SCSI scanning

2000-09-16 Thread Jan Niehusmann
test9-pre1 does not contain a fix for the test8 scsi scanning problem. SCSI disks are detected twice if scsi is not compiled as a module. Torben already posted a patch. Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ple

pcmcia fixes for apple powerbook

2000-09-16 Thread Paul Mackerras
David, The patch below fixes some problems I found in trying to use the in-kernel pcmcia/cardbus support in 2.4.0-test8 on my 1999 G3 powerbook, which has a TI 1211 cardbus controller. The first part of the patch fixes a simple endianness problem in cs.c. Following that is a small change that re

[patch-2.4.0-test9-pre1] mm/filemap.c

2000-09-16 Thread Bill Wendling
Hi Linus, Here's a resubmitted small optimization for the mm/filemap.c file. - The `curr = curr->next;' statement doesn't need to be executed if the repeat is taken. I used the list_for_each() macro to accomodate this better. Share and enjoy! -- || B

Re: Yet another report on the dquot oops

2000-09-16 Thread David Ford
J Sloan wrote: > David Ford wrote: > > > Did you apply the quota patch that was posted this week? > > Yes, thanx for the sanity check - > > After the oops, I remembered something about a patch, > and there was indeed one posted by Herr Diehl. > > Will check that out - now I'm curious if there's s

Re: New topic (PowerPC Linux PCI HELL)

2000-09-16 Thread Gérard Roudier
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, [ISO-8859-1] Gérard Roudier wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Gérard Roudier wrote: > > > > > [ ... ] > > > No ifs, why's or buts. A driver that just enable

Re: test9-pre1

2000-09-16 Thread bert hubert
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 07:03:36PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Ok, the new MM balancing has been getting good reviews, and no longer has > any known issues. Integrated. We'd have needed to do it sooner or later > anyway (just see what happened in 2.2.x), the sooner we do it the less > trauma

Re: test9-pre1

2000-09-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, bert hubert wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 07:03:36PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Ok, the new MM balancing has been getting good reviews, and no longer has > > any known issues. Integrated. We'd have needed to do it sooner or later > > anyway (just see what happene

pcmcia fixes for apple powerbook

2000-09-16 Thread Paul Mackerras
David, The patch below fixes some problems I found in trying to use the in-kernel pcmcia/cardbus support in 2.4.0-test9-pre1 on my 1999 G3 powerbook, which has a TI 1211 cardbus controller. The first part of the patch fixes a simple endianness problem in cs.c. Following that is a small change th

TODO list for new VM

2000-09-16 Thread Rik van Riel
Hi, Here is the TODO list for the new VM. The only thing really needed for 2.4 is the OOM handler and the page->mapping->flush() callback is really wanted by the journaling filesystem folks. The rest are mostly extra's that would be nice; these things won't be pushed for inclusion except if it t

Re: RAID HW Questions...

2000-09-16 Thread Alan Cox
> Well. Since DPT rammed me in the ass with their "SmartRAID V" RAID I need > to buy a new RAID card. I don't know who to trust. I was told (about 1 > year ago) that DPT was the Co. that liked/worked with the linux community. > Obviously they don't. I don't a driver for over $12,000 in RAID HW. So

test9-pre1 breaks pcmcia (or PCI?)

2000-09-16 Thread Tigran Aivazian
Hi Martin, I have finally got around to testing your pci.c fix against 2.4.0-test9-pre1. The results are: a) without your fix I see neither the cardbus eth nic nor the ones behined the DEC pci-pci bridge. (I did see the cardbus nic on test8 though) b) with your fix I see all devices behind the

Re: RAID HW Questions...

