On 23-Dec-2000 Daniel Stone wrote:
>> > patching file arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
>> > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
>> > Apply anyway? [n] y
>> > Hunk #1 FAILED at 278.
>> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 511 (offset 9 lines).
>> > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>> > arch/i386/kernel/smp.c.rej
>> >
>> > Works fine if I reverse it and then put it back in. ?
>>
>> Its a bug in my patch - get 13pre4ac2 ..
>
> Um.
> Subject: Re: test13-pre4-ac2 - part of diff fails
> It's _IN_ 13-4ac2.
I applied test13-pre4-ac2 here, and it applied cleanly.
Are you applying it to a clean tree? Are your using
patch v2.5.4 ? (that's the version I have)
FWIW, I was getting smp.c patch failures (well, it said the
patch was previously applied) along with a bunch of
IPTables stuff -- that was a couple of -ac's ago.
AC1 and AC2 applied cleanly, tho AC1 wouldnt compile
uniprocessor/no-quotas unless you added a
#include <linux/smp_lock.h> to fs/ext2/balloc.c
(i.e. it left some hanging refs to lock_kernel and
unlock_kernel in fs.o, and I think there was also
one in the UDF module. It's fixed in -ac2.
--
Mark Orr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
