 97752 236884
> -
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Ville Herva wrote:
> Uhh, perhaps I'm stupid, but why not cache the date field and update
> the field once a five seconds? Or even once a second?
yes, that should work. but that means possibly updating thousands of (or
more) cached headers, which has some overhead ...
> I
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Ville Herva wrote:
> Uhh, perhaps I'm stupid, but why not cache the date field and update
> the field once a five seconds? Or even once a second?
perhaps the best way would be to do this updating in the sending code
itself.
first there would be a 'current time thread', whi
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 03:24:25PM +0200, you [Ingo Molnar] claimed:
>
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Ville Herva wrote:
>
> > Uhh, perhaps I'm stupid, but why not cache the date field and update
> > the field once a five seconds? Or even once a second?
>
> perhaps the best way would be to do this upda
daniel sheltraw wrote:
> Hello kernel listees
>
> I have a busmaster question I am hoping you can help me with.
> If a PCI device is acting as a busmaster and the processor initiates a
> read/write to another device on the PCI bus while the busmater-device is in
> control of the bus what happens
> So you've spent almost $200 for RAM, and refuse to spend $4 for 1Gb of
> swap space. Fine with me.
I put this much ram into the system to keep from having swap. I still say
swap=2x ram is a stupid idea. I fail to see the logic in that. Disk is
much much slower than ram and if you're writing
> or such. tar/cpio and friends don't deal properly with
> a. holes inside of files.
> b. hardlinks between files.
GNU tar handles both of these. (Not particularly efficiently in the
case of sparse files, but that's a minor issue in this case.) See -S flag.
Perhaps more importantly, for a _robus
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Erik Mouw wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 03:16:34PM +0800, Xiong Zhao wrote:
> > hello. i read linux kernel internal. are there other books/papers
> > like that which dwell with linux kernel in detail,especially on
> > process mechanism,for example,how pthread and fork are
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 04:30:30PM +0300, Ville Herva wrote:
> Yes, that's vaguely resembles what I had in mind. Of course I had no idea
> about the data structures Tux or X15 use internally, so I couldn't think it
> too thoroughly.
You can also just use the cycle counter directly in most modern
Wakko Warner wrote:
> > So you've spent almost $200 for RAM, and refuse to spend $4 for 1Gb of
> > swap space. Fine with me.
> I put this much ram into the system to keep from having swap. I
> still say swap=2x ram is a stupid idea. I fail to see the logic in
> that. Disk is much much slower
On 04.28 Peter Osterlund wrote:
>
> Another thing is that the bash loop "while true ; do /bin/true ; done" is
> not possible to interrupt with ctrl-c.
>
Just tried that under 2.4.4 on two terminals at the same time and the system
even noticed it. Both cpus were running at about 45%user+55%sys,
With over 40 years of experience in the field of recycling, I
have put together one of the most valuable resources for the
entire recycling community.
http://recycler_1.tripod.com/recyclersguide/
Whether you are handling PLASTIC, METALS, WOOD, TEXTILES, TIRES,
ELECTRONICS, ETC., this is the s
Peter Osterlund wrote:
>
> I have noticed that 2.4.4 feels a lot less responsive than 2.4.3 under
> fork load. This is caused by the "run child first after fork" patch. I
> have tested on two different UP x86 systems running redhat 7.0.
>
> For example, when running the gcc configure script, the
On 04.28 Rogier Wolff wrote:
>
> I've ALWAYS said that it's a rule-of-thumb. This means that if you
> have a good argument to do it differently, you should surely do so!
>
I'm not so sure it's only a 'rule of thumb'. Do not know the state of
paging in just released 2.4.4, but in previuos kerne
Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> > Fine with me. Actually in _all_ cases execept cdrom.c it's preceded by
> > either sync_dev() or fsync_dev(). What do you think about pulling that
> > into the same function? Actually, that's what I've done in namespace
>
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> I think in the context you are inventig the proposed function,
> the drivers has allways an inode at hand. And contrary to what Linus
Read the patch. Almost all cases are of the "loop over partitions of foo"
kind.
> says, drivers not just know abo
I just got a Dane-Elec PhotoMate Combo SmartMedia/CompactFlash reader
manufactured by SCM Microsystems. It is a USB device with ID 04e6:0005.
