On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: > Where does the idea that the kernel 'needs' a special compiler > come from ? I have been under the impression that that is just Mostly from the sad fact that it does. > what we were trying to get away from . I am reminded of other > os's that required their propritary compiler in order to create > a os image . Please let us not travel that road . Tia , JimL Patches are welcome. But keep in mind that we _are_ dependent on a particular compiler. gcc, that is. I would be glad to get rid of it - the codebase is extremely messy. However, removing gcc-isms is a huge work. You are welcome to do it, indeed, but so far nobody had done that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- We interrupt you regularly scheduled catfight for.... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled catf... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled ... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled ... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regularly schedu... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly schedu... Mr. James W. Laferriere
- Re: We interrupt you regularly sc... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regularly sc... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regular... Horst von Brand
- Re: We interrupt you reg... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regular... Jeff Garzik
- Re: We interrupt you reg... Alexander Viro
- Re: We interrupt you regular... Pavel Machek
- Re: We interrupt you reg... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly scheduled ... Ben Collins
- Re: We interrupt you regularly schedu... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: We interrupt you regularly sc... Alan Cox
- Re: We interrupt you regular... Petri Kaukasoina