Re: test13-pre4-ac2/test13-pre7 ax25 undefined reference

2000-12-31 Thread Sid Boyce
Thanks for the prompt response. Regards Sid. Alan Cox wrote: > > > The problem showed up on the stroke of test13-pre4-ac2 and stuff from > > Alan has been merged in. I went from pre4-ac2 to pre5 (AOK) and now > > attempting pre7... > > Its definitely coming from the AX.25 rela

Re: test13-pre4-ac2/test13-pre7 ax25 undefined reference

2000-12-30 Thread Alan Cox
> The problem showed up on the stroke of test13-pre4-ac2 and stuff from > Alan has been merged in. I went from pre4-ac2 to pre5 (AOK) and now > attempting pre7... Its definitely coming from the AX.25 related changes. Please send me your .config and I'll go squash this one > drivers/net

Re: test13-pre4-ac2 -- The cardbus/pcmcia sockets no longer work with two devices present at boot time.

2000-12-27 Thread Jens Taprogge
This seems to be a problem that was introduced with the big ACPI update as pointed out earlier by Andrew Morton. Try disabling ACPI (since your BIOS does not seem to have ACPI support anyway it should not be a disadvantage) and see if PCMCIA support works again on bootup. Jens On Wed, Dec 27, 2

Re: test13-pre4... udf problem with dvd access vs test12

2000-12-25 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Dec 25 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > Fix confirmed. Am i supposed to get some DriveSense errors? I probably > am just don't recall. Good. The whole idea of cdrom_log_sense is to be able to cleanly limit the (often) sense-less (yes, haha :) ide-cd verbosity. Some of the css stuff are ob

Re: test13-pre4... udf problem with dvd access vs test12

2000-12-25 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Sorry, I meant DriveReady SeekComplete Error "Mohammad A. Haque" wrote: > Fix confirmed. Am i supposed to get some DriveSense errors? I probably > am just don't recall. -- = Mohammad A. Haque http:

Re: test13-pre4... udf problem with dvd access vs test12

2000-12-25 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Fix confirmed. Am i supposed to get some DriveSense errors? I probably am just don't recall. Jens Axboe wrote: > Yes I know about this one, I've attached the patch here again. Linus, > could you apply? > > --- drivers/ide/ide-cd.c~ Sat Dec 23 23:59:52 2000 > +++ drivers/ide/ide-cd.c

Re: test13-pre4... udf problem with dvd access vs test12

2000-12-25 Thread Jens Axboe
On Mon, Dec 25 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > Jens, I made sure to reverse the udf patch I mentioned in another thread > (all it really is merging changes from linux-udf cvs into the current > kernel). So this is from a clean test13-pre4 w/ some netfilter fixes. Ok, looks unrelated however. >

Re: test13-pre4... udf problem with dvd access vs test12

2000-12-25 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
Jens, I made sure to reverse the udf patch I mentioned in another thread (all it really is merging changes from linux-udf cvs into the current kernel). So this is from a clean test13-pre4 w/ some netfilter fixes. ksymoops 0.7c on i686 2.4.0-test13-pre4. Options used -V (default) -K (sp

Re: test13-pre4... udf problem with dvd access vs test12

2000-12-25 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
I just captured the oops. It happens when you try to mount (mount -t udf /dev/foo /mnt/bar) an encrypted dvd. At least it does on my end. Unencrypted dvds mount fine. ksymoops coming soon. Frank Jacobberger wrote: > > Odd happening here. Been running good as gold through test12 with > accessin

Re: test13-pre4 ip defrag oops

2000-12-24 Thread kuznet
Hello! > eax: 20202037 ebx: d3a406c0 ecx: cf683024 edx: c734a2a0 Ough... found eventually. skb->dev turns out to be not initialized. 8)8) This patchlet surely fixes the bug. (plus writes are ordered) Alexey --- ../vger3-001222/linux/net/core/skbuff.c Fri Dec 22 19:37:54 2000 +++ l