The http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/ list of supported devices
calls this thing unsupported, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"I want this to work ! I'll help
dhcpcd stops working if I install 2.4.4. Replacing the 2.4.4 version of
8139too.c with the 2.4.3 version and leaving everything else exactly
the same gets things working again. Configuring the interface by hand
after dhcpcd has timed out also works. Has anyone else seen this?
ISC DHCP 2.0, ker
OK, I'm sending both variants (rediffed to 2.4.4). Take your pick.
Variant 1: invalidate_device(dev) (see below)
Variant 2: invalidate_device(dev, do_sync) (next posting; I've switched the
cases using sync_dev to fsync_dev, so do_sync is boolean)
diff -urN S4/drivers/acorn/block/mfmhd.c
S4-inva
... and here's the promised second variant
Al
diff -urN S4/drivers/acorn/block/mfmhd.c
S4-invalidate_device-2/drivers/acorn/block/mfmhd.c
--- S4/drivers/acorn/block/mfmhd.c Fri Feb 16 18:37:01 2001
+++ S4-invalidate_device-2/dr
Peter Osterlund wrote:
>
> Another thing is that the bash loop "while true ; do /bin/true ; done" is
> not possible to interrupt with ctrl-c.
Same thing here.
> A third thing I noticed is that starting a gnome session in redhat 7.0
> takes longer. (It takes more time for the gnome splas
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Michael F Gordon wrote:
> dhcpcd stops working if I install 2.4.4. Replacing the 2.4.4 version of
> 8139too.c with the 2.4.3 version and leaving everything else exactly
> the same gets things working again. Configuring the interface by hand
> after dhcpcd has timed out also
I too have this problem. The first time dhcpcd is executed it fails due
to timeout.
If we execute it again it works fine. Looks like the first packets
sent/received through the interface don't get treated right.
If I reverse the 2.4.4 patch to 2.4.3 it starts working well again.
Something's up w
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
> You can also just use the cycle counter directly in most modern CPUs.
> It can be read with a single instruction. In fact modern glibc will do
> it for you when you use clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, ...)
well, it's not reliable while using thin
>Peter Osterlund wrote:
>>
>> Another thing is that the bash loop "while true ; do /bin/true ; done" is
>> not possible to interrupt with ctrl-c.
>Same thing here.
I'm not having any problems. Just a quick question, is everyone who is
having a problem running with more than one cpu?
Jo
net/network.o: In function `init_or_cleanup':
net/network.o(.text+0x4a530): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_PC24 ip_nat_cleanup
says it all.
ip_nat_standalone.c:
static int init_or_cleanup(int init)
{
...
cleanup_nat:
ip_nat_cleanup();
...
}
ip_nat_core:
void __exit ip_nat_cleanup
Hello *,
I hope that this is the right place to document my problems:
After some changes in the bios settings and/or rebuilding the kernel
(I don't remember the exact chronology of this..) I get the following
kernel message when I try to mount a vfat partition (either ide/hdd
or a ZIP connected
I used Peanut Linux (debian based from ibiblio.org/peanut), and gcc 2.95.2 to compile
the 2.2.19 kernel I run now. No problems here.
--
home page:
http://members.fortunecity.com/fretburn1
AIM: GhiZzard
ICQ: 34778276
(When I'm on those things of course! :))
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Richard, can you add this URL to the FAQ ?
--- index.html.orig Sat Apr 28 18:03:32 2001
+++ index.html Sat Apr 28 18:04:41 2001
@@ -5570,8 +5570,9 @@
Contributing Contributions are welcome on
-this FAQ. These can be submitted by Email to Richard (see the Contr
I met follwing erros which was workarounded by put
define KMALLOC_MAXSIZE 131072
borrowed from af_unix.c of 2.4.3-ac14. But I'm convinced of this.
below lines were wrapped by me for readabilities' sake.
-D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.4/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-po
Hello,
I reported this before and the bug still exists in 2.4.4. The problem can
be circumvented by using drivers/scsi/sr.c from kernel 2.4.[01]. This
"fix" did not help just me, but somebody else I had contact with on the
net.
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
Kernel Panic and mount pr
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Peter Osterlund wrote:
>
> For example, when running the gcc configure script, the X mouse pointer is
> very jerky. The configure script itself runs approximately as fast as in
> 2.4.3.