2000-09-16 Thread Bryan Whitehead
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > Well. Since DPT rammed me in the ass with their "SmartRAID V" RAID I need > > to buy a new RAID card. I don't know who to trust. I was told (about 1 > > year ago) that DPT was the Co. that liked/worked with the linux community. > > Obviously they don't. I

Attempting to mount Zip causes floppy access (2.2.16)

2000-09-16 Thread Nick Holloway
I have a zip disk which I attempted to mount using the following fstab entry: /dev/sda4 /zip vfat noauto,nodev,nosuid,user This caused a spew of "bread failed" errors, and the mount process ended up blocked in "wait_on_buffer". I thought at first that Zip disk had gone to silicon heaven. A

Re: usb-uhci forgets to destroy kmem entries

2000-09-16 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 10:04:59PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > +#ifdef DEBUG_SLAB > > + if (retval < 0 ) { > > + if(kmem_cache_destroy(uhci_desc_kmem)) > Why only #ifdef DEBUG_SLAB? > AFAICS the driver should always destroy it's slab cache. Because we have such constr

An elevator algorithm

2000-09-16 Thread Xuan Baldauf
Hello, I'm not a kernel hacker (and therefore I'm not familiar with the kernel terminology), and maybe this idea is already old, but here is an algorithm for an elevator which tries to guarantee smoothness and no stalling: Every rw-request gets an expiry timeout (e.g. in jiffies) where it's comp

Re: RAID HW Questions...

2000-09-16 Thread Alan Cox
> kernel from RH (the only kernels they support according to the web page). > I need to have at LEAST 2.2.16 for security resons. But they don't give a > crap. Someone posted the 2.2.16port of their driver URL to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > If Linux can get the card working with they native i2o drivers

2.4.0-test8 tried to kill init!

2000-09-16 Thread Harley Anderson
I was just sitting here reading a page in lynx that I grabbed yesterday and got spammed by 2 or 3 oopsies.. The machine had been up for approximately 44 hours with fairly light load. Only caught the bottom of the 1st or second one but it had kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:194! at the bottom. The n

Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK

2000-09-16 Thread Matthias Andree
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, D. J. Bernstein wrote: > O_NONBLOCK is not an fd property. It is an ofile property. Two different > fds created by dup() will point to the same O_NONBLOCK bit. Who says that accept() is to use dup()? There is a difference in "new file descriptor" (what accept returns) and "

Re: No Bug: accept discards socket options/O_NONBLOCK

2000-09-16 Thread Matthias Andree
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Michael Poole wrote: > Most of the programs called by inetd don't expect non-blocking I/O on > their stdin and stdout, which they would suddenly get if accept()'ed > sockets inherited the non-blocking nature of inetd's listening socket. Looking at nkit 0.4.2, I cannot see a

Linux 2.2.18pre9

2000-09-16 Thread Alan Cox
Resynchronize the USB stuff and starting bringing the ARM into line 2.2.18pre9 o Fix usb module load oops(Thomas Sailer) o Bring USB boot drivers in line with 2.4t8 (Greg Kroah-Hartman) o And USB print drivers (Greg Kroah-

Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

2000-09-16 Thread Jamie Lokier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Sure the global system is slower. But the "interactive feel" is faster. > > Let's pop up little buttons to make it "feel" faster. If little buttons pop up quickly when I click on them, then yes that's better interactive feel. Sometimes the disk is involved in this.

CONFIG_VIDEO_BT848 in 2.4.0-test9pre1 missing

2000-09-16 Thread Dietmar Kling
Hi, Is there any reason that the CONFIG_VIDEO_BT848 is missing in menuconfig? (doesn't show up in .config either) I added it manually in .config and the bttv drivers seem to compile Regards Dietmar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a mes

Re: (reiserfs) An elevator algorithm

2000-09-16 Thread Ragnar Kjørstad
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 01:17:53PM +0200, Xuan Baldauf wrote: > I'm not a kernel hacker (and therefore I'm not familiar with the kernel > terminology), and maybe this idea is already old, but here is an > algorithm for an elevator which tries to guarantee smoothness and no > stalling: > > Every r

[PATCH] Fix floppy ioctl (which were broken in 2.4.0-test5)

2000-09-16 Thread Alain Knaff
The following patch (against 2.4.0-test8) restores ioctl functionality, which has been broken in 2.4.0-test6-pre7: --- 2.4.0-test8/linux/drivers/block/floppy.cMon Sep 11 20:09:28 2000 +++ linux/drivers/block/floppy.cSat Sep 16 15:03:39 2000 @@ -3435,6 +3435,8 @@ static int fd_ioctl(s

attempt to access beyond end of device

2000-09-16 Thread Stephen E. Clark
Help. I am getting the above error when trying to build an Oracle Database. I have tried 2.2.14 and 2.2.18pre8 with the same results. I am putting the DB on /usr8 which from the df -m command should have plenty of room. Is this a kernel problem or a problem on my part? Below is part of my /var

Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy ioctl (which were broken in 2.4.0-test5)

2000-09-16 Thread Tigran Aivazian
Alain, Al Viro, myself and Linus broke this intentionally. Please read the comments we put in blkdev_get() in fs/block_dev.c and understand that this is a non-trivial issue - we had an interesting conversation about it - unfortunately all my mailfolders are gone (as a side-effect of truncate issu

Re: bug in blkdev <-> VFS interaction. (oops) (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Tigran Aivazian
FYI, here is a chunk of our conversation - I just realized that most of it was private with AV and Linus so it is reasonable that you didn't see it. Regards, Tigran -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 22:45:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Lin

Re: 2.4.0-test8 tried to kill init!

2000-09-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Harley Anderson wrote: > I was just sitting here reading a page in lynx that I grabbed yesterday and got > spammed by 2 or 3 oopsies.. > The machine had been up for approximately 44 hours with fairly light load. > Only caught the bottom of the 1st or second one but it had >

Re: PROBLEM: Segmentation fault [SIGSEGV] reading from /proc/tty/driver/serial

2000-09-16 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, David Ciemiewicz wrote: > [4.] Linux version 2.2.14-5.0 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version Don't report bugs with this old version. [root@base igmar]# uname -a Linux base.jdimedia.nl 2.2.17acl #2 Mon Sep 11 02:23:03 CEST 2000 i586 unknown [root@base igmar]# cat /proc/tty/dri

No Subject

2000-09-16 Thread Terence Ang
Dear All, Could anyone kindly tell me how to setup software RAID1 on IDE drives under RedHat 6.2? I have got one extra PCI IDE card with 2 hard disks (not mentioning the existing Linux OS hard disk) It seemed that the card could not be detected under Linux. Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this

Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy ioctl (which were broken in 2.4.0-test5)

2000-09-16 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: > The following patch (against 2.4.0-test8) restores ioctl functionality, > which has been broken in 2.4.0-test6-pre7: I would reserve "broken" for original state. What's wrong with "if you want write permissions to be checked during open() - open the bl

Re: bug in blkdev <-> VFS interaction. (oops) (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Alain Knaff
>FYI, here is a chunk of our conversation - I just realized that most of it >was private with AV and Linus so it is reasonable that you didn't see it. Thanks for mailing me this. Well, I would have actually preferred to take part in this discussion when it first took place, rather than learning a

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-16 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Sep 15, Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I tried doing that for Andrea but I think it's not useful, active is >> mmapped and strace shows nothing interesting. >mmapped... Does mmap() go past the end of file? I asked INN developers and they think it should not. The file size is f

VM comparison

2000-09-16 Thread James Lewis Nance
Hello All, I am interested in Rik's new VM system so I am running some "How long does it take to build mozilla" benchmarks. I only have results for 2.2.17 and 2.4.0-test9-pre1 right now, but the results look very good and I wanted to share them: bessie> cat 2.2.17/time.* 4086.110u 54

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre9

2000-09-16 Thread Matthias Andree
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > Resynchronize the USB stuff and starting bringing the ARM into line > > 2.2.18pre9 > o NFSv3 support and NFS updates (Trond Myklebust and co) Great. Will test. -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub

Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy ioctl (which were broken in 2.4.0-test5)

2000-09-16 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 03:26:33PM +0200, Alain Knaff wrote: > The following patch (against 2.4.0-test8) restores ioctl functionality, > which has been broken in 2.4.0-test6-pre7: > + /* Allow ioctls if we have write-permissions even if read-only open. > + * Needed so that programs suc

Re: 2.4.0-test8 tried to kill init! (addendum)

2000-09-16 Thread Harley Anderson
> This sounds like either some bit errors in memory > (memtest86 will find those), or a device driver > scribbling over memory, or the memory not being > refreshed or operated at the right speed (memory > to slow for the speed you're running it at?)... Hmm, Andrew just informed me that the rtl813

