ED]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: weird PCI problems...
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Martin Mares wrote:
> Anyway, can you send me your /proc/ioports and /proc/iomem, please?
Yes, sure:
-0009fbff : System RAM
0009fc00-0009 : reserved
000a000
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Martin Mares wrote:
> Anyway, can you send me your /proc/ioports and /proc/iomem, please?
Yes, sure:
-0009fbff : System RAM
0009fc00-0009 : reserved
000a-000b : Video RAM area
000c-000c7fff : Video ROM
000d-000d0fff : Extension ROM
000d4000-000d47
Hi Tigran!
Sorry for the delay, I'm now finishing up for my final exams, so I get to
answering my mail once per day if I'm lucky.
> Yes, doing it like this works:
>
> --- linux/drivers/pci/pci.c Mon Sep 18 12:35:11 2000
> +++ work/drivers/pci/pci.cMon Sep 18 13:12:20 2000
> @@ -714,7 +714
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> But one needs to understand your fix first. Shouldn't that
> !is_cardbus be is_cardbus instead?
Yes, doing it like this works:
--- linux/drivers/pci/pci.c Mon Sep 18 12:35:11 2000
+++ work/drivers/pci/pci.c Mon Sep 18 13:12:20 2000
@@ -714,7
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Because Cardbus on this recent Dell laptop has
> suddenly stopped working:
yes, looks like we do have similar Dell laptops ;)
> I don't see where we _ever_ scan behind a Cardbus bridge???
>
> As a datapoint, this hack makes Cardbus work ag
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> I just found out that my earlier statement "2.2.x is okay" should be
> changed to "win98 is okay" so there are definitely problems with sharing
> PCI irqs between eepro100/3c59x/(rtl)8139(too) in both 2.2.x and 2.4.x. I
> utterly don't care about 2.2.x b
Hi Martin,
I just found out that my earlier statement "2.2.x is okay" should be
changed to "win98 is okay" so there are definitely problems with sharing
PCI irqs between eepro100/3c59x/(rtl)8139(too) in both 2.2.x and 2.4.x. I
utterly don't care about 2.2.x but I am in the mood to find out what's
7 matches
Mail list logo
