On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Ug. Have you seen the ISO version of "field: value" struct initializers?
Yes. Almost trivial search-and-replace job. Why are you asking?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> [...]
>
> > Patches are welcome. But keep in mind that we _are_ dependent on a
> > particular compiler. gcc, that is. I would be glad to get rid of it - the
> > codebase is extremely messy. However, rem
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> Where does the idea that the kernel 'needs' a special compiler
> come from ? I have been under the impression that that is just
Mostly from the sad fact that it does.
> what we were trying to get away from . I am remin
Hello Alexander ,
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > I personally dislike the 'autmatically detect kgcc and gcc272' patches a lot,
> > and I think we should put a sentence like
> > If you are using a distribution that ships with
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I personally dislike the 'autmatically detect kgcc and gcc272' patches a lot,
> and I think we should put a sentence like
>
> If you are using a distribution that ships with a default C compiler that is
> not able to compile linux kernel, use make
5 matches
Mail list logo