Ooops with 2.2.17

2000-09-16 Thread Jens Hoffrichter
Hi, On my Server just happenend a Kernel-Ooops, and afterwards some programs crashed, e.g. "w" crashed with a Segmentation fault and "ps" crashed with a Signal 11. Recently I encountered Oopse on a regularly basis, but after upgrading to 2.2.17, everything seemed to be alright, but now, 3 days

2.2.18pre7 [OOPS] + [PATCH]

2000-09-16 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
>From kufel!ankry Fri Sep 15 23:04:36 2000 Return-Path: Received: from kufel.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by green.mif.pg.gda.pl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id XAA15722 for green.mif.pg.gda.pl!ankry; Fri, 15 Sep 2000 23:04:36 +0200 Received: (from ankry@localhost) by kufel.dom (8.9.

Re: bug in blkdev <-> VFS interaction. (oops) (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: > >FYI, here is a chunk of our conversation - I just realized that most of it > >was private with AV and Linus so it is reasonable that you didn't see it. > > Thanks for mailing me this. Well, I would have actually preferred to > take part in this discus

ISAPnP + Soundblaster doesn't work without 'multiple=0'

2000-09-16 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi folks, According to Documentation/sound/Soundblaster I have to report that I had to set the option 'multiple=0' to make my Soundblaster16 work. Without this option I get the following message at boot time: : : Soundblaster audio driver Copyright (C) by Hannu Savolainen 1993-1996 SB 4.13 detec

Re: Preallocated skb's?

2000-09-16 Thread jamal
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Bogdan Costescu wrote: > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, jamal wrote: > > > Only the timer runs at HZ granularity ;-< > > Some cards provide their own high resolution timers; latest 3Com cards > provide several with different purposes (none currently used). The > question is how man

Re: bug in blkdev <-> VFS interaction. (oops) (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: > Ok, now could you tell me a way how to easily detect a "fake inode", > and I rewrite my "restore ioctl functionality patch" in a way as not > to break floppy root mounts. s/root// fake means NULL ->i_sb, nothing fancy about that. IS_RDONLY() used to b

Re: attempt to access beyond end of device

2000-09-16 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 09:35:46AM -0400, Stephen E. Clark wrote: > How do I relate dev 08:02 to my actual physical devices. I have 2 ide > drives and 3 scsi drives. dev 08:02 is /dev/sda2, your swap device. > Sep 15 19:01:55 joker kernel: Adding Swap: 66020k swap-space (priority > -1) > Sep 1

Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee

2000-09-16 Thread Trond Myklebust
> " " == Michael Eisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Focus on correctness and do the expedient thing first, which > is: > - The first time a file is locked, flush dirty pages > to the server, and then invalidate the page cache This would be implemented with the

Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest

2000-09-16 Thread Dietmar Kling
hi, i thought i add a report to the new VM in 2.4.0pre9 My Machine has 256 MB of memory I left it for two hours ( several Netscapes -Instances, Mail and xmms running _nothing in swap_ ) When I tried to restart my work after 2 hours, the machine started swapping madly. I couldn't run the Netsc

Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest

2000-09-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Dietmar Kling wrote: > i thought i add a report to the new VM in 2.4.0pre9 > > My Machine has 256 MB of memory > I left it for two hours ( several Netscapes -Instances, > Mail and xmms running _nothing in swap_ ) > > When I tried to restart my work after 2 hours, > the mac

02 Quantum lct08 & Promise Ultra66

2000-09-16 Thread Mike
- Original Message - From: Theodore Y. Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 10:30 PM Subject: Re: Quantum lct08 & Promise Ultra66 > Can you send your bug report again with the exact error message? One of > the m

Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest

2000-09-16 Thread Trever Adams
Rik van Riel wrote: > > I believe this is a tuning issue, so > > i do not complain :) > > Indeed. Now that the testing base for the VM patch > has increased so much, there are a few as-of-yet > untested workloads popping up that don't perform > very well. > > I'm gathering details about those wo

Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm

2000-09-16 Thread Xuan Baldauf
"Ragnar Kjørstad" wrote: > On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 01:17:53PM +0200, Xuan Baldauf wrote: > > I'm not a kernel hacker (and therefore I'm not familiar with the kernel > > terminology), and maybe this idea is already old, but here is an > > algorithm for an elevator which tries to guarantee smooth

Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee

2000-09-16 Thread Michael Eisler
> > " " == Michael Eisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Focus on correctness and do the expedient thing first, which > > is: > > - The first time a file is locked, flush dirty pages > >to the server, and then invalidate the page cache > > This would be

Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest

2000-09-16 Thread Byron Stanoszek
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Dietmar Kling wrote: > > > i thought i add a report to the new VM in 2.4.0pre9 > > > > My Machine has 256 MB of memory > > I left it for two hours ( several Netscapes -Instances, > > Mail and xmms running _nothing in swap_ ) > >

[Fwd: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest]

2000-09-16 Thread safemode
Trever Adams wrote: > Rik van Riel wrote: > > > I believe this is a tuning issue, so > > > i do not complain :) > > > > Indeed. Now that the testing base for the VM patch > > has increased so much, there are a few as-of-yet > > untested workloads popping up that don't perform > > very well. >

Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest

2000-09-16 Thread Byron Stanoszek
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > I think I might have a similar problem with 2.4.0-t8-vmpatch2, related to > caching. Without the vmpatch, my standard system 'used' would be near 28mb > actual in use, the rest cached or in buffers. When I tried vmpatch2, standard > usage eventually g

Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest

2000-09-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Dietmar Kling wrote: > > > > > i thought i add a report to the new VM in 2.4.0pre9 > > > When I tried to restart my work after 2 hours, > > > the machine started swapping madly. > > >

test9-pre1 hang when loading scsi-ide cdrom

2000-09-16 Thread Frank van de Pol
Just experienced a (reproducable) hang of the system when loading the drivers for my cdrom drives. (ide-cd and ide-scsi). System freezes completely; interupts / alt-sysreq is still working. Just before the lockup I get next message on my console: " scsi1 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE AT

sisfb compile error (2.4.0-test8)

2000-09-16 Thread komur
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i686 -fno-strict-aliasing -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include /usr/src/linux/include/linux/modversions.h -c -o sisfb.o sisfb.c sisfb.c: In function `get_modeID_length': sisfb.c:1443: warning

Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest

2000-09-16 Thread Byron Stanoszek
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > OTOH, maybe we want to do /some/ background swapping of > sleeping tasks, to smooth out the VM a bit at the point > where we start to run into the situation where we need > to swap something out... This is something like what the previous VM did, and it

machine check handler

2000-09-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
This patch fixes two little bugs in the IA32 machine check handler, it's against 2.2.17pre7. The first bug is that the MC0_MISC is at address 403H, the second is that wmb() as implemented in IA32 doesn't serialize, a lock on the bus as given from mb() will serialize instead. --- 2.2.18pre7/arch/

Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest

2000-09-16 Thread Byron Stanoszek
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > I'd like to be able to use that extra 16mb for process memory more than I would > for cache. When most of my programs get loaded up, it totals to around 24mb on > average, and medium-to-low disk access is used. I like the way it is now, where > it won

Re: bug in blkdev <-> VFS interaction. (oops) (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Alain Knaff
> > >On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: > >> >FYI, here is a chunk of our conversation - I just realized that most of it >> >was private with AV and Linus so it is reasonable that you didn't see it. >> >> Thanks for mailing me this. Well, I would have actually preferred to >> take part in th

Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy ioctl (which were broken in 2.4.0-test5)

2000-09-16 Thread Alain Knaff
> > >On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: > >> The following patch (against 2.4.0-test8) restores ioctl functionality, >> which has been broken in 2.4.0-test6-pre7: > >I would reserve "broken" for original state. What's wrong with "if you >want write permissions to be checked during open() - op

Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest

2000-09-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > Active pages increased to 18688kB, and we see some inact_clean. > Is this normal as intended? Yes. There are 2 things going on during that find. 1) find touches buffers all over the place, those buffers will be added to the active list 2) kflushd

Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest

2000-09-16 Thread Byron Stanoszek
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > It would be better to put that in a userspace tool like > vmstat. Or modify 'free', which is what I was going to do. How would I find the number of actual pages-in-use from those variables? I've tried adding and subtracting several and can't seem to get

Re: CONFIG_VIDEO_BT848 in 2.4.0-test9pre1 missing

2000-09-16 Thread Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Hi Dietmar, First go to 'General Setup' and make sure that 'PCI support' is turned on. Then go to 'Character Devices' -> 'I2C support'. Turn on both 'I2C support' and 'I2C bit-banging interfaces'. Then go to 'Multimedia devices'. Turn on 'Video for Linux' and enter the 'Video for Linux' subme

Re: sisfb compile error (2.4.0-test8)

2000-09-16 Thread Hayden James
--- sisfb.c.origSat Sep 16 14:43:19 2000 +++ sisfb.c Sat Sep 16 14:43:28 2000 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ #define EXPORT_SYMTAB #undef SISFBDEBUG -#undef CONFIG_FB_SIS_LINUXBIOS +#define CONFIG_FB_SIS_LINUXBIOS #include #include This patch will make it compile...I don't know if its r

Re: bug in blkdev <-> VFS interaction. (oops) (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: > >Flush > > What is so shocking about flushing away the cache for a > write-protected floppy? Erm... The fact that final close() will do it anyway? Oh, and the fact that we have a generic ioctl() doing the same. > > and format on write-protected flopp

Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest

2000-09-16 Thread Byron Stanoszek
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > MemFree: memory on the freelist, contains no data > Buffers: buffer cache memory > Cached: page cache memory > > Active: buffer or page cache memory which is in active > use (that is, page->age > 0 or many references)

Re: [PATCH] Fix floppy ioctl (which were broken in 2.4.0-test5)

2000-09-16 Thread Alain Knaff
> > >On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: >> >> The following patch (against 2.4.0-test8) restores ioctl functionality, >> which has been broken in 2.4.0-test6-pre7: > >No. Th epatch breaks things. You cannot use "permission" at that point, >and the code was removed on purpose before. Nobody co

Re: bug in blkdev <-> VFS interaction. (oops) (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: > >Probably the clean solution would be to add a character device per > >controller (/dev/fdc), turning eject /dev/fd0 into > >% echo eject 0 > /dev/fdc0 > > Why do that for floppies, when we still eject CD-Roms, Zips, "the > old-fashioned way" with ioct

Re: bug in blkdev <-> VFS interaction. (oops) (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Alain Knaff
> > >On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: > >> >Probably the clean solution would be to add a character device per >> >controller (/dev/fdc), turning eject /dev/fd0 into >> >% echo eject 0 > /dev/fdc0 >> >> Why do that for floppies, when we still eject CD-Roms, Zips, "the >> old-fashioned way"

Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest

2000-09-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > MemFree: memory on the freelist, contains no data > > Buffers: buffer cache memory > > Cached: page cache memory > > > > Active: buffer or page cache memory which is in active > >

Re: bug in blkdev <-> VFS interaction. (oops) (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Alain Knaff
> > >On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: > >> Moreover you seem to have an interesting definition of "most": for >> many of those ioctls, sysctl would be rather clumsy: FDRAWCMD, >> FDSETPRM, FDCLRPRM, FDDEFPRM, FDFMTBEG, FDFMTTRK, FDFMTEND, FDFLUSH, >> FDRESET, FDTWADDLE, FDEJECT. Or do you r

Re: bug in blkdev <-> VFS interaction. (oops) (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Alain Knaff
> > >On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: > >> Ok, now could you tell me a way how to easily detect a "fake inode", >> and I rewrite my "restore ioctl functionality patch" in a way as not >> to break floppy root mounts. > >s/root// > >fake means NULL ->i_sb, nothing fancy about that. IS_RDONLY(

Re: bug in blkdev <-> VFS interaction. (oops) (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: > Moreover you seem to have an interesting definition of "most": for > many of those ioctls, sysctl would be rather clumsy: FDRAWCMD, > FDSETPRM, FDCLRPRM, FDDEFPRM, FDFMTBEG, FDFMTTRK, FDFMTEND, FDFLUSH, > FDRESET, FDTWADDLE, FDEJECT. Or do you really me

[PATCH] Fix floppy ioctls, REVISED edition

2000-09-16 Thread Alain Knaff
The following patch (against 2.4.0-test8) restores floppy ioctl functionality, which has been broken in 2.4.0-test6-pre7. It now tests for fake ioctl's, so their should be no interaction with read-only mounts: --- 2.4.0-test8/linux/drivers/block/floppy.cMon Sep 11 20:09:28 2000 +++ linux/driv

Re: RAID HW Questions...

2000-09-16 Thread Ricky Beam
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Bryan Whitehead wrote: >> The driver should be on DPT's site. Im not sure on the current state with the (The driver _IS_ on DPT's site. It always has been.) >The driver directory is on thier web site. true. But it only works for >specific versions of kernel's from RH. They

insmod failure in kernel-2.2.14

2000-09-16 Thread aprasad
i am using kernel-2.2.14-5.0, i wrote a simple module to just printk a a message and tried to insmod it, but it gave error message: resource/device busy (EBUSY) but the message gets printed in /var/log/messages the code is: -- #define MODULE #includ

Re: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest

2000-09-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > > > I'd like to be able to use that extra 16mb for process memory more than I would > > for cache. When most of my programs get loaded up, it totals to around 24mb on > > average, and medium-to-low disk ac

Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee

2000-09-16 Thread Trond Myklebust
> " " == Michael Eisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not a Linux kernel literate. However, I found your > assertion surprising. Does procfs do page i/o as well? No. It has its own setup. > file.c in fs/nfs suggests that the Linux VFS has non-page > interfaces in add

Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock() does not provide coherency guarantee

2000-09-16 Thread Alan Cox
> I'm not a Linux kernel literate. However, I found your > assertion surprising. Does procfs do page i/o as well? No. An fs isnt required to use the page caches at all. It makes life a lot saner to do so - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a m

folk: no more resource available

2000-09-16 Thread octave klaba
Hi, Running on 2.2.17 / raid-soft (piii600/512ram) I have the problems with the number of process. When ps auxw | wc -l is more than 500 process no command works and all I get is folk: no more resource available. How can I run more that 500 process ? is there any /proc to change or is the hard li

Re: bug in blkdev <-> VFS interaction. (oops) (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: > >You know, I have nothing against having it that way for CDs and Zips. > >And you have an interesting idea of old-fashioned - I'ld say that > >echo(1) was in place way before ioctl(2)... > > You're right, echo is indeed older than ioctl. However, ioct

[PATCH 2.4.0.9.1] Re: sisfb compile error (2.4.0-test8)

2000-09-16 Thread Jeff Garzik
This patch should fix sisfb the right way... You don't want to define ...LINUXBIOS for normal situations.. Jeff -- Jeff Garzik | Would you *really* want to Building 1024| get on a non-stop flight? MandrakeSoft, Inc. | -- George Carlin Index: driv

Re: folk: no more resource available

2000-09-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, octave klaba wrote: > Running on 2.2.17 / raid-soft (piii600/512ram) I have the > problems with the number of process. When ps auxw | wc -l > is more than 500 process no command works and all I get is > folk: no more resource available. > > How can I run more that 500 proces

Re: NFS locking bug -- limited mtime resolution means nfs_lock()does not provide coherency guarantee

2000-09-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
On 16 Sep 2000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > Yes. fs/read_write calls the NFS subsystem. The problem then is that > NFS uses the generic_file_{read,write,mmap}() interfaces. These are > what enforce use of the page cache. > > You could drop these functions, but that would mean designing an > ent

Re: bug in blkdev <-> VFS interaction. (oops) (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Alain Knaff
>On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alain Knaff wrote: > >> >Flush >> >> What is so shocking about flushing away the cache for a >> write-protected floppy? > >Erm... The fact that final close() will do it anyway? Well it shouldn't, that would be a useless performance hit. > Oh, and the fact >that we have a g

