> is change to field name temporary, and name will be reverted back
> to flags, even although contents may differ between 2.2.x and 2.4.x,
> or is there features to stay? Currently VMware does
>
> "^\(features\|flags\).* tsc"
>
> but question is - should we leave it here, or revert it back?
I
On 23 Nov 00 at 20:22, Alan Cox wrote:
> > vmware-2.0.3-786 refused to run. Running vmware-config.pl resulted in a
> > the following message:
>
> Run 2.4.0-test11-ac3
Hi Alan,
is change to field name temporary, and name will be reverted back
to flags, even although contents may differ between
> vmware-2.0.3-786 refused to run. Running vmware-config.pl resulted in a
> the following message:
Run 2.4.0-test11-ac3
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:07:01PM -0800, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> I just compiled and installed kernel 2.4.0-test11. Upon rebooting,
> vmware-2.0.3-786 refused to run. Running vmware-config.pl resulted in a
> the following message:
>
> "Your processor does not have a Time Stamp Counter.
Tiny patch for vmware-config.pl
Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
> I just compiled and installed kernel 2.4.0-test11. Upon rebooting,
> vmware-2.0.3-786 refused to run. Running vmware-config.pl resulted in a
> the following message:
>
> "Your processor does not have a Time Stamp Counter. VMwa
5 matches
Mail list logo