Ok. Fair enough. The new "run the child first" approach has advantages,
but it is entire
On Sat, Apr 28 2001, Roman Fietze wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I reported this before and the bug still exists in 2.4.4. The problem can
> be circumvented by using drivers/scsi/sr.c from kernel 2.4.[01]. This
> "fix" did not help just me, but somebody else I had contact with on the
> net.
Is the CDROM on
John Kacur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Peter Osterlund wrote:
> >>
> >> Another thing is that the bash loop "while true ; do /bin/true ; done" is
> >> not possible to interrupt with ctrl-c.
>
> >Same thing here.
>
> I'm not having any problems. Just a quick question, is everyone who
Rogier Wolff writes:
> Wakko Warner wrote:
>>> So you've spent almost $200 for RAM, and refuse to spend
>>> $4 for 1Gb of swap space. Fine with me.
So that is a factor of 50 in price. It's what, a factor of 100
in access time?
> That disk space is just sitting there. Never to be used. I sp
I am now maitaining two versions of the directory indexing patch, one
for the "old-style" ext2 directory code and another based on Al Viro's
directory-in-page-cache patch, which hasn't made it into the main tree
yet. The current patches are:
http://kernelnewbies.org/~phillips/htree/dx.testme
Patch rediffed to 2.4.4, otherwise - no changes (2.4.4 has a
fix for ext2 race, but it's unrelated to the thing).
Patch is on ftp.math.psu.edu/pub/viro/ext2-dir-patch-S4.gz
Please, help with testing.
Al
-
To unsubscr
Hi,
I have several machines here, with either onboard aic7880 or with
AHA2940 (I don't recall) sitting on the PCI bus, which share the same
problem: they fail to detect the first disk (Id #0). The information
below is from lspci and /proc/scsi/scsi of Linux 2.2.19, in that order,
all Kernels have
Hi'all,
There seems to be something amiss with 2.4.4 wrt. memory management, which
leads to severe trashing under *light* load on my SMP box (Abit BP-6 with
Maciej's IO-APIC patch). I've had my box become almost unuseable twice within a
4-hour period now. One of those times it was running a compi
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 08:22:25PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> These have further devices (CD writer, CD-ROM drive), and these machines
> are 100% in 2.2.19. With 2.4.3 and 2.4.4-pre8, I get this problem
> (pencil & paper copy for Machine #2, DO NOT "grep"):
>
> AIC 7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HB
I had received info that this may have been fixed in 2.4.3-ac5. I
didn't get the chance to test it there, but I installed 2.4.4 this
morning. Alas, I receive exactly the same errors with 2.4.4 as I did
previously with 2.4.3.
One thing that did differ, though, shortly after I sent this first
ema
Howdy,
I've got an "Adaptec AHA-2940UW Pro Ultra SCSI host adapter" using
the aic7xxx driver (the new one, not the old one), and have had no
problems, I have a zip drive on ID5, and a 12X Smart & Friendly CD-RW on
ID6, haven't had any problems on 2.4.3-ac14, or 2.4.4, just an FYI.
I've had this network bug for the entire to 2.3 dev to 2.4 final and now even
in 2.4.4. Whenever I have high network traffic I get an ethernet transmit
timeout error by netdev watchdog. This is with a ne2k-pci network card, and
smp celeron machine. Reinstalling the module doesn't fix it, restar
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JA> On Sat, Apr 28 2001, Roman Fietze wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I reported this before and the bug still exists in 2.4.4. The problem can
>> be circumvented by using drivers/scsi/sr.c from kernel 2.4.[01]. This
>> "fix" d
Hi,
d_move() in fs/dcache.c is checking the kernel lock is held
(switch_names() does the same, but is only called from d_move()).
My question is why?
I can't see what it is using the kernel lock to sync/protect against.
Anyone out there know?
Thanks,
Mark
-
To unsubscribe from this li
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Mark Hemment wrote:
> Hi,
>
> d_move() in fs/dcache.c is checking the kernel lock is held
> (switch_names() does the same, but is only called from d_move()).
>
> My question is why?
> I can't see what it is using the kernel lock to sync/protect against.
Metric butt
> (on problems with ne2k-pci on SMP-systems)
Seems you're experiencing the effects of the infamous IO-APIC problem
('erratum' in Intel-lingo). There's a patch for these problems by Maciej W.