Re: test13-pre4 fails to compile

2000-12-23 Thread Kai Germaschewski
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, ebi4 wrote: > ld: cannot open drivers/ieee1394/ieee1394.a: No such file or directory > make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 I sent the following patch to Linus already. It should fix the problem. --Kai diff -ur linux-2.4.0-test13-pre3/drivers/ieee1394/Makefile linux-2.4.0-test13

Re: test13-pre4-ac2 - part of diff fails

2000-12-23 Thread Steven Cole
Daniel Stone wrote: >linux-2.4.0-test12 + reiserfs + test13-pre4 + reiserfs makefile fix (only >changes fs/reiserfs/Makefile) + netfilter patch-o-matic stuff (only touches >net/ipv4/netfilter) + test13-pre4-ac2. I was able to patch and build 2.4.0test13pre4-ac2. I did not see the problem with sm

Re: test13-pre4-ac2 - part of diff fails

2000-12-23 Thread Daniel Stone
succeeded at 511 (offset 9 lines). > >> > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > >> > arch/i386/kernel/smp.c.rej > >> > > >> > Works fine if I reverse it and then put it back in. ? > >> > >> Its a bug in my patch - get 1

Re: test13-pre4-ac2 - part of diff fails

2000-12-23 Thread Mark Orr
gt;> > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file >> > arch/i386/kernel/smp.c.rej >> > >> > Works fine if I reverse it and then put it back in. ? >> >> Its a bug in my patch - get 13pre4ac2 .. > > Um. > Subject: Re: test13-pre4-ac2 - pa

Re: test13-pre4-ac2 - part of diff fails

2000-12-23 Thread Daniel Stone
s to file arch/i386/kernel/smp.c.rej > > > > Works fine if I reverse it and then put it back in. ? > > Its a bug in my patch - get 13pre4ac2 .. Um. Subject: Re: test13-pre4-ac2 - part of diff fails It's _IN_ 13-4ac2. d - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs

Re: test13-pre4-ac2 - part of diff fails

2000-12-23 Thread Alan Cox
> patching file arch/i386/kernel/smp.c > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > Apply anyway? [n] y > Hunk #1 FAILED at 278. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 511 (offset 9 lines). > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/i386/kernel/smp.c.rej > > Works fine if I

Re: test13-pre4

2000-12-22 Thread Eyal Lebedinsky
Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Ok, found it, you can workaround it with: > > CONFIG_LVM_PROC_FS=y Yes, this fixed it. I do build with proc, and have no idea why this was off in my config. Anyway, why is there this private proc option in .config at all? most modules use the global setting for proc (CO

Re: test13-pre4

2000-12-22 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 05:07:27PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> - pre4: > >>- Andrea Arkangeli: update to LVM-0.9 > > > lvm.c: In function `lvm_do_create_proc_entry_of_lv': > > [snip] > > Hi, > > The patch below

Re: test13-pre4

2000-12-22 Thread Arjan van de Ven
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: >> - pre4: >>- Andrea Arkangeli: update to LVM-0.9 > lvm.c: In function `lvm_do_create_proc_entry_of_lv': [snip] Hi, The patch below fixes this. Greetings, Arjan van de Ven diff -ur linux/drivers/md/lvm.c /mnt/raid/0/

Re: test13-pre4

2000-12-22 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 04:01:50PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 03:31:45PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 12:00:27AM +1100, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > > > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > - pre4: > > > >- Andrea Arkangeli: update to LVM-0.9 >

Re: test13-pre4

2000-12-22 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 03:31:45PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 12:00:27AM +1100, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > - pre4: > > >- Andrea Arkangeli: update to LVM-0.9 > > > > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/local/src/linux/include -Wall > > -Wstrict-p

Re: test13-pre4

2000-12-22 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 12:00:27AM +1100, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > - pre4: > >- Andrea Arkangeli: update to LVM-0.9 > > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/local/src/linux/include -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > -mpreferred-stac

Re: test13-pre4

2000-12-22 Thread Eyal Lebedinsky
Linus Torvalds wrote: > - pre4: >- Andrea Arkangeli: update to LVM-0.9 gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/local/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -malign-functions=4 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include /