On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 10/24/2007 05:26 PM, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I fill something wrong here.
> >>> Is it possible to reduce the amount of timer interrupts?
> >>> Is it possible to force enable C1,C2 and C3 states when c1e disabled?
> >>>
> >> How are you d
2007/10/25, Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/24/2007 05:26 PM, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I fill something wrong here.
> >>> Is it possible to reduce the amount of timer interrupts?
> >>> Is it possible to force enable C1,C2 and C3 states when c1e disabled?
> >>>
> >> How are y
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 10/24/2007 05:26 PM, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I fill something wrong here.
> >>> Is it possible to reduce the amount of timer interrupts?
> >>> Is it possible to force enable C1,C2 and C3 states when c1e disabled?
> >>>
> >> How are you di
On 10/24/2007 05:26 PM, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
>>>
>>> I fill something wrong here.
>>> Is it possible to reduce the amount of timer interrupts?
>>> Is it possible to force enable C1,C2 and C3 states when c1e disabled?
>>>
>> How are you disabling C1E?
>>
>>
> dirty hack, i just follow the Free
2007/10/19, Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/01/2007 02:15 AM, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have ASUS F3T notebook with dualcore AMD processor. It has c1e feature
> > enabled. I test linux-2.6.23-rc8-hrt1 kernel. Everything is work (thanks
> > to lapic disable patch), bu
On 10/01/2007 02:15 AM, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have ASUS F3T notebook with dualcore AMD processor. It has c1e feature
> enabled. I test linux-2.6.23-rc8-hrt1 kernel. Everything is work (thanks
> to lapic disable patch), but i have to many processor interrupts per
> seconds (abo
2007/10/1, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > No, it boot and work normally. The only thing i bother, is the additional
>
> Ok you want an additional feature; not a bug fixed.
>
> Please make that always clear.
>
> > 260 timer interrupts per seconds.
> > Here is short result:
> >
> > c1e enabled:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:09:53 +0200
> There is normally a threshold above which you don't save significantly
> more power by doing less timer interrupts. You can test this
> by doing the CONFIG_HZ=100 above.
however the point you're describing tends to more be around 25ms to
50ms HZ=100 is onl
> No, it boot and work normally. The only thing i bother, is the additional
Ok you want an additional feature; not a bug fixed.
Please make that always clear.
> 260 timer interrupts per seconds.
> Here is short result:
>
> c1e enabled:
> -- power consumption about 23 watts
> -- there is onl
Mikhail Kshevetskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The same situation can be observed for linux-2.6.22.
You're saying 2.6.22/x86-64 without any patches doesn't boot out of the box
with C1E enabled? If yes what are the exact symptoms?
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
10 matches
Mail list logo