On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 01:11:39PM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> Kingsley Cheung writes:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:29:12AM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > >
> > > > Now I understand that this is not the latest release of relayfs (there
> > > > are the red
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Hm? Relayfs does not support a `cat /dev/relay/AChannelName` anymore?
This was a requirement for it to be included.
Karim
--
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>BTW, I just want to point out that there aren't any problems with
>read() in the version of relayfs included in the -mm tree (i.e. the
>'redux' version), since of course it doesn't support read().
Hm? Relayfs does not support a `cat /dev/relay/AChannelName` anymore?
>I'll continue maintaining th
Kingsley Cheung writes:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:29:12AM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >
> > > Now I understand that this is not the latest release of relayfs (there
> > > are the redux patches, which I have yet to try). Nonetheless I'd like
[...]
>
1>http://www.opersys.com/ftp/pub/relayfs/patch-relayfs-2.6.10-050113
2>ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pagg/download/linux-2.6.10-pagg.patch-4
I guess (2) is already in 2.6.11, because I do not get any compile and load
errors (good so!), is it?
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: se
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:29:12AM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > Now I understand that this is not the latest release of relayfs (there
> > are the redux patches, which I have yet to try). Nonetheless I'd like
> > to know whether this behaviour is deliberate.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Now I understand that this is not the latest release of relayfs (there
> are the redux patches, which I have yet to try). Nonetheless I'd like
> to know whether this behaviour is deliberate. Is it?
Nope, looks like you've found a bug - thanks for the patch. A
Hi
I'm using relayfs to relay data from a kernel module to user space on
a SuSE 2.6.5 kernel. I'm not absolutely sure what version of relayfs
has been back ported to it.
While reading data from the channel I've been seeing read() return 0
prematurely. However, the 0 does not signify that the f
8 matches
Mail list logo