Rozycki, which should (IMnsHO) really be accepted into the main kernel tree
since many people are experien
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Reverting the fork patch makes all these problems go away on my machine.
>
> Reverting it outright may be an acceptable approach. I'll think about
> it: the arguments _for_ the patch are true and real, and it shows up as
> real improvements on some t
On Sat, Apr 28 2001, Jonathan Hudson wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> JA> On Sat, Apr 28 2001, Roman Fietze wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I reported this before and the bug still exists in 2.4.4. The problem can
> >> be circumvented by using
at the low end useing a bit of disk for swap doesn't hurt, I ran into a
case a couple years ago on AIX systems. we buy them with 2G ram so that we
don't need to swap, but discovered (the hard way) that we also needed to
allocate 4G of disk space for those boxes (allocating less then 2G meant
that
linux-2.4.4 changes one line in drivers/scsi/pci2220i.c that
used to call scsi_set_pci_device to call the undefined routine
scsi_set_pci_info. That is the only change to pci2220i.c in linux-2.4.4.
I don't know what the intention of this change was. Perhaps a renaming
of scsi_set_pci_devi
linux-2.4.4/drivers/video/Config.in allowed the user to select
some Atari and SuperH architecture video drivers that would not compile
on other architectures. This patch causes those drivers to be offered
only on architectures on which they will compile.
By the way, this patch i
what sort of switch are you plugged into? some Cisco switches have a
'feature' that ignores all traffic from a port for X seconds after a
machine is plugged in / powered on on a port (they claim somehting about
preventing loops) it may be that the new kernel now boots up faster then
the old one so
Hi,
>I met follwing erros which was workarounded by put
>define KMALLOC_MAXSIZE 131072
>borrowed from af_unix.c of 2.4.3-ac14. But I'm convinced of
>this.
>below lines were wrapped by me for readabilities' sake.
my fix in an earlier e-mail to the list explained that the
proper way of fixing it i
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 05:52:42PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > You can also just use the cycle counter directly in most modern CPUs.
> > It can be read with a single instruction. In fact modern glibc will do
> > it for you when you use clock_gettime
Peter Osterlund wrote:
>
> I have noticed that 2.4.4 feels a lot less responsive than 2.4.3 under
> fork load. This is caused by the "run child first after fork" patch. I
> have tested on two different UP x86 systems running redhat 7.0.
>
> For example, when running the gcc configure script, the
Is there a way (kernel or userspace... doesn't matter) that gdb/ddd
could be invoked when a program is about
to dump core, or perhaps on a certain signal (that the app could deliver
to itself when required). The latter case
is what I need right now, as I have to debug an app that breaks
seemingly
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> Kai, can you try this patch out? I think it does the right
> thing. What I'm mostly interested in is if your ipchains
> setup works for the resulting kernel, I've already checked
> that it links properly. :-)
I'm not Kai, but I also reported simila
Tony Hoyle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Is there a way that gdb/ddd could be invoked when a program is about
> to dump core...?
Yes, I use that to get a symbolic stack dump after a crash,
although I find that the gdb so invoked doesn't accept interactive
commands, and I have to use 'kill -9' af
On 28-Apr-2001 Tony Hoyle wrote:
> Is there a way (kernel or userspace... doesn't matter) that gdb/ddd
> could be invoked when a program is about
> to dump core, or perhaps on a certain signal (that the app could deliver
> to itself when required). The latter case
> is what I need right now, as
David Lang wrote:
>
> watch the resonate heartbeat and see if it is getting lost in the network
> traffic (the resonate logs will show missing heartbeat packets). think
> seriously of setting the resonate stuff to run at a higher priority so
> that it doesn't get behind.
>
> depending on how hig
On 28 Apr 2001 13:44:48 -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> Sorry but why don't You run Your application with gdb ?
> Once Your program crashes You'll get the prompt and You'll be able to
> stack-trace and watching whatever You need.
> The solution I use to be able to get inside the program even when t
On 28-Apr-2001 Tony Hoyle wrote:
> On 28 Apr 2001 13:44:48 -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>> Sorry but why don't You run Your application with gdb ?
>> Once Your program crashes You'll get the prompt and You'll be able to
>> stack-trace and watching whatever You need.
