On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> But one needs to understand your fix first. Shouldn't that
> !is_cardbus be is_cardbus instead?
Yes, doing it like this works:
--- linux/drivers/pci/pci.c Mon Sep 18 12:35:11 2000
+++ work/drivers/pci/pci.c Mon Sep 18 13:12:20 2000
@@ -714,7 +714,7 @@
* We need to blast all three values with a single write.
*/
pci_write_config_dword(dev, PCI_PRIMARY_BUS, buses);
- if (!is_cardbus) {
+ if (is_cardbus) {
/* Now we can scan all subordinate buses... */
max = pci_do_scan_bus(child);
} else {
Martin, is this totally wrong? I.e. will it break the case of multiple
peer PCI buses? Note that with the above I see absolutely all my devices,
like this:
# lspci -tv
-+-[03]---00.0 3Com Corporation: Unknown device 5257
\-[00]-+-00.0 Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX Host bridge
+-01.0-[01]----00.0 ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage P/M Mobility AGP
2x
+-03.0 Texas Instruments PCI1225
+-03.1 Texas Instruments PCI1225
+-07.0 Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 ISA
+-07.1 Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 IDE
+-07.2 Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 USB
+-07.3 Intel Corporation 82371AB PIIX4 ACPI
+-08.0 ESS Technology ES1978 Maestro 2E
\-11.0-[02]--+-01.0 Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139
+-02.0 Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100]
+-05.0 CMD Technology Inc PCI0646
+-07.0 Adaptec AIC-7880U
\-08.0 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX [Fast Etherlink]
Regards,
Tigran
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
