Re: scsi bus numbering

2001-04-02 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
>"Justin T. Gibbs" wrote: >> It is bogus that this stuff depends on link order to function >> correctly. > >No, it is simply one more rule, and one that is not immediately >obvious. Take heart though. Like Rolaids, 2.5's updated makefile >system will bring relief... Its not something the build

Re: scsi bus numbering

2001-04-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
"Justin T. Gibbs" wrote: > It is bogus that this stuff depends on link order to function > correctly. No, it is simply one more rule, and one that is not immediately obvious. Take heart though. Like Rolaids, 2.5's updated makefile system will bring relief... Make sure to add a comment, when yo

Re: scsi bus numbering

2001-04-02 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
>The intent is that all built in HBA drivers are >initialized _before_ the built in upper level >drivers (e.g. sd). To get the effect you describe >the driver init order seems to have been: > register ncr53c8xxx > register sd > register aic7xxx # too late ... It is bogus that this stuff

Re: scsi bus numbering

2001-04-01 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
>On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > >[...] > >> > scsihosts < >> >> As a boot time option try: >> scsihosts=aic7xxx:ncr53c8xxx >> or if you are using lilo, in /etc/lilo.conf add: >> append="scsihosts=aic7xxx:ncr53c8xxx" > >that does indeed change the bus numberi

Re: scsi bus numbering

2001-04-01 Thread Douglas Gilbert
Peter Daum wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > > [...] > > > > scsihosts < > > > > As a boot time option try: > > scsihosts=aic7xxx:ncr53c8xxx > > or if you are using lilo, in /etc/lilo.conf add: > > append="scsihosts=aic7xxx:ncr53c8xxx" > > that d

Re: scsi bus numbering

2001-04-01 Thread Peter Daum
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Douglas Gilbert wrote: [...] > > scsihosts < > > As a boot time option try: > scsihosts=aic7xxx:ncr53c8xxx > or if you are using lilo, in /etc/lilo.conf add: > append="scsihosts=aic7xxx:ncr53c8xxx" that does indeed change the bus numbering. Unfortun

Re: scsi bus numbering

2001-04-01 Thread Douglas Gilbert
Peter Daum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For some reason, the order of initializing the scsi drivers > changed between 2.4.2 and 2.4.3: If both, ncr53c8xx and aic7xxx > drivers are included in the kernel, up to version 2.4.2, the > adaptec driver always came first (so the first disk on an adaptec >