Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2019-08-23 Thread John Hubbard
On 8/23/19 2:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190822: > > The thermal tree gained a conflict against the jc_docs tree. > > The rdma tree gained a conflict against the rdma-fixes tree. > > The net-next tree gained conflicts against the pci tree. > > The crypto tree g

linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2019-08-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190822: The thermal tree gained a conflict against the jc_docs tree. The rdma tree gained a conflict against the rdma-fixes tree. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the pci tree. The crypto tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The drm tree gained a confl

linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2018-08-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.20 material to your linux-next included branches until after v4.19-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20180822: New tree: at91-fixes The kbuild tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20180822. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree):

linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2017-08-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170822: The net-next tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. It also gained a conflict against the net tree. The slave-dma tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 8264 8196 files changed, 453593 insertions(+), 1

linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2016-08-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160822: The drm-intel tree gained a build failure so I used the veriosn from next-20160822. The kbuild tree still had its build warnings for PowerPC, for which I reverted a commit. The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20160822. Non-

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2014-09-02 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:21:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 12:04:45PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > I provided qemu images and instructions as follows. > > http://server.roeck-us.net/qemu/mipsel/ MIPS 32 bit, little > > endian > > http://server.r

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2014-09-02 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 12:04:45PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > I provided qemu images and instructions as follows. > http://server.roeck-us.net/qemu/mipsel/ MIPS 32 bit, little > endian > http://server.roeck-us.net/qemu/mips64el/ MIPS 64 bit, little > endian > > Let

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2014-09-02 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:55:53AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:04:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:46:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > Yes, the problem is stil

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2014-09-02 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:04:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:46:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Yes, the problem is still seen in next-140829. See qemu test results at > > > http://server.roec

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2014-09-02 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:04:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:46:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Yes, the problem is still seen in next-140829. See qemu test results at > > > http://server.roec

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2014-09-02 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:04:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:46:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Yes, the problem is still seen in next-140829. See qemu test results at > > http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. > > > > I provided sparc64 images at http://ser

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2014-09-01 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:46:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Yes, the problem is still seen in next-140829. See qemu test results at > http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. > > I provided sparc64 images at http://server.roeck-us.net/qemu/sparc64/. > The README file includes instructions on

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2014-09-01 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 09/01/2014 08:58 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 09:57:41PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 08:04:22AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20140822: The mfd tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20140822. The usb

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2014-09-01 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 09:57:41PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 08:04:22AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20140822: > > > > The mfd tree gained a build failure so I used the version from > > next-20140822. > > > > The usb-gadget tree gai

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2014-08-24 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 08:04:22AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20140822: > > The mfd tree gained a build failure so I used the version from > next-20140822. > > The usb-gadget tree gained a conflict against the usb-gadget-fixes tree. > > The pwm tree gained a buil

linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2014-08-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20140822: The mfd tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20140822. The usb-gadget tree gained a conflict against the usb-gadget-fixes tree. The pwm tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a couple of commits. The staging tree still had its bu

Re: [alsa-devel] linux-next: Tree for Aug 23 (sound/isa/cmi)

2012-08-23 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:56:34 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 08/22/2012 10:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20120822: > > > > > > on i386: > > CC sound/isa/cmi8328.o > sound/isa/cmi8328.c: In function 'snd_cmi8328_remove': > sound/isa/cmi8328.c:416

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23 (sound/isa/cmi)

2012-08-23 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 08/22/2012 10:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20120822: > on i386: CC sound/isa/cmi8328.o sound/isa/cmi8328.c: In function 'snd_cmi8328_remove': sound/isa/cmi8328.c:416:24: error: 'cmi' undeclared (first use in this function) sound/isa/cmi8328.c:416:24: n

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23 (staging/iio/gyro)

2012-08-23 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 08/22/2012 10:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20120822: > on i386: CC drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16260_core.o drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16260_core.c: In function 'adis16260_probe': drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16260_core.c:655:7: warning: passing argu

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 23 (drivers/bus/omap-ocp2scp.c)

2012-08-23 Thread ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 08/22/2012 10:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20120822: >> > > > on i386: > > CC [M] drivers/bus/omap-ocp2scp.o > drivers/bus/omap-ocp2scp.c:70:1: error: '__mod_of_device_table' aliased to > undefined sy

linux-next: Tree for Aug 23

2012-08-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20120822: New tree: pstore The tip tree gained a conflict against the rr tree. The rcu tree gained a conflict against the tip tree. The kvm tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20120822. The drivers-x86 tree still has its build failure so I used th