>> The solution I use to be ab
To recap: running Panasonic LF-D101 DVDRAM drive on SCSI (AHA2740) and
getting segfaults. On-disk format is UDF2.0, as 2.1 won't mount.
Mount, ls, umount, mount, ls, umount, etc - no problem.
Mount, cp <20Mfile>, umount, mount, ls, (20Mfile), umount, mount, ls, (20Mfile),
rpm -q 20Mfile, umount
Looking for the best way to give all users a common desktop, which comes from one
source (for easy administration).
Found copying my /root/.gnome & .sawfish directories to a user home breaks the user's
GUI, implying a symlink wouldn't work. I am told .gnome & .sawfish can be copied to
/etc/sk
I'm also seeing what would appear to be exactly this.
The problem, for me, doesn't occur when I write directly to /dev/dsp
(i.e., use the OSS output plugin for xmms). The problem only occurs
with esd.
It would appear that something in the kernel broke esd.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 10:50:01AM +0
...and inocent one, but please apply, anyway.
Pavel
Index: slab.h
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/Repository/linux/include/linux/slab.h,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.2
diff -u -u -r1.1.1
Hi Alan,
Over the last week I've tried to upgrade a 4-CPU Xeon box to 2.2.19, but
the it keeps locking up whenever the disks are stresses a bit, e.g. when
updatedb is running. I get the following messages on the console:
wait_on_bh, CPU 1:
irq: 1 [1 0]
bh: 1 [1 0]
<[8010af71]>
over and ove
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 02:07:53PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Why would ip_nat_cleanup() be removed by the linker?
Because we explicitly tell the linker to drop all code marked as
__exit:
#define __exit __attribute__ ((unused, __section__(".text.exit")))
>From x86 vmlinux.lds:
Russell King writes:
> ip_nat_standalone.c:
>
> static int init_or_cleanup(int init)
> {
> ...
> cleanup_nat:
> ip_nat_cleanup();
> ...
> }
Call ip_nat_cleanup();
> ip_nat_core:
>
> void __exit ip_nat_cleanup(void)
> {
> ip_ct_selective_cleanup(&clean_nat, NULL)
Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> So that is a factor of 50 in price. It's what, a factor of 100
> in access time?
Actually it's only about 10.
> > That disk space is just sitting there. Never to be used. I spent $400
> > on the RAM, and I'm now reserving about $8 worth of disk space for
> > s
Hmmm... this is the kernel list... not only the wrong place to ask UI
questions, but lots of people here don't even like UIs. :)
http://www.gnome.org
-M
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 2:13 PM
Subject: Common GUI Conf
David Lang wrote:
> at the low end useing a bit of disk for swap doesn't hurt, I ran into a
> case a couple years ago on AIX systems. we buy them with 2G ram so that we
> don't need to swap, but discovered (the hard way) that we also needed to
> allocate 4G of disk space for those boxes (allocatin
Hi!
Quite many changes went to nbd in 2.4.4, but no change to initial
comment with version/copyrights. Would author please credit himself?
Pavel
--
I'm [EMAIL PROTECTED] "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos
Thus spake Steven Walter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm also seeing what would appear to be exactly this.
>
> The problem, for me, doesn't occur when I write directly to /dev/dsp
> (i.e., use the OSS output plugin for xmms). The problem only occurs
> with esd.
>
> It would appear that something in
--- linux-2.4.4/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c~ Sat Apr 28 21:43:38 2001
+++ linux-2.4.4/drivers/parport/parport_pc.cSat Apr 28 22:37:29 2001
@@ -2576,7 +2576,7 @@
}
#else
static struct pci_driver parport_pc_pci_driver;
-static int __init parport_pc_init_superio(void) {return 0;}
+static
Hi all,
I was unable to find out who the maintainers of those three framebuffer
drivers are (Amiga, Atari, Mach64) and therefore I'm asking here on lkml.
All three of the drivers define a function named strtoke for their private
use which does almost the same as strsep (that in turn lives in
lib
> questions, but lots of people here don't even like UIs. :)
... except make menuconfig. I prefer DOS 3.3 over any Windoze/KDE out
there :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.k
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 11:29:15AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> what sort of switch are you plugged into? some Cisco switches have a
> 'feature' that ignores all traffic from a port for X seconds after a
> machine is plugged in / powered on on a port (they claim somehting about
> preventing loops) i
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo