Re: SVr4/SVID/SUS IPC conformance

2007-08-17 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 17/08/07, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 19:18 +0200, Anton Arapov wrote: > > > > IPC code is good, EIDRM is justification of EINVAL. But neither SVr4 nor > > SVID \ > > documents EIDRM. Single Unix Specification mentions EINVAL but not EIDRM > > as a

Re: SVr4/SVID/SUS IPC conformance

2007-08-17 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 19:18 +0200, Anton Arapov wrote: > > IPC code is good, EIDRM is justification of EINVAL. But neither SVr4 nor > SVID \ > documents EIDRM. Single Unix Specification mentions EINVAL but not EIDRM as > a \ > possible failure for shmctl(), so the current kernel behavior is