Re: test9-pre1 hang when loading scsi-ide cdrom

2000-09-16 Thread Kenneth Johansson
Frank van de Pol wrote: > Just experienced a (reproducable) hang of the system when loading the > drivers for my cdrom drives. (ide-cd and ide-scsi). System freezes > completely; interupts / alt-sysreq is still working. > ... > > It appears to me that something breaks during the init/registrati

Re: insmod failure in kernel-2.2.14

2000-09-16 Thread Christoph Hellwig
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > i am using kernel-2.2.14-5.0, > i wrote a simple module to just printk a a message and tried to insmod it, > but > it gave error message: resource/device busy (EBUSY) > but the message gets printed in /var/log/messages > the code is: > -

Re: RAID HW Questions...

2000-09-16 Thread Bryan Whitehead
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Ricky Beam wrote: > This is true of _any_ binary module. That's why I never use binary modules. That's why I don't want to use them either. > Have you bothered tell us what that error is? I've not seen anything on > dpt's mail-list. (Which is where this should be discusse

Re: insmod failure in kernel-2.2.14

2000-09-16 Thread Alan Cox
> i wrote a simple module to just printk a a message and tried to insmod it, > but > it gave error message: resource/device busy (EBUSY) > but the message gets printed in /var/log/messages Compile it with -Wall and you should see why - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lin

Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

2000-09-16 Thread Giuliano Pochini
> The current HUGE queue size is probably another reason for > the very bad latencies we sometimes see... Yes, but if the queue is short processes are likely to remain blocked in D state for more time and the chances to merge rq are smaller. IMHO we should add a way to give priority to rqs from

Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

2000-09-16 Thread Giuliano Pochini
> That's one approach; I prefer my "weighted scoring" approach. Supposing we > have three devices: a solid state disk (instant "seeks"), a hard drive and > a tape. The SSD will benefit from merges (fewer commands to process), but > not hugely - set both the metrics at 1, so a 64Kb request is ju

Re: folk: no more resource available

2000-09-16 Thread Alan Cox
> How can I run more that 500 process ? is there any > /proc to change or is the hard limitation of kernel > 2.2.x ? Edit include/linux/tasks.h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://w

Re: RAID HW Questions...

2000-09-16 Thread Alan Cox
> One of the primary reasons for use the DPT driver is to use the DPT RAID > mananger. The Linux I2O code doesn't (currently) have that support. It > could be added later, but someone's got to get the card to work with the DPT don't do standard I2O block management. Linux supports the standard

Re: RAID HW Questions...

2000-09-16 Thread Ricky Beam
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Bryan Whitehead wrote: >> Have you bothered tell us what that error is? I've not seen anything on >> dpt's mail-list. (Which is where this should be discussed.) > >I've emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] (that's what the linuxi2oreadme.txt says to >do for help) MANY times pleading for

Re: test9-pre1 hang when loading scsi-ide cdrom

2000-09-16 Thread Frank van de Pol
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 09:04:55PM +0200, Kenneth Johansson wrote: > > If it worked for you in test8 the only thing that changed is that in sr.c the > init_sr() function been maked with __init and the exit_sr() with __exit. You > could test removing them (__init and __exit that is not the functio

Re: Attempting to mount Zip causes floppy access (2.2.16)

2000-09-16 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 11:35:24AM +0100, Nick Holloway wrote: > I have a zip disk which I attempted to mount using the following fstab > entry: > > /dev/sda4 /zip vfat noauto,nodev,nosuid,user > > This caused a spew of "bread failed" errors, and the mount process ended > up blocked in "wai

Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2

2000-09-16 Thread James Sutherland
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Giuliano Pochini wrote: > I wrote, then got air-brushed out of the thread?! > > That's one approach; I prefer my "weighted scoring" approach. Supposing we > > have three devices: a solid state disk (instant "seeks"), a hard drive and > > a tape. The SSD will benefit from merg

Tailmerging for Ext2 - release 0.0

2000-09-16 Thread Daniel Phillips
Here we are, finally: code. I do not make any claim that this code is elegant, correct, complete, esthetically pleasing or that it will refrain from eating your hard disk. What this code will do is let you verify for yourself whether my proposed approach to tailmerging for Ext2 is worth the effo

  1   2   >