On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 19:18 +0200, Anton Arapov wrote: > > IPC code is good, EIDRM is justification of EINVAL. But neither SVr4 nor > SVID \ > documents EIDRM. Single Unix Specification mentions EINVAL but not EIDRM as > a \ > possible failure for shmctl(), so the current kernel behavior is not merely \ > self-inconsistent but a flat violation of the spec.
these specs tend to always allow additional error codes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
