Hi 

I'm using relayfs to relay data from a kernel module to user space on
a SuSE 2.6.5 kernel.  I'm not absolutely sure what version of relayfs
has been back ported to it.

While reading data from the channel I've been seeing read() return 0
prematurely.  However, the 0 does not signify that the file is being
closed for there is still data available afterwards.  

I've noticed that zeros occur when roughly one page of data has been
read.  I suspect that they occur whenever there is a read across the
relayfs sub-buffers.

Now I understand that this is not the latest release of relayfs (there
are the redux patches, which I have yet to try).  Nonetheless I'd like
to know whether this behaviour is deliberate.  Is it? 

Thanks,
-- 
                Kingsley

P.S. I've been able to get around this by deliberately modifying
do_read() with the attached patch.  I'm not absolutely sure its
correct but it seems to work.
Index: fs/relayfs/relay.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /export/cvsroot/SuSE-Kernel-2.4.21/fs/relayfs/Attic/relay.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.2.1
diff -u -r1.1.2.1 relay.c
--- fs/relayfs/relay.c  18 Feb 2005 00:00:51 -0000      1.1.2.1
+++ fs/relayfs/relay.c  23 Mar 2005 09:00:42 -0000
@@ -1445,26 +1445,22 @@
 
        avail_offset = cur_idx = relay_get_offset(rchan, &max_offset);
 
+       last_buf_byte_offset = (read_bufno + 1) * buf_size - 1;
        if (cur_idx == read_offset) {
                if (atomic_read(&rchan->suspended) == 1) {
-                       read_offset += 1;
+                       read_offset = last_buf_byte_offset + 1;
                        if (read_offset >= max_offset)
                                read_offset = 0;
                        *actual_read_offset = read_offset;
                } else {
-                       *new_offset = read_offset;
+                       *new_offset = read_offset; 
                        return 0;
                }
-       } else {
-               last_buf_byte_offset = (read_bufno + 1) * buf_size - 1;
-               if (read_offset == last_buf_byte_offset) {
-                       if (unused_bytes != 1) {
-                               read_offset += 1;
-                               if (read_offset >= max_offset)
-                                       read_offset = 0;
-                               *actual_read_offset = read_offset;
-                       }
-               }
+       } else if ((read_offset + unused_bytes) > last_buf_byte_offset) {
+               read_offset = last_buf_byte_offset + 1;
+               if (read_offset >= max_offset)
+                       read_offset = 0;
+               *actual_read_offset = read_offset;
        }
 
        read_bufno = read_offset / buf_size;

Reply